It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking: The FBI and The DOJ are Now Under Investigation

page: 6
64
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 07:34 AM
link   
Looks like someone is watching the watchers after all.




posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 07:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Majic
Looks like someone is watching the watchers after all.

And the watchers don't like that one little bit.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 01:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: burntheships

What a mess these people made.

Im just glad we are fixing this before anyone got any ideas.

This was a slow take over of our government decades in the making. A century? more?

Bounce back is all I want to hear. Keep them coming. Please and thank you.



It is a huge mess, huge.



Well, it seems a lot of this goes straight back to the question of should
these agencies be allowed to operate in secret?

Secret Courts have now been exposed, and found to be corrupt.

Time to clean house in a big way, maybe even dismantle the FBI.



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:06 PM
link   
An attempt by the POTUS to discredit the organization investigating the POTUS... seems legit.


edit on 31-1-2018 by Blarneystoner because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:07 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships


That's right Schiff. And hopefully your leaking ### is behind bars in the coming months.

Resignation time, yet? We'll wait. Rumors abound on the image boards that Schiff has been fed selective information this whole time, and certain leaks may be attributable to him based on that false information. Makes sense, some had suspected this from the time the leaks first started.

I think it was readit.com or pastebin. Both are two great sites for picking up random tidbits like this. Not saying it is true, but it does have a certain logic to it.
edit on 1/31/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Blarneystoner


Yes, because POTUS knows for certain it is a witch-hunt. Since the preponderance of evidence suggests ZERO Trump involvement, it is perfectly reasonable.

Again, "norms" are just that... norms. They aren't laws. They aren't set in stone. Legally Trump is the Justice Department, and the authority of federal level law enforcement is derived directly from Presidential authority and EO. Trump can establish priorities for enforcement, hire/fire at his discretion and even close the entire FBI/DOJ (or any executive agency) if he so decided. That is solely at POTUS's discretion.

Can't hold it against the President for exercising legal authority. Once THE MEMO comes out, I believe Muellertime will be over. He can either present his evidence (which I'm betting he has none-hence the REQUEST for an interview) or admit he has nothing and that this entire thing is based on BS Democrat lies, fake outrage and misinformation. If he has something, lets see it. Otherwise, Trump's already been cleared (aka no evidence) by an FBI investigation during the campaign when the BS allegations/rumors first started flying.

(nevermind the fact that FBI/DOJ has never even actually looked at the DNC's servers, so how would they know who was really responsible?)

This is a house of cards, built on a pile of sh## based on a very sour/bitter and very angry Hillary Clinton/her sycophants. Don't know what to tell you Hillary, should've been a moderate like your husband instead of pandering to the extreme far-left. That won't win elections🤢
edit on 1/31/2018 by JBurns because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 31 2018 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: JBurns

No sir... the AG is the head of the DOJ and is the chief attorney of the US. The AG is not the POTUS' personal attorney.

BtW- the POTUS does not have legal authority to shut down the FBI or the DOJ... by EO or any other means. Stop lying.
edit on 31-1-2018 by Blarneystoner because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
64
<< 3  4  5   >>

log in

join