It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: xuenchen
Fine by me.
Just charge the entire bureau with treason and hand down the sentences en masse.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
I'm trying to imagine in what world the accused can walk up to the prosecutor, look at the evidence against them and request that certain evidence be excluded from the prosecution.
It's probably not a perfect analogy, but it seems like that is what is happening here.
Curious thing politics.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
I'm trying to imagine in what world the accused can walk up to the prosecutor, look at the evidence against them and request that certain evidence be excluded from the prosecution.
It's probably not a perfect analogy, but it seems like that is what is happening here.
Curious thing politics.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: Jonjonj
I'm trying to imagine in what world the accused can walk up to the prosecutor, look at the evidence against them and request that certain evidence be excluded from the prosecution.
It's probably not a perfect analogy, but it seems like that is what is happening here.
Curious thing politics.
It's the same world where a person can hold a public trial in the media with no evidence but a note.
The manafort civil case has not gone to court yet. As soon as it does it will be thrown out. A motion for dismissal has been put forth and the hearing is this month. Your reference is the criminal case where the trial was set for sept.
And the fbi director never threatened to quit.
Top White House aides are worried FBI Director Christopher Wray could quit if the highly controversial Republican memo alleging the FBI abused its surveillance tools is released, multiple sources with knowledge of the situation tell CNN.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Annee
Hey A
I'm hearing fear is raising in WH that the memo will be a dud.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: YouSir
You do realize Wray never worked at the FBI until last year when he was appointed as its head by Trump, right?
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Jonjonj
I'm trying to imagine in what world the accused can walk up to the prosecutor, look at the evidence against them and request that certain evidence be excluded from the prosecution.
It's probably not a perfect analogy, but it seems like that is what is happening here.
Curious thing politics.
All these different agencies are presented to us as as watchdog or investigative bodies, with power of this and that. But really they are all just different heads of the same Hydra.
originally posted by: six67seven
It's no threat to national security to release names.
It might be a threat to the individual's security...
But they have no one to blame but themselves.
National security my ass!!!
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: shooterbrody
Lol CNN is a source?
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Urantia1111
a reply to: xuenchen
Fine by me.
Just charge the entire bureau with treason and hand down the sentences en masse.
Yah, the gubment should turn itself in straightaway.
When was the last agencies arrested one another?