It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

So, a peer reviewed journal article stating...

page: 21
21
<< 18  19  20    22  23 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 20 2018 @ 03:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

Again I have done so in the past. You ignored it. Do your own work sucker!



(post by Raggedyman removed for a manners violation)

posted on May, 20 2018 @ 08:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Woodcarver

Really, really
Is that your best argument, nature is a journal article

Well done you, you must have gone to the Phage and noindie science school πŸ˜†πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜„πŸ™€πŸ˜‚πŸ˜



Lol. Showin off all them extra smarts from jesus?



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 08:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Woodcarver

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: Woodcarver

Really, really
Is that your best argument, nature is a journal article

Well done you, you must have gone to the Phage and noindie science school πŸ˜†πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜„πŸ™€πŸ˜‚πŸ˜



Lol. Showin off all them extra smarts from jesus?


Sadly woodie, I asked for a peer reviewed journal article, not a link to a site with journal articles
There is a difference and so far after 20 odd pages, you and your friends have offered nothing at all, not a thing

Yes I made a mistake in my answer, I assumed, but I ammstill requesting that journal article
Still, after 21 pages, asking that you show me the science
The scientific method

You can make fun of me that's fine

I can and will make fun of your lack of science of your faith, your nonsense and hate for true science and the method



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

And here is where you miss the point yet again. You must be a Storm trooper
You can find the articles you want, at that site with journal articles.

Now here is the hard part.

You must read, and be able to understand those articles.

As such you never read the articles, and it is an open point about your ability to understand the contents. As you've never actually engaged, into discussion of the science.

Quite simply, if you can't engage in the discussion in good faith, no one should be engaging you in good faith.

quod erat demonstrandum



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 09:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

Youngling your above post perfectly sets out your lack of intellect.

1. Noinden has repeatedly for most likely years now has said that he is not an Atheist, but a Theist.
2. Your link does not refer to journal articles. These are not qualified people making these creationist claims.
3. We are arguing a scientific theory that was created by a Christian!!. Not an Atheist!

You do see that asinine position you have taken?

Master Coomba
edit on 27-5-2018 by coomba98 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: coomba98

1/ Don't care what noinden is or is not, it's not about him

2/I don't care, don't understand what you are on about

3/It's not about who created the theory, I am asking for scientific evidence to justify the theory

Why is that hard to understand, master of ignorance?



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 11:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Noinden

You offered nothing of relevance, you are a joke, as were your articles
And they had to be because other evolutionists time and time again in this very thread have admitted none exist, foolish boy



posted on May, 27 2018 @ 11:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

1. Yet you call him an Atheist all the time. What do you call someone who is repeatedly being told the truth and yet totally refuses to talk in that knowledge?
2. You link to the creationist website with supposed peer reviewed articles. You cant be that forgetful. But then again I am talking to a Padawan.
3. You dont understand what you are asking for which has been explained to you on many many many occasions.

Master Coomba of Ignorance.
(For I know very little of the totality of human knowledge, [hence ignorant for those who only have homeschool education])



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 12:43 AM
link   
a reply to: coomba98


1/ my apologies, atheist or not I was just generalising, I am interested in the question, not the person. I am constantly being told I was homeschooled when I was not. Doesn't bother me, toughen up princesses or find another thread

2/ my mistake, did I say peer reviewed, I meant they cited scientists, oops, it happens

3/ I understand what I am asking, you havnt read the many evolutionists who have stated in this very thread that there are no articles

You are flogging your own dead horse over and over and over

I asked a loaded question and you are still trying to answer a question that can't be answered
There are no journal articles, peer reviewed, that was established a dozen pages ago, yet you are still going on
Established by other evolutionists, move on, you can't show me a peer reviewed article, they don't exist, that was my whole point

What's wrong with you

20 plus pages, you are bleeding dry



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 01:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

1a: Your not sorry and you are most definitely interested in the person, otherwise why do you concentrate all your effort into attacking them and not the issue. Very childish behavior.
1b: Your constantly being told you were homeschooled because you said you were years ago to me!!! As a musician I have a good memory.
2: Ill take that, given you rarely admit a mistake.
3: There are articles which have been given, however you totally disregard how science works. Like ive brought up on a few occasions, it does not matter which scientific theory you choose, said theory is not 100% proven. However the natural phenomena the theory is trying to explain is in fact a fact. Yet you stick to only evolution like thats all that matters.

The thing thats wrong with 'you' is, is you have very little learning experience thereby having a difficult time learning things that are outside of your worldview.

Your posts make this clear as day.

Master Coomba of Ignorance.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 01:33 AM
link   
a reply to: coomba98

I wasn't homeschooled, mr musician with an awesome memory...

I was considering addressing your silly post but

If you have a journal article that would be great

If you have other indicators that prove evolution, go get them. Let me know



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 01:41 AM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman



I wasn't homeschooled, mr musician with an awesome memory...


So you lied then.

Besides I doubt im the only one to remember. This was post Padawan #1.

Master Coomba of Ignorance.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 01:55 AM
link   
a reply to: coomba98

I am more interested in the answer to the op, not listening to you
Funny isn't it, you use homeschooling as a weapon, you are such a nice guy



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 02:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman


Funny isn't it, you use homeschooling as a weapon, you are such a nice guy


Im only nice to nice people and strangers who deserve the benefit of the doubt.

You, are most certainly not a nice person which you yourself prove along daily.

Master Coomba of Ignorance.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 02:50 AM
link   
a reply to: coomba98

See the bit you cut out was the important bit

The answer to the question I posed



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 03:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman



I am more interested in the answer to the op, not listening to you


What that part? No need to answer that cause its a facade. You are not only listening to me but responding.

Pretty sweet hey


Master Coomba of Ignorance.



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 10:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
3/It's not about who created the theory, I am asking for scientific evidence to justify the theory


I'm still waiting for your refutation of JUST ONE of these 30+ pieces of evidence. I can't count the amount of times I've posted this. You've been ignoring it for years.

talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 12:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Barcs

apparently "talkorigins" doesn't make the cut on his reading list...

Thus he will not even bother to look

Fake science and wanna be scientists... ya know?

Peter Vlar concurred with his ass cessment... and made Alice cry


www.abovetopsecret.com...


edit on 28-5-2018 by Akragon because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2018 @ 01:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: Barcs

apparently "talkorigins" doesn't make the cut on his reading list...

Thus he will not even bother to look

Fake science and wanna be scientists... ya know?

Peter Vlar concurred with his ass cessment... and made Alice cry


www.abovetopsecret.com...



Yet inbesuteous fits of irony, he liberally cites AIG and provides endless experiments in quote mining as if it’s the icing on his coup de grace cake. I love the good tunes to be had here on ATS!



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 18  19  20    22  23 >>

log in

join