It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: visitedbythem
I imagine they have letters and markings on them.
They are likely not very old at all.
Clean them up and trace the markings to the forge they were made at.
PS: evolution is a scam to remove rights from humankind. This is why all giant skeletons are removed from the general public
Strange to find someone such as yourself on a site such as ATS . You must be a busy person attacking the sources rather then applying your great wisdom to explain these contradictory explanations . I guess the easy way out for you is to just bash the source ...great work
and people wonder why i dont take them seriously
microphotographs showed that the age-old shoe-sole print bore a well-made leather stitched by a double row of stitches. The twists of the threads are clearly visible. This finding puzzled investigators as double-stitching done with such refined threading had not been implemented by shoemakers in 1927.
One couldn’t get more opposing beliefs if one tried, and both camps adhere to their beliefs voraciously, and with unshakable fervour. Yet neither are based on any kind of factual or hard evidence.
The reality is that the origin of the human race is a total enigma. No one, anywhere, actually knows how old humanity is or how and where it originated. It is a complete mystery. Yet from birth one is indoctrinated into one or the other of the above factions, with no questions asked or alternative opinions allowed.
Personally, I don’t belong to either camp. I keep an open mind regarding our origins. I don’t have any particular “philosophy” on the subject but rather prefer to adapt my understanding as new evidence becomes available. My only current belief based upon all of the available facts to date is that the human race has inhabited this planet for millions of years longer than is presently accepted.
Pangaea was a supercontinent that existed during the late Paleozoic and early Mesozoic eras.[2][3] It assembled from earlier continental units approximately 335 million years ago, and it began to break apart about 175 million years ago.[4] In contrast to the present Earth and its distribution of continental mass, much of Pangaea was in the southern hemisphere and surrounded by a superocean.
originally posted by: the2ofusr1
a reply to: ignorant_ape
Strange to find someone such as yourself on a site such as ATS . You must be a busy person attacking the sources rather then applying your great wisdom to explain these contradictory explanations . I guess the easy way out for you is to just bash the source ...great work
and people wonder why i dont take them seriously
I also have no doubt that extraterrestrial species interfered in our evolution
originally posted by: MonarchofBooks1611
a reply to: Harte
All sources can have true and false articles in them. Its impossible to be 100% correct on big web sites with multiple writers. Don't throw out the baby with the bath water bro, calm down and don't be so triggered.
Besides, WND is not the source for pity's sake, they just reported on the people who made the discoveries. Go direxctly to the discoverers if you want to validate, or invalidate this find, don't just keyboard hero attack the web site that some of this info appeared on.
originally posted by: badw0lf
Threads like this make me
At first glance it appears an interesting topic. but that is soon sullied by the "god did it" folk.
As said above "In fact I have to believe it because scripture said it happened" and that's the extent of it all. Words written by men less than 2000 years ago is all the proof required.
We should be so much better as a species. But, if it turns out there is a god, well, he did a really bang up job with us, didn't he. You'd think the perfect being would take more pride in his work.