Pedophile identifies as 9 year old

Do what thou wilt Shall be the entirety of the law.

You think it was an accident that people have been programmed to think this way. It's only a matter of time before they use this nonsense to normalize pedophilia.

You stupid dummies to get to sit back and enjoy the fruits of your political efforts. And by dummies I think you guys all know who you are when I say that

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha

Do you think someone can really be transage? How about transrace?.

I don't see why not. Some days I feel "black", other days I feel "white", and most of the time I'm "other."

So, it think I should be able to join the Nazi Party or the White Supremacists, and they should accept me, and I should be able to join the "Black Panthers" and they should accept me. And if they don't they are both "bigots."

Then again, some times I feel quite old, at other times I think I'm still a young man, and try to do the things I used to do when I was a teenager. While in my mind, I'm sure I'm still in my youth, sometimes my body refuses to cooperate. But, that's ok, because we all know the body is dumb, and has no intelligence of its own, so it can be forgiven for not recognizing my true age, as determined by my mental attitude.

a reply to: canuckster

The problem is people don't stop at "do as thou wilt," it's "do as thou wilt so long it does no harm to others," which is where people attempting to normalize things like pedophilia keep running into roadblocks. Most rational human beings can distinguish between the difference of the lack of harm caused by what two consenting adults do in the bedroom, and the harm caused by an adult engaging in similar behavior with a child who, due to the child's inexperience, and the adults position of authority cannot truly consent.

I'm not sure why people have this inability to recognize the simple line most other human beings do between consenting adults verses things for which there cannot be real consent.

He should learn to identify as worm food in my perfect world.

a reply to: face23785

Um...it doesnt matter if you identify as a single-celled organism, you still cant commit serious crimes.

Either you're reChing EXTREMELY far to make a point, or I've lost the ability to comprehend the written word. Can you explain what you're trying to get at? Do you think because the word "identify" was used, people will think raping kids is the same as an adult choosing to live as the.opposite gender?

Where's the link? I just dont get it...

a reply to: Kandinsky

Yes! This pig bastard needs his nads removed. There are no words to describe sub humans like the guy in this op.

originally posted by: theantediluvian
a reply to: face23785

Guess who owns this?

The guy who molested an 8 year-old? If he said that he was just trying to Make America Great Again would the President and his followers own it? How many "virtue signalling" members of the religious Right have turned out to be sex predators?

Who "owns" that? The Right? Organized religion?

I will stop reading right here.
What is wrong with you?
This has nothing to do with politics.

originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: face23785

Um...it doesnt matter if you identify as a single-celled organism, you still cant commit serious crimes.

Either you're reChing EXTREMELY far to make a point, or I've lost the ability to comprehend the written word. Can you explain what you're trying to get at? Do you think because the word "identify" was used, people will think raping kids is the same as an adult choosing to live as the.opposite gender?

Where's the link? I just dont get it...

Prepare to read eleven pages of that logic.

How long until Riley Dennis is making a YouTube video calling us all bigots from not handing our kids over to paedos to satisfy their sick lifestyle?

I'm sorry, but I have two sons aged 4 and 6,and even looking at them in the wrong way would be proceeded by me garrotting (spelling unsure) them in full public view whilst beating off anyone that tried to stop me! Then I would carry on doing it in prison to every other dirty low life child predator I crossed paths with.

This better not be the start of the normalisation of paedophilia, or I will go to war personally with all politicians who advocate it and wipe them out without fear of repercussion!

Sorry peeps, but this has my blood boiling so much its evaporating through my skin.

a reply to: NerdGoddess

Doc Martin's??? c'mon dude they'll only slow you down.

Claiming to be a nine year old is bogus, I have so many mental problems that the specialists were throwing darts to figure out what the problem is.

The dude sounds like a pyschopath, and they are very good liars-I should know because I might be one, but I might be a noble pyschopath.

originally posted by: Skywatcher2011
a reply to: GuidedKill

hahahahahah...oh man

Its the abvderfhijklmnopqrstivwxyz movement

originally posted by: face23785
Had to know this was coming.

Trans-age: Pedophile charged with abusing 3 girls says he's a 9 year old trapped in a man's body

A Chicago man accused of sexually assaulting two six-year-olds and an eight-year-old on repeated occasions, told police officers that he's really "a 9-year-old trapped in an adult's body," prosecutors revealed on Wednesday.

he eight-year-old was assaulted while her family stayed with Roman for 10 weeks, starting in October of 2016. According to prosecutors, the girl's mother worked a shift at night and Roman would take care of the children. During one of the attacks, two of the victim's younger siblings were watching a movie on a cellphone in the same room, say prosecutors.

The other six-year-old victim was allegedly assaulted while she slept in his home for one year, from January of 2017 to the present month.

[sarcasm]Now, don't condemn him. If you do, you're a bigot right? He has the right to "identify" as whatever he feels like he is. Obviously he's biologically an adult male, but you can't go by that, or you're a bigot. Biology is irrelevant. Feelings are what's important.[/sarcasm]

Guess who owns this?

Oh, really? An age-fluid individual? Someone should have given him some "de-ageing" medication for him to better fit in his perceived self.

Just as everyone is eager to gender reassign every baby and the kitchen sink as soon as they exit the womb.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Abysha

So basically, your personal willingness to accommodate trans-ideology stops at transgender?

OK, then at Google, you would be labeled a hateful bigot just like you like to label those of us who don't try to stop you from being what you are but maybe don't want our children to share the locker room with kids who aren't a biological gender match to them.

See at Google, they do have an employee who is a yellow-winged dragonkin and an ornate, expansive building all at the same time, a dual persona or something, and that person gave a lecture on how you should address and interact with both of them because they are all there.

So what do you do? Since you've indicated now that that person does not exist as such, you've outed yourself as a bigot?

I've read through this whole thread and I was most interested reading your back and forth with the above person, who was engaging with you up until this post.

I was actually really looking forward to seeing the reply to this because I think you've hit upon a really interesting point here (in spite of the rather confrontational tone of your reply there) and I was curious what their response would be.

Unfortunately, it would seem the other poster has opted to side-step answering this post. They are still in the thread, they posted a couple of pages after you did. It's a shame because it was an interesting exchange.

I think if you take out the emotional responses to these things and look at it from the point of view of consistency of thinking/belief, self-justification, personal values, societal values etc then there's a very interesting discussion to be had.

originally posted by: dogstar23
a reply to: face23785

Um...it doesnt matter if you identify as a single-celled organism, you still cant commit serious crimes.

Either you're reChing EXTREMELY far to make a point, or I've lost the ability to comprehend the written word. Can you explain what you're trying to get at? Do you think because the word "identify" was used, people will think raping kids is the same as an adult choosing to live as the.opposite gender?

Where's the link? I just dont get it...

Who will hijack the transgender/whatever phoria community to selfishly escape severe punishment for a crime. And who will fall for it.

You'd think that just pleading insanity would be enough to get cushy digs for the rest of your life, But how long did Chelsea Manning serve of her 30 year sentence? Bearing in mind she came out as Trans a day before sentencing.

a reply to: Indrasweb

The difference is, a human is born with a biological sex and develops a gender identity in the brain that usually matches that sex. The medical community has found that in rare instances, the gender identity developed in the brain is opposite from the biological sex. We are still talking human traits of gender and sex.

Buildings are never human traits, and dragons are never human traits. Imagining that you don't have human traits is a totally different diagnosis.

Having said that, as long as a person who identifies as a dragon isn't hurting anyone, I will give them the same kindness and respect I give everyone else. I won't bully them or taunt them by calling them freaks, or try to hurt them.

That's my take on it anyway.

a reply to: kaylaluv

I completely agree that there is no excuse for taunting or bullying someone because of their beliefs or ideas.

The point I suppose is that whose to say that there isn't a biological basis for someone believing they're a different age to what they are, or race?

ETA: Or being sexually attracted to children for that matter. And, whilst you may say "well, as long as they don't act on it", can you honestly say that, as long as they don't do anything then they can be openly attracted to children and we would/should just accept it in the same way we accept homosexuality for example?

Perhaps it's simply a lack of research and understanding? Just because you mightnot be able to produce evidence yet doesn't mean it's not there, just that it hasn't been subjected to the same scrutiny as say transgender.

At one time, there was no research into the transgender thing and so people assumed it was just a belief (and plenty will still argue that). They would have pointed to the lack of evidence in order to support their argument.

You and many others would have fought against that and encountered many people who strongly disagreed, many of who were labelled as bigots (or other meaningless buzzwords) because of their lack of acceptance and understanding.

I suppose the point here is, what makes you think that you are now not the ignorant bigots who don't/won't understand or accept that there is a biological/neurological reason for people believing they are trans racial or whatever?

The cult of oneupmanship in relation to 'tolerance' has, and will continue, to throw up some difficult questions, contradictions and paradoxes.

I'm not arguing that the man in this OP is anything other than a criminal. However, the questions that this article and some posters here raise are legitimate and cannot (and certainly should not) simply be ignored and dismissed. You cannot bully the questions into going away (as some here have attempted to do by using personal insults and derogatory labels).

Just because you may not feel the questions are legitimate does not mean that others feel the same way, or that you are correct. And, interestingly, that brings us full circle to "if I feel that xyz is true then you have no right to tell me otherwise".

a reply to: Indrasweb

If someone genuinely identifies as a child, then they will live as a child 24/7. They will speak as a child, think like a child and react like a child every waking moment, and they will be incapable of living independently. That diagnosis is mental and emotional retardation. If someone knows they are not a child but likes pretending to be one sometimes because it turns them on, that is a sexual fetish.

Neither of these situations is comparable to having gender dysphoria.

As far as race identity, there is no evidence that race has the same brain-level identity development that gender does, but who knows...science may prove me wrong someday. And if the medical community does find that this is the case, at least I am willing to accept it. Are you?

a reply to: kaylaluv

Well, kind of. More like, I would be pretty apathetic either way. Though my acceptance, or lack thereof, is really irrelevant. If they decide that trans racial is a 'real thing' then, so what? It has no bearing on my life and doesn't affect me in the slightest.

Now, question to you:

If they find that paedophilia is inherent in the same way as homosexuality or transgender then will you accept that?

Assuming they do not act on it, do you believe we should tolerate that? Should we afford those afflicted the same respect, compassion and understanding as those who are gay or transgender?
Will you fight against prejudice, bullying and discrimination against paedophiles?

Honest question.

ETA: and there are those who are trans who do not live 24/7 as a woman/act like a woman, react like a woman at all times so I'm not sure that's really much of a gold standard for determining who is "legitimate" and who is not.

By saying "well, if they were REALLY "xyz" then they would do "ABC" then you are imposing your own standards and beliefs on how others define themselves.

Would that not be unacceptable for me to do in relation to someone who says they're transgender? If I said "well, no, I say you're not because if you were you'd do "ABC". Would that not be viewed as bigoted and intolerant?
If I say "well you can't REALLY be gay as you're not having sex with men" that would be viewed as ignorant and discriminatory no? I could probably lose my job over a comment like that. Just because someone doesn't meet YOUR standards of legitimacy doesn't mean you can disregard them or demonstrate a lack of tolerance.

a reply to: Indrasweb

You keep moving the goal posts, but okay, here is my honest answer.

Because pedophilia involves children and not consenting adults, this is a much more sensitive issue. Do I think we should automatically imprison or execute someone who claims to be sexually attracted to children but has never acted on it? No. Do I think we should allow them to work in schools or be Boy Scout Masters? Absolutely not. Do I think we should regularly monitor them and their internet habits? Yes.

My reasons for this? I know how hard it is for a gay person to live their life never acting on their attractions. I imagine a pedophile would have an equally hard time. Because pedophilia involves children, we cannot simply accept it in our society.

Do you see the HUGE difference between pedophilia and homosexuality/heterosexuality?

a reply to: face23785

Liberal hypocrisy incoming.