a reply to: Thecakeisalie
yes I understand but I fail to see is how this "national security " in documents from the time around the 70's can possibly lead to further death or
abuse in the present or future !
and information does seem to have an expiry date especially in matters of national security because of their high level of security , things dont
remain the same for very long, for example , troop movements, locations of spies, safe houses names of operatives on active duty , these all change
and people can be protected , the funny thing is the citizens are not!
in any case its a logical fallacy so how can that be legal ! When laws rely on logic and reason!
the government in this sense are infallible because all they have to do is collude and mark anything a matter of national security , then they absolve
themselves of any wrong doing , until its forgotten about.
A Shameful display !
Lets just say as an example ,
I was the prime minister ( I know laughable) I was at a meeting about some government military operation , and the names of the top brass were
disclosed. I also at this meeting abused a waitress , and then did lines in the toilet of the cistern using tax payers money to snort it , then
afterwards at same hotel during an epic sex session strangled a prostitute to death by accident because she likes it rough.
The prostitutes body is then found later and the murder investigation ensues, I then am implicated in the murder
through some evidence or witness testimony.
However the details cant be disclosed to the public in the court as it would also mean that the names of these top officials would be disclosed and
they could then potentially come to harm as a result!(from our enemies )
But that right there is a logical fallacy because there is no guarantee that they would ever come to harm , this is not 100% certain
I am then free to live my life without ever facing trial because of national security.
However what is absolutely certain is that 1 women is dead another abused and illegal narcotics abused all using tax payers money
as opposed to " we cant say in case # happens!" to x, y or , z , but # the injustices already happened as ultimately "we are more important than you"
government nothing but #ing crooks
edit on 31-1-2018 by sapien82 because: (no reason given)