It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: kurthall
He considered it and didn't. Your point? That doesn't bother me. Obama considered illegally spying on US citizens and did. The FBI considered letting Hillary off before they even investigated and did. They considered being used as a political tool and became one.
Why are you focused on what didn't happen rather than what did?
originally posted by: kurthall
NEW VIDEO LINK........
This thread, is not to debate, if the president has the right to do so. What this thread IS about, to show how many times trump lies....What can you say to defend him on this one? He said FAKE NEWS,FAKE NEWS. Its not fake news, and never has been. Please people stop defending this liar. The fact trump is trying to discredit our INTEL, and people believing him, is scary!
This thread is referring to a story reported by The New York Times, so it really doesn't matter if Hannity says "maybe" its already been published, as fact.
www.nytimes.com...
trump, did this to himself, and he continues to dig his hole deeper. This is not about bodily fluids on a blue dress. This is about the POTUS, completely lying to the American people, about an institution that is meant to protect the American people. NOT OKAY.
Here it is for you to see, Hannity going on, and on about how trump did NOT, want to fire Muller, and yada, yada, yada, then live on the air, he gets conformation that it is indeed TRUE. Of coarse he then changes his tune. I could not find the video on youtube. Its right there, you can all watch him say it.
How many of you said this was not true. You need to check yourselves, stop believing everything trump says!
For those of you using the "Might" Hannity had just been going on and on about it being Fake News, then on live TV they informed him it was true. How would you react, he was completely unprepared for that.
“So we have sources tonight just confirming to Ed Henry that yeah, maybe, Donald Trump wanted to fire the special counsel for a conflict. Does he not have the right to raise those questions?” Hannity said before flipping over to high-speed car crash in Arizona.
There is a video of Hannity in this link.
www.mediaite.com...
another source
www.yahoo.com...
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: GuidedKill
and?
trump is lying agan - that doesn't concern you?
why lie about it? he is such a damn puss.
the hannity video is hilarious. we'll talk about it tomorrow. lol
legally he can fire mueller for his conflicts if he desired to and its legal to do so BUT so long as he does not stop th einvestigation doing so.
(d) The Special Counsel may be disciplined or removed from office only by the personal action of the Attorney General. The Attorney General may remove a Special Counsel for misconduct, dereliction of duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or for other good cause, including violation of Departmental policies. The Attorney General shall inform the Special Counsel in writing of the specific reason for his or her removal.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: kurthall
While you are hand wringing over the words, others are pissed at proven actions.
The FBI hasn't had credibility in years, if ever. To pretend that they did is just perpetuating a myth. You don't burn a building full of living women and children when you are credible as LEO.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
Hmm...in the old reality, "maybe" was not even remotely synonymous with "confirmed". Is anyone else out there experiencing this Mandela Effect??
Reading comprehension. Get some. 😹😹😹
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: burgerbuddy
We can add using the IRS as a political tool. Something that actually happened and liberals talked less about than a thought Trump had and didn't do.
This thread is referring to a story reported by The New York Times, so it really doesn't matter if Hannity says "maybe" its already been published, as fact.
originally posted by: knoxie
a reply to: ColdWisdom
doesn't make it false either..
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: burgerbuddy
We can add using the IRS as a political tool. Something that actually happened and liberals talked less about than a thought Trump had and didn't do.
But it gets even worse. Boyd goes on that in a few instances the DOJ has consulted with Mueller’s office and he made some redactions:
originally posted by: Justoneman
originally posted by: tigertatzen
Hmm...in the old reality, "maybe" was not even remotely synonymous with "confirmed". Is anyone else out there experiencing this Mandela Effect??
Reading comprehension. Get some. 😹😹😹
X files last week the "Mandela Affect" was the Joseph "Mengele Affect".
But whatever it's called I can add just plain old lack of understanding of reality has a name. People choose to be tools when they are allowed a peek at the truth and a chance to discern when it isn't being used.
Don't be a tool of corruption.