It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lathroper
My thoughts about alleged alien reverse engineering is that it is a mythical creation. To reverse-engineer anything you have to have a sample and since we're probably talking about UACs (Unidentified Aerial Craft), I don't accept that anyone has access to one. I don't accept that such craft have crashed or been captured. So no reverse-engineering of such craft has ever been done.
Nothing in my life has ever led me to accept that we've made any giant leaps in technology that has not evolved from trial and error.
Unlike you, I don't accept that humans have had any hand resulting in UFOs. No one knows what they are, where they come from, where they go, what kind of being (if any) pilots them or if they are RCVs and if they are indeed remote controlled where is the controller and since there are varieties of "craft" are all of the controllers of one "race", etc., etc.
I don't take sides, just unknowing. My various sightings only prove (to me) that humans have not developed the kind of brain power to create anything like UFOs. Every mechanical thing humans have produced is primitive compared with the abilities of UFOs.
I cannot offer a lucid explanation, or even a mildly satisfying one, because UFOs are unexplainable, just marveled at.
originally posted by: Maverick7
Just a data point. You can't reverse-engineer something without knowing the methods of production.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: NoCorruptionAllowed
The MSM can't even correctly identify a 737 from an A380, and you want them to cover something that most hard core aviation people barely understand, let alone know about?