It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Grassley just Cooked the Dems, Read #12

page: 2
48
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:29 PM
link   
They need to build a new prison for all these people, but make it a big outdoors one like at a city zoo, then everyone can jeer at them through the bars. That would be a fitting demise for all these corrupt and despicable animals.



(post by EvidenceNibbler removed for a manners violation)
(post by EvidenceNibbler removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
They need to build a new prison for all these people, but make it a big outdoors one like at a city zoo, then everyone can jeer at them through the bars. That would be a fitting demise for all these corrupt and despicable animals.


There is one in Guantanamo Bay ...



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:43 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: JanAmosComenius

originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
They need to build a new prison for all these people, but make it a big outdoors one like at a city zoo, then everyone can jeer at them through the bars. That would be a fitting demise for all these corrupt and despicable animals.


There is one in Guantanamo Bay ...


But it isn't an outdoorsie open air public one, so that wouldn't be much fun. The public must be able to taunt them and make fun of them for their punishment to work correctly.


Edit: Or better yet, have those old fashioned stocks set up encircling the White house and fill it with all these corrupt democrats, including Hillary and Obama. Imagine the liberal outrage. CNN would self immolate.

edit on 26-1-2018 by NoCorruptionAllowed because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:45 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:52 PM
link   
Looks like you're getting nibbled down
edit on 31America/ChicagoFri, 26 Jan 2018 23:55:36 -0600Fri, 26 Jan 2018 23:55:36 -060018012018-01-26T23:55:36-06:001100000055 by TerryMcGuire because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:54 PM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

Why are you so happy about this?
Under Section 702, the NSA targets foreign individuals located outside the United States. Predictably, communications written and sent by Americans are also swept up in that collection. Those communications are then stored in a massive database that can be searched by other intelligence agencies, including the FBI and CIA. When those agencies search the data—even when it belongs to U.S. persons—they do not obtain a warrant.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryMcGuire
come on post it again. You can do it. Come on we're all waiting for it.


What is wrong with posting presidential tweets?

@realDonaldTrump is off limits?

Thats kinda strange....

Why would that be?

Who is scared of the truth?


edit on 26-1-2018 by EvidenceNibbler because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:56 PM
link   
Well then go ahead and post it again maybe it was a mistakea reply to: EvidenceNibbler



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:59 PM
link   
a reply to: TerryMcGuire

His post was about a twit where trump proudly claims that he signed this:

Under Section 702, the NSA targets foreign individuals located outside the United States. Predictably, communications written and sent by Americans are also swept up in that collection. Those communications are then stored in a massive database that can be searched by other intelligence agencies, including the FBI and CIA. When those agencies search the data—even when it belongs to U.S. persons—they do not obtain a warrant.

Though I have no idea why he is glad that this was signed?



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 12:01 AM
link   

Crazy how scary this thread is to TPTB !!

edit on 27-1-2018 by EvidenceNibbler because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

OH, the powers that be say I can post this now....


(post by EvidenceNibbler removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 12:06 AM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

Lol, I will just bow out of this thread I started now and tell you all that it's the scariest thing the left has ever seen lol.

Carry on lads, this is the one that will sink them.

THis one brought out the big guns, can't start a fire without a spark.

edit on 27-1-2018 by EvidenceNibbler because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 12:12 AM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

Soon, the liberal MSM will have no choice but to report BAD news for Obama's people (if Jeff Sessions does the right thing), and POSITIVE news for President Trump's administration.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 12:17 AM
link   

originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

Lol, I will just bow out of this thread I started now and tell you all that it's the scariest thing the left has ever seen lol.

Carry on lads, this is the one that will sink them.

THis one brought out the big guns, can't start a fire without a spark.


President Trump said that he was going to cut way back on Tweeting messages that insult people. Instead, he'll tout accomplishments that benefit our nation, and tweet "urgings" to sheepherders Schumer/Pelosi.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 12:21 AM
link   
This is the direct qoute from the part of the fisa section 702 That nibbler is talking about. The one that trump renewed.
I leave it here so you can all make up your own mind.




I N GENERAL .—Any information con- 15 cerning a United States person acquired under 16 section 702 shall not be used in evidence 17 against that United States person pursuant to 18 paragraph (1) in any criminal proceeding un- 19 less— 20 ‘‘(i) the Federal Bureau of Investiga- 21 tion obtained an order of the Foreign In- 22 telligence Surveillance Court to access such 23 information pursuant to section 702(f)(2); 24 or 25 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:49 Nov 29, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSAJSCIA~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXM ETAL7.0GENCVII_RE~1.XM L November 29, 2017 (4:49 p.m.) G:CMTEIN15RVII_REAUTH.XML g:VHLC112917112917.235.xml (681591|7) 18 ‘‘(ii) the Attorney General determines 1 that— 2 ‘‘(I) the criminal proceeding af- 3 fects, involves, or is related to the na- 4 tional security of the United States; 5 or 6 ‘‘(II) the criminal proceeding in- 7 volves— 8 ‘‘(aa) death; 9 ‘‘(bb) kidnapping; 10 ‘‘(cc) serious bodily injury, 11 as defined in section 1365 of title 12 18, United States Code; 13 ‘‘(dd) conduct that con- 14 stitutes a criminal offense that is 15 a specified offense against a 16 minor, as defined in section 111 17 of the Adam Walsh Child Protec- 18 tion and Safety Act of 2006 (34 19 U.S.C. 20911); 20 ‘‘(ee) incapacitation or de- 21 struction of critical infrastruc- 22 ture, as defined in section 23 1016(e) of the USA PATRIOT 24 Act (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)); 25 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 16:49 Nov 29, 2017 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 C:USERSAJSCIA~1APPDATAROAMINGSOFTQUADXM ETAL7.0GENCVII_RE~1.XM L November 29, 2017 (4:49 p.m.) G:CMTEIN15RVII_REAUTH.XML g:VHLC112917112917.235.xml (681591|7) 19 ‘‘(ff) cybersecurity, including 1 conduct described in section 2 1016(e) of the USA PATRIOT 3 Act (42 U.S.C. 5195c(e)) or sec- 4 tion 1029, 1030, or 2511 of title 5 18, United States Code; 6 ‘‘(gg) transnational crime, 7 including transnational narcotics 8 trafficking and transnational or- 9 ganized crime; or 10 ‘‘(hh) human trafficking. 11 ‘‘(B) N O JUDICIAL REVIEW .—A determina- 12 tion by the Attorney General under subpara- 13 graph (A)(ii) is not subject to judicial review.


This is the fisa amendments reauthorization bill in it's entirety. intelligence.house.gov...



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 12:25 AM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler


THis one brought out the big guns, can't start a fire without a spark.


If you didn't have the big guns to begin with, you shouldn't have attempted to start one without the spark.



new topics

top topics



 
48
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join