House intel committee votes on party lines to release the memo

Sara Carter was on Hannity tonight.
She said that her sources are telling her that McCabe had FBI agents changing 302's, and that info will be coming out in Horowitz's IG report.
If this is true, this is a horrible thing and heads need to roll.

a reply to: DBCowboy

Defending what? I already answered you.

I will and have never defended it. I believe lynch is guilty.

What I don't excuse is these morons sitting on this memo while congress was supposed to be debating the fisa program being renewed and expanded.

Do you get that?

Do you understand why that is a problem?

They wouldn't let Amash or Rand Paul bring forward bills or debate the fisa program?

If it can be manipulated anyone can do it. It's not special to one set of crooks.

originally posted by: angeldoll
I wonder what Jeff Sessions will have to say about this, or if this is some convoluted way President Snake is trying to force Sessions to quit, ya know like he's done to several others who have tried to do their jobs properly and legally.

Not likely.

The democrats tried to use fabricated evidence to frame trump for colluding with the Russians to steal the election, but he out smarted them, now they are going down and people from the DOJ and FBI are going down with them.

America dodged a bullet when Hillary lost the election.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Release it all . Lets get this over with and move on to other problems . Clean house on both sides , including the Media .

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Guess it's okay to release classified info it it helps the president.
The house minority wrote a corresponding report to accompany the memo. In an effort towards transparency the majority said...nope

Guess you're ok with classified information being released (leaked) if it hurts Trump.

a reply to: butcherguy

Who knows. Hannity?

a reply to: luthier


The FISA program is just one of thousands of "laws" that have the potential to be abused.

a reply to: luthier

I'm against FISA surveillance, too. Especially backdoor searches.
Perhaps they changed it up a bit.

originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler

originally posted by: jimmyx
good job comrades in getting possible secrets to the inner workings of the justice dept., and FBI, disclosed publicly....AND BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT!!...the kremlin is proud of you, your pal, Vladimir Putin.

What about the illegal leaks?

Your partisanship is showing.

a reply to: RadioRobert

They didn't. They created more of them. After the surveillance is taken it is databased and requires no warrant to extract.

It's readily available to view.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: luthier


The FISA program is just one of thousands of "laws" that have the potential to be abused.

That is your response.

Got it. No your right it's not outrageous that they uncovered how it can be abused and decided to not debate the subject and rush it through.


My take on it nearly mirrors the judges.

napolitano

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: butcherguy

Who knows. Hannity?

Sara Carter has been spot on with her info, unlike CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, NYT, etc......

originally posted by: butcherguy
Sara Carter was on Hannity tonight.
She said that her sources are telling her that McCabe had FBI agents changing 302's, and that info will be coming out in Horowitz's IG report.
If this is true, this is a horrible thing and heads need to roll.

Uhm, yeah. Say goodbye to the hopes and dreams of any federal case that went through that desk. No wonder Justice and the FBI are suppressing it. Everybody convicted in a case that McCabe may have overseen is going to be looking for an appeal-- even cases with no political bent. Jesus, what a mess.


Everyone on the left should be for stoning McCabe if that is true, because he just tanked the chances of any of this going anywhere.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: RadioRobert

They didn't. They created more of them. After the surveillance is taken it is databased and requires no warrant to extract.

It's readily available to view.

That has been true for some time. I haven't looked at the new authorization to compare though. Any ideas on specifics that changed?

a reply to: butcherguy

If you say so.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: butcherguy

If you say so.

God forbid you would read her reports for yourself.

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Grambler

Is there any reason Trump would not release the memo?

It is apparently full of top secret information on the FISA system, and quite possibly other 'stuff'. The GOP and Trump have just spent several years complaining about about Clinton having sensitive scheduling info on her server that MIGHT have been hacked (it wasn't though, the Government server she should have been using was hacked), so the idea that they would release top secret info like this is unthinkable (wink, wink, nudge, nudge - say no more).

originally posted by: bluechevytree
The democrats tried to use fabricated evidence to frame trump for colluding with the Russians to steal the election, but he out smarted them, now they are going down and people from the DOJ and FBI are going down with them.

America dodged a bullet when Hillary lost the election.

Nobody made trump's team meet with Russian lawyers who happen to be spies. You are delusional. Trump and his team did that all on their own and trump was warned about Flynn. Nobody framed him open your freakin eyes.


Trump in his fake news BS! That is exactly what it is to BS!

a reply to: RadioRobert

Yes. They include DNA collection, you can read the amendments. They are posted.

Link to the bill in the article.

The Nunes bill expands the statutory terms “foreign power” and “agent of a foreign power”—both of which can be approved for NSA surveillance—to include a broad set of cyber-related activities. These activities include efforts to impair the “confidentiality, integrity, or availability of computers,” so long as those activities threaten the national defense or security of the United States.

www.eff.org...