It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI Issues Rare Official Statement on the Memo

page: 8
24
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 02:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Here is the supposed statement.

twitter.com...



😀 😲

Absolutely FNN material.

What a way to deflect.

🙊

Insider "Statement" !! 🚑

no signature


edit on Jan-31-2018 by xuenchen because: 🚑




posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 02:57 PM
link   
Nunez and House intelligence issues a rebuttal to the FBI statement.

intelligence.house.gov...



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 02:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Perfectenemy

Thank you for sharing that Nunez statement in its entirety. The liberal media is speaking about parts of it and using it to claim that President Trump is going against his own FBI and doj, but not in proper context. No surprise there.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 02:59 PM
link   
Oh that sucks.
Nunes fires back at FBI for 'spurious objections' to memo release

Well called it. Again.
False narrative just went POOF!



Nunes and his staff compiled the memo from classified material provided by the DOJ and FBI. Numerous Republicans as well as the White House have been advocating its release, which may happen this week.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: loam
a reply to: xuenchen

More fake news.

If this was a public statement, where is it?

Even the NYT plays this little trick with what they report...




F.B.I. Condemns Push to Release Secret Republican Memo

Christopher A. Wray, the F.B.I. director, clashed publicly with the president for the first time on Wednesday, condemning a push by House Republicans to release a secret memo that purports to show how the bureau and the Justice Department abused their authorities to obtain a warrant to spy on a former Trump campaign adviser.


And then continues to read:



Though Mr. Wray’s name was not attached to the statement...

Maybe it was a little buddy of McCabe's that put the 'Rare Official Statement' out?

No attribution? It could have been anyone.... right?



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: khnum

This seems like a stretch...just looking her up from the name in the letter you linked gives a pretty good interview with splc. She's a "self-proclaimed" judge, follows the "sovereign citizen" claim and has at least one alias. I'm fairly certain that any procedures that would leave the executive office without leadership for a year would be looked into by the government. If not, WOW, we have quite a backlog of corrections to make.

www.splcenter.org...’s-world



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: shooterbrody

Are we going to go through this same thing for every emailed statement from now on?

It was a statement from the FBI, emailed to media outlets. The reporter whose tweet that was happens to be a reporter for a right-leaning outlet.


Are you serious?

The FBI emailed news outlets?

I seriously doubt this is real.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: avgguy
Nunez and House intelligence issues a rebuttal to the FBI statement.

intelligence.house.gov...

Notice that this statement is attributed to an actual person!



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Its not like the memo is an adjudicated decision or something. Its an allegation based on evidence. From there, it can be investigated, im sure.

Given what we know, why on Earth would anyone oppose investigating the FBI and DOJ?


Only hardline party Democrat's don't want it investigate because they don't want the truth out


so why not wait until Mueller's report comes out?.....AND.......

given what we know, why on Earth would anyone oppose investigating Trump's involvement with Russia?.....



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Proving the NYT has abandoned all journalistic integrity and restraint of any kind.

If these lies are so easy to repeat, there must be something really important in that memo they don't want you to see.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:03 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785


Trump met with Lavrov and Kislyak in the Oval Office on May 10, the day after he fired James Comey as FBI director. Trump told the Russians that he had "faced great pressure" as a result of the investigation into Russia's interference in the 2016 US election — and whether the Trump campaign colluded with Moscow — that Comey was leading, calling him "crazy" and "a real nut job."


I'm sure he was just musing about that silly little nut job. And pressure? What pressure?



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Perfectenemy

oh wow
he is out there on this one



Regardless, it’s clear that top officials used unverified information in a court document to fuel a counter-intelligence investigation during an American political campaign.

He is accusing them of fraud.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   
Congress represents the interests of the people. The FBI doesn’t. Given the FBIs handling of the case, anything they say is suspect.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:04 PM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Nunes calls them "spurious objections" because he doesn't realize the story of the objections are fake to begin with. Of course they would look spurious to him, given the material came from them in the first place and he now thinks they objected.

Meanwhile, I bet there is some head scratching at the FBI.
edit on 31-1-2018 by loam because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:10 PM
link   

“Having stonewalled Congress’ demands for information for nearly a year, it’s no surprise to see the FBI and DOJ issue spurious objections to allowing the American people to see information related to surveillance abuses at these agencies. The FBI is intimately familiar with ‘material omissions’ with respect to their presentations to both Congress and the courts, and they are welcome to make public, to the greatest extent possible, all the information they have on these abuses. Regardless, it’s clear that top officials used unverified information in a court document to fuel a counter-intelligence investigation during an American political campaign. Once the truth gets out, we can begin taking steps to ensure our intelligence agencies and courts are never misused like this again.”


Damn!

edit on 31-1-2018 by AndyFromMichigan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:10 PM
link   
a reply to: jimmyx

there`s no reason that all of these things can`t be investigated at the same time, trumps involvement with Russia, DOJ and FBI,leaks, corruption and collusion with the DNC,etc.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: jimmyx

The investigation been a going on for 18 months now. Feel free to provide any hard evidence of any wrongdoing.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:13 PM
link   
a reply to: Perfectenemy

That one is real. Question though, I dont see any statement anywhere
from the DOJ on this. Anyone?



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:13 PM
link   
If there is no actual statement on FBI letterhead, or an email with an FBI email address....
Can this just be hoax-binned?



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: jimmyx




so why not wait until Mueller's report comes out?...

Because the foxes are running the henhouse.

There is no time to wait.



new topics

top topics



 
24
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join