New FBI Strzok Texts Reveal Massive Top Level Conspiracy To Evade Security & Monitering

In a smoking gun text message exchange released by the Senate Homeland Security
committee today, FBI officials Lisa Page and Peter Strzok are found discussing
methods to evade federal security monitoring and preservation laws.

Page: Have a meeting with turgal about getting iphone in a day or so

Strzok: Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?

Page: No, he’s proposing that we just stop following them. Apparently the requirement to capture texts came from [Office of Management and Budget], but we’re the only org (I’m told) who is following that rule.

His point is, if no one else is doing it why should we. . .

I’m told – thought I have seen – that there is an IG report that says everyone is failing. But one has changed anything, so why not just join in the failure.

thehill.com...

So, here we have Page who says she has been informed by upper management
that she should just ignore following the rules because everyone else is breaking
the security regulations! And Strzok..."Hot Damn!" lets break the laws!

"Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?"

What in the world is going on here? The entire agency is just flaunting
the record keeping security protocols?

In light of this, Senator Ron Johnson has now expanded the investigation
and sent a demand to the DOJ for the records of 16 other FBI employees,
including James Comey and Andrew McCabe.

"According to text messages produced to the Committee, Ms. Page and Mr. Strzok make references to communicating with other FBI employees via text message, phone call, email, and voice mail. Additional text messages suggest that FBI officials used non-official email accounts and messaging programs to communicate about official business," the letter says.

The letter goes on to request the communications of 16 additional current and former FBI officials, including former FBI Director James Comey; ex-Comey chief of staff James Rybicki; outgoing deputy director Andrew McCabe; former FBI general counsel James Baker and many other top officials.

www.foxnews.com...

This leads to the question that Rand Paul is asking.
Do these two still have security clearances?

Obviously, this goes to the very top levels of the agency. How can they be allowed
to investigate themselves? Where would we be without congressional oversight
such as The House Intel Committee, who is earnestly seeking to follow the
constitution with oversight responsibilities?

We would still be in the dark, with only the
rabid voices of the talking heads of msm.

Again, who will be held accountable?

This goes all the way to the top, they obviously can not be trusted
to investigate themselves! Its time to call for a Special Prosecutor
to look into this egregious abuse of the law!

Release The Memo!

Like I saw on one blog ... You can try to excuse this by saying they just wanted the freedom to discuss their extramarital affair without anyone ever exposing, but since nothing we've seen sounds the least bit lover-like to date, that's a bit of a hard sell, particularly given some of the other things their released texts have said.

a reply to: burntheships

Hmmm.

If the fbi agents themselves were interested in finding ways around the public being able to view their records,

It may explain why they didn't think Hillary doing the same thing was a big deal.

a reply to: burntheships

They did "join in failure"

These people, our government, our institutions, those charged with sacred duties, those asked to be noble custodians of something bigger than themselves, have failed us all.

Please do something about it if can.

All those texts reveal is how two people act when they just start dating.

Embarrassing? Yes. But only in a human (we've all done it) way.

Politically significant? Nah.

a reply to: Moresby

Your kidding, right?

Or, your saying Page is dating her OIG?

Or is she dating the Office of Management?

Obviously, she could be doing them all, right?

Please do enlighten me, because what I am reading is these
two plan to break the law because everyone else is doing it
and the IG knows about it and no one cares.

Every communication made in order to make a government decision is supposed to end up in the National Archive for the national record. But any communication made for political party business like fundraising must not use taxpayers resources or government systems. So when Clinton was in power, they had to create two separate networks; one for party business, the other for government use. That was too much temptation for general use, and that split seems to have percolated all the way into government.

It's illegal.

Our Founders would of already hanged them.

It's not cute it's treason.

originally posted by: whyamIhere
It's illegal.

Our Founders would of already hanged them.

It's not cute it's treason.

It's disgusting.

And if it's true that most/all federal government agencies are not enforcing record retention policies, then they need their paychecks and operating budgets withheld until they do.

Those records are evidence of the agencies' operations for oversight purposes. If they think they are all going to evade oversight and operate in secrecy...they need to be shut down.

a reply to: burntheships

Has anyone seen a date associated with these texts?

a reply to: burntheships

"Oh hot damn. . . We get around our security/monitoring issues?"

The most damning part is not the discussion in itself, but the straight up admission, that the monitoring is an issue.

There it is, clear as day; they want to keep conducting themselves in a manner that cannot stand the light of the day. The monitoring is already an issue.

Wow.

Ladies and Gentlemen....meet the first 2 scapegoats that are about to be thrown under the bus by the Democrats.

a reply to: ketsuko

I agree, so far we have not seen much to indicate they are in
a romantic affair. I suppose the romance could have died out
a long time ago, and they were just complacent.

But just peachy keen if folks can now get away with breaking
the laws if they are having an affair, its a great cover if not real.

a reply to: DupontDeux

Not only that but if other communications are recovered via other means (NSA) it shows clear intent that they knew they were breaking the law...

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: burntheships

Has anyone seen a date associated with these texts?

Relevant question.

Another hypothetical, how lax were they with chain of evidence, with witness statements, with procedure?

How many cases does this pertain to, all of them?

How big is the can of worms and can the US even confront such a possibility as this?

originally posted by: ketsuko
...nothing we've seen sounds the least bit lover-like to date, that's a bit of a hard sell, particularly given some of the other things their released texts have said.

I could not agree more with this and have said it myself. They don't talk like they are carrying on an affair.

(And, not to be superficial, but they don't look like they go together.)

I am so suspicious of the claim they are/were having an affair.

a reply to: Grambler

Indeed.

Even when it involves a multi time offender like Weiner who is texting
a 15 year old girl pics of you know what. The word that comes to mind
is reprehensible.

And these are the people enforcing federal laws in The FBI and The DOJ?

Appalling.......

a reply to: burntheships


I don't even know who one should trust in government anymore. If they do another Special Prosecutor then who appoints them? Do you really want the guilty appointing their own? Its a stacked deck and the only to play a straight game is get a new deck. How is that going to come about?

originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: burntheships

Has anyone seen a date associated with these texts?

Not that I was able to find, so do not know if these are older
texts they just now released.

I'll look by image though, maybe that will turn up something.

a reply to: Moresby

They need to get their own phones for their affairs.

I work in IT and have handed over alot of instances of people misusing company devices for personal use, some minor like accessing youtube on cell data, all the way to emailing server IPs by accident to home email.

Everyone of them were fired.