It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Second Trump-Russia dossier being assessed by FBI

page: 2
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 11:43 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

It will be a course at Will & Mary - just down the hall from ethics. Maybe comey will teach them both.

edit on 30-1-2018 by Hewhowaits because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 11:46 AM
link   
When all else fails, try again with new and better bull# and get better writers.

Yep that could work.




posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 11:59 AM
link   
Gateway Pundit is saying the FBI got the Shearer memo in October of 2016, and they didn't take it seriously because they knew that Shearer had shopped it to media outlets. So, the FBI has had it for over a year now.

I think I can figure out the game here: The Clintons/DNC had Shearer send his dossier to the FBI. FBI says "this is garbage." So the Clintons/DNC sent the same info to Steele to repackage as another dossier that "verifies" the first one. Very tricky. Also a criminal conspiracy and obstruction of justice.



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 12:04 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

The funny thing (not really) I find about this "dossier" is that Shearer says that the source is the Russian FSB.

That is the former KGB which Putin was an agent in and now controls the FSB. Can no-one else see the delicious irony in one side using information provided by foreign intelligence services (an enemy) to accuse another side of cooperation and esentially treason with the same foreigners ?

I just cannot wrap my head around this. And our feckless FBI apparently unable to investigate anyone or anything on their own and without what could and probably is mis or disinformation from a foreign intelligent service that they believe to have interfered in our election.

They apparently have had this second dossier, conveniently given to them by the writer of the first dossier since October of 2016 and still have yet to provide anything in the way of proof other than...well the Russians said it was true.

IF Trump or any of the cronies around him did anything wrong then no-one more than me wants them in jail. However this comedy show is starting to really look like exactly that.

It appears to me that someone on the off chance that Trump was an actual viable option started to work on an elaborate scheme to discredit the campaign.

However due to utter disbelief that he was ever going to get close to the nomination much an actual election, they halfway started and got caught without finishing and are now really working hard to finish something they can no longer finish.


edit on 1/30/2018 by DJMSN because: Correction



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 12:06 PM
link   
Adam schiff's new memo.

edit on 30-1-2018 by Hewhowaits because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 12:07 PM
link   
Nice going Cody you just outed yourself as a CIA Mockingbird



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: interupt42

Well if you are a true Libertarian like you *claim* to be, then you should already know the Democrat party is the biggest threat to Libertarianism.



tiktiktiktiktik



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:06 PM
link   
If a Pee Tape was actually released would you still not believe it?



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

I don't watch smut, is that what you do in your spare time?



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Hewhowaits
Adam schiff's new memo.

nice find



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

There is no pee tape.
Never was.



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Now it looks like the FBI has another "Dossier" !!

Well of course they need another one... to distract everyone from the first one.



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: Wayfarer

I don't watch smut, is that what you do in your spare time?


You didn't answer the question really? Are you saying you would refuse to watch is so that you could maintain some sort of asinine plausible deniability to decry it to the high heavens on this board?



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: dashen
a reply to: Wayfarer

There is no pee tape.
Never was.


Its just a hypothetical. Surely your ego isn't so fragile you can entertain the possibility of something existing, or are you saying you've made up your mind, evidence (weather real or not) be damned?

I'm not sure that's something I would brag about....



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: Wayfarer

I don't watch smut, is that what you do in your spare time?


You didn't answer the question really? Are you saying you would refuse to watch is so that you could maintain some sort of asinine plausible deniability to decry it to the high heavens on this board?

No, I wouldn't watch. If it was proven true it would change a lot of my beliefs. Next strawman



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: interupt42

Well if you are a true Libertarian like you *claim* to be, then you should already know the Democrat party is the biggest threat to Libertarianism.



tiktiktiktiktik



1. Just because I believe a small gov't is the best answer to a corrupted system doesn't mean I think we should fix every problem with a libertarian solution.

Not sure why people feel the need to limit themselves or have the mentality to must pick a political ideology and stick to it for every problem for infinity? I like to keep more than a hammer in my toolset.

Somethings should be market driven and some things shouldn't, it all depends on how the incentives are structured , the problems being faced, and the circumstances.

2. The republican party is just as much as a threat to Libertarianism as the democrats.

Republicans started the bailout, patriot act, the need to throw religion into gov't, and choosing big gov't over state rights like Rubio did with the GMO state right decisions,etc .





tiktiktiktiktik

Exactly when is that TOCK(arrest) coming? Certainly a resignation and firing isn't a TOCK for what these treasons scumbags deserve whether republican or democrat.

edit on 05131America/ChicagoTue, 30 Jan 2018 14:05:53 -0600000000p3142 by interupt42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 01:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Martin75

originally posted by: Wayfarer

originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: Wayfarer

I don't watch smut, is that what you do in your spare time?


You didn't answer the question really? Are you saying you would refuse to watch is so that you could maintain some sort of asinine plausible deniability to decry it to the high heavens on this board?

No, I wouldn't watch. If it was proven true it would change a lot of my beliefs. Next strawman


Well I respect you for being level headed enough to entertain the possibility of something contradicting your expected assumption. I posited it merely as a clarion call to see who in this thread had the wherewithal to adjust their expectations when presented with evidence, versus discounting evidence that contradicts it.

Also, I think you may be misusing 'straw-man' in this instance, since i'm not misrepresenting anything through a hypothetical.



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 02:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Wayfarer

TherIs convincing evidence that the pee tape was actually a prank played by 4chan on a certain dumb reporter who actually forwarded this pee fanfiction to intelligence Services which ended up in the hands of Christopher Steele
edit on 30-1-2018 by dashen because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Since when does the FBI take research done by *controversial political activists* seriously and investigate their claims?



posted on Jan, 30 2018 @ 02:22 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

I think the member simply meant the majority of the electoral college will continue to vote for the swamp to be drained and men like Trump to be in positions of power enough to do exactly that. Sheesh, you leftists and your revolution porn...




top topics



 
13
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join