a reply to: face23785
Ok, decent point. There is a bit of murkiness in that respect. I'm going to have to consider. Though technically that's a different law broke and
is no longer pedophilia at that point... Well it can be if the child is a late bloom... er technically pedophilia is with prepubescent children, it
um different stuff if past that...
I'm personally a believer of "do what thou wilt so long as no others come to harm." Meaning as long as it does not hurt others whatever you do or
identify as is fine no matter how absurd.
As this clearly harms others, it is clearly not acceptable. If, however some adult dude identifies as a dog, and some adult girl as a cat, and for
some reason they get off on the inter-species um, well you know consent and all, I don't care how absurd it is. Two consenting adults, no one is
getting hurt besides maybe some odd rp scratching or something... I hope safe words are involved... um... continuing on.
It doesn't matter if the guy identifies as a 9 year old, he's legally an adult when compared with the actual child, and unless he can find some
consenting adult to treat him as a child and other "children" in a adults body to "play" with as a child, he's out of luck. If he can find that, then
more power to his weird creepy ass, so long as it stays between consenting adult "children", and no literally children children.
So as to where this is clearly heading I'll just deal with it now.
It is reasonable for a transgender woman to want to be identified and treated as the opposite sex. It is fair and decent to acquiesce to that request
and for such a person to be treated as such in all legal respects when it comes to work, bathrooms, etc.
It is, however, on the same hand, not acceptable for the person who has transitioned to not inform a person of their transgendered state before
engaging in a sexual relationship with them. This is due to consent. A person has a right to choose who they are and are not willing to sleep with
regardless of the reason. They have a right to not desire to be with a person who has transitioned. A person who sleeps with them without informing
them of this transition has removed that choice from the person. Which means it's impossible for that person to truly give consent. Then again I
consider it no different than someone pretending to be a rich doctor to get into some gold diggers panties. As in both cases there's a deception
going on. Though I'd argue the motivations are not completely comparable the lack of ability to give true consent is. In either case, one party knew
an aspect of their past might result in rejection and chose to purposely not disclose it, or outright lie about it in order to get what they
It sucks to identify as a woman, transitioned, but still have to do this. I creates serious mental dissonance, but there has to be true consent. No
matter how much we may feel we are women, we have transitioned, and people have a right to decide for themselves if they are willing to go along with
that romantically. There are people out there that can and will consent to such a relationship. Find another consenting adult because without true
consent there is only tragedy and unhealthy relationships going forward.
But going forward, the child is not an adult, and cannot legally consent, so the man who "identifies" as a child is still legally an adult, and if he
wishes to engage in "9 year old on 9 year old sex or anything else weird" must find another legal adult that identifies as a 9 year old to do so with
so they can both legally consent.
Now here's the weird place I know you will all be going. What if people like this push for being legally recognized as 9 year olds? Well now even if
we did accept this absurdity of premise and that it could become law they would then become either wards of the state or need a guardian, as they as 9
year olds are in the eyes of the law, children. In addition they need to deal with how they can remove an adult body and experience. Since the adult
"9" year old has "Adult" experience and an adult body, he still cannot be treated as a 9 year in terms of other 9 year old children. Why? Because
his body acts and responds differently, and his adult experience prevents him from truly having the same understanding as the actual 9 year old.
While the real 9 year is growing up learning and growing into finding out who they are, they don't identify as 9 years old, whereas he apparently has
already done all that growing up and has decided he's a 9 year old and knows who he is.
Speaking of absurdity age is not like gender, age is a number, in fact 9 years old doesn't really mean anything. Some 9 year olds are in different
grades, some have begun puberty, some have not. I mean is he identifying as a 9 year old? A prepubescent child? Someone who just started puberty?
What exactly is meant by 9 years old? Age itself is just time on this earth.
If he's identifying with the time on earth then that's clearly absurd as he's clearly been on earth longer than that. You can't just suddenly erase
years of experience and growing up. That's clearly a no, and the reason he can't truly be legally a 9 year old.
Is he identifying with being prepubescent and the more childlike innocence and play that comes with that, is behaving a playing like a child? In that
case find others like yourself who are also adults that miss those more innocent days. Set up play dates, and get together and experience what it's
like to be kids again. Build that tree fort, play hide and seek, whatever, but do it with consenting adults.
This is not to say an adult cannot play hide and seek with their child, but there's a difference in how the play occurs, in one case the adult is
clearly still an adult acting as an adult and with the care and concerns of an adult. There are clear boundaries there.
What I'm guessing is these people if we pretend they are serious want to play the "innocent" experimentation angle. "You show me yours I'll show you
mine. Let's play doctor. Hey Timmy I dare you and Joe to touch penises... Wow that's so weird... can I you know... touch it?" and all that
nonsense which would not occur in regular adult play, but "can" occur between children in that age group. Such play by adults should be only with
other consenting adults, as experience removes the true innocence and such that comes with such experimentation, not to mention the appearance of
authority the "9" year old that is both chronologically and physically an adult clearly would have in the eyes of the child, not to mention physical
superiority, which removes the ability for the child to truly consent due the appearance of authority hindering that choice.
Hmmm I'll stop here with my thoughts for now.