It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama Lawyering Up?

page: 6
80
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 08:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: hoss53
Obama lawyering up. "Really". Proof please. Or have you been watching to much Hannity. The raving lunatic.



Obama has been lawyering up since he left office.




posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 08:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: darkbake
I wouldn't trust this guy QAnon, he sounds like he has ulterior motives and is trying to manipulate people with fabrications. The fact that he seems to be very sophisticated with his methodology only makes him more dangerous, not more trustworthy.



What's the matter? You don't think 4chan, Reddit and twitter are legitimate news outlets?

Then try Alex Jones the guy saving us from the globalist.







edit on 24-1-2018 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 08:39 PM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

I don't think there is such a thing as a legitimate news outlet. There are fragments of truth scattered among piles of dung. You work as a critical thinker is to sift through tons of crap and come to your own conclusions.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
a reply to: olaru12

I don't think there is such a thing as a legitimate news outlet. There are fragments of truth scattered among piles of dung. You work as a critical thinker is to sift through tons of crap and come to your own conclusions.



I see no reason not to believe everything coming out of Fox news. It's Trumps favorite and that's good enough for me....





posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: Revolution9
a reply to: MRuss
Neither Trump, Obama nor Hillary will ever be indicted for anything. Wake up you silly lot.


The thing people miss is that, when you're above the law, you can't break the law.

Anyone in the position of President, has to be able to make decisions in the interests of "National Security", where the law doesn't apply, because "security" comes first. The President could order the murder of someone in the interests of "National Security" and could never be charged for ordering that murder. So, if the President can have you killed, without worry about any law, how are you going to arrest and charge the president for something?

All the ex-presidents are above the law. Never has any one of them gone to jail. Even the crooked-ist of the crooked, Richard Nixon, saw no jail time.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 08:52 PM
link   
a reply to: darkbake

You might be right about that and I’m totally willing to accept this is likely disinformation.

Giving it time but I’m starting to have my doubts.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 08:55 PM
link   
a reply to: AMPTAH

Have any sitting Congressmen gone to jail?



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 09:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
a reply to: olaru12

I don't think there is such a thing as a legitimate news outlet. There are fragments of truth scattered among piles of dung. You work as a critical thinker is to sift through tons of crap and come to your own conclusions.



I see no reason not to believe everything coming out of Fox news. It's Trumps favorite and that's good enough for me....






Well you know they have the advantage of being the underdog, they are outnumbered by the clearly liberal/leftist bias of CNN, MSNBC, and all the rest of the bought and paid for lamestream media outlets.

I'm not saying they are any better, I'm saying they can leverage their disadvantage.

If it's one mistake the globalists have made, it's overestimating the gullibility of the American public. They thought their decades of programming had worked completely. I don't think it worked completely as designed, it was effective but not completely so.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 09:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
a reply to: olaru12

I don't think there is such a thing as a legitimate news outlet. There are fragments of truth scattered among piles of dung. You work as a critical thinker is to sift through tons of crap and come to your own conclusions.



I see no reason not to believe everything coming out of Fox news. It's Trumps favorite and that's good enough for me....






How about CNN and MSNBC? Are they legit? You only mention Fox in a reply to a post that didn't mention Fox, or any other outlet for news.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 10:17 PM
link   
No Holder?




posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 01:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
a reply to: intrptr

I don't think he ever passed the bar.


Wait, Skepti... if he taught constitutional law somewhere,
even as an adjunct professor: and didn't have to even pass the
BAR exam to get ticketed to teach... my brain hurts.

I must somehow GUESS engineering curriculum are different somehow:
but as a rule of thumb I did a little homework before signing on to any
electives if the honcho didn't at least have a state P.E. license on profile.
(n. pro engineer, test every 5 yr.). It is a little insurance against bad stuff
happening when you're doing load calcs for [building] floor capacity,
et cetera. We have to show our work to a lot of smart, picky guys/gals.
And boy they can count good.

Consequently, and strictly O-T;
If O was and is a lawyer he'd be wise to lawyer up even if he's
innocent. He seems like a consti-philosopher at best-- and this
wicket looks sticky enough to retain a criminal defense monster
with guts of beta titanium. And maybe due to some of the stuff
'bama got away with PUBLICLY, the barrister should sport some horns.

I so dearly would enjoy a lot of these people actually causing their
champions to earn their salt... but I'm old and desperate. NOT



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 01:08 AM
link   
He and Michelle both had licences and were in good standing before the BAR at one time. It gets a bit fuzzy after that depending on who you talk to. They have both had a voluntary surrender (years apart, not at the same time). Means nothing. Probably.
edit on 25-1-2018 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 01:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: network dude

originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: MRuss

I guess that we'll wait and see--it's tough to decipher what's actually happening right now.

On one hand (mainly here on ATS), you have myriad threads showing how the whole Mueller investigation is beginning to crumble and redirect itself back on wrongdoings by Dems and associated parties.

On the other, you have the MSM talking about how Trump is in the crosshairs of Mueller and they act like everything is still going according to the presumed plan.

At this point for me, it's become a waiting game, as jumping to conclusions at this point will yield nothing but unproven speculation. It'll be interesting to see, though, so I've got my popcorn in the machine and am at the ready for the show...



Watching GMA this morning, you would have no idea any of the stuff on ATS even existed. They have been talking about how Mueller is going to "go after Trump", somehow. No mention of the missing text messages, the revelations with the FBI bias, the found text messages with former special council members, nothing. If I didn't check here or Drudge, I would have no idea any of this was happening, and it seems that is the plan. At some point, refusing to cover actual news stories might fall into the fake news category wouldn't it? Just manipulating public opinion by omitting facts.

BTW, who loves ya baby.

Would you be sure I bea swamper if I didn't tell ya Telly?
I really am starting to believe the PTB are noticing the
narrative is failing to convince even the stereotypical
drooling mouth-breathers (see ME: and I don't have
plaque psoriasis 't*ALL y'all)
.
rant/
What did Brad Sherman say.' ..blood in the streets'
maybe Lew Black's 'GIANT ticks EVERYWHERE!!'
Just maybe we've been trained to laugh off even caustic
but necessary hyperbole with the same jaundiced guts as
a real joke.

I still hate like hell paying for the REAL jokers' tab too.
And I don't think our esteemed congressman from
California was railing too little, back when the bailout
was on the other foot. The joke is surreal and far from
funny:
and my hallucinations include hearing the clatter of
muskets in sundry corners other than my own. Four too
many cents on the cracker barrel and a century late.
Sorry, it's now early and the java's wearing off /rant



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 02:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: MRuss
a reply to: Revolution9

Wow!

Quite the rant there!

If you are truly on the side of truth and enlightenment, you’d be secure in your argument and not quite so...angry!

The libs are running scared. So they’re going to be insulting the rest of us and trolling our threads.

Instead of making this a democratic/republican thing, how about sticking up for your fellow man? For our right to freedom and liberty. Our right to an honest government.


I see he challenged but never returned to meet the challenge?

What exactly is he trying to challenge I wonder?

"I CHALLENGE YOU! DRAW YOUR BLADE SIR!" "wait one moment just hve to go to the bathroom really quick" *slips off never to be seen again*

LoL so brave



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 02:21 AM
link   
a reply to: derfreebie


You sir/madam, ARE UNIQUE. The variety of personalities in this forum is a wonderful thing to behold.



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 05:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: AMPTAH

originally posted by: olaru12
I get it now....

When Trump lawyers up it's because he is innocent and being attacked.

When Obama lawyers up it's because he is guilty.



Obama is black, so he's guilty before being proven innocent.

Trump is white, so he's innocent before being proven guilty.

That's the rule, isn't it?




I suppose you would think like that if you were a raging racist, but if you are normal, Obama's amount of skin pigmentation isn't really a factor. Do you have problems going through life as a racist?



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 05:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: SkeptiSchism
a reply to: intrptr

Ah yah I was just joking, says here he billed 3,723 hours with a law firm from 1993 to 2004, so that's 3,723 billable hours over 11 years, or almost 340 hours of billable time per year.



The law firm says Obama logged 3,723 billable hours during his tenure from 1993 to 2004, most of it during the first four years.
articles.latimes.com...

I guess he did pass the bar exam but his productivity as a lawyer is questionable.



As President too. Lawyers are liars, he must be better (at lying) than most to get in the oval office... twice.

The higher up you go the bigger scumbag you have to be.

Edit: How he continued the Bush Cheney wars and managed to get the Nobel Peace Prize...

Priceless.
edit on 25-1-2018 by intrptr because: Edit:



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 05:57 AM
link   
a reply to: MRuss

Lolllll



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 06:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: Stevenjames15
a reply to: NOprah

The Trump base pretty much gets ALL their fake news from social media. You can't be serious? There is brainwashing on both sides of the spectrum. However most of the Trump base is by far the most brainwashed group of voters in American history. The stories that come out are so damn fake and misconstrued they are almost comical. Keep chasing that rabbit.


Well if you paid attention to the sickening bias presented by MSM you would turn to other formats. Social media (albeit far from perfect) is the best option for Trump supporters as they can 'compare notes'. What the # else are they meant to do?

All Trump supporters can do is search, search and search for what they believe is the truth, because the left leaning MSM is rotten to the core. As far as governing is concerned, Trump has done absolutely nothing to indicate he is corrupt. In fact the only thing he has done is fight tooth and nail against an insanely biased media and an obstructionist opposition.

What are you going to do IF it breaks on the MSM that Trump and his base was right all along? Blame it on the Russians? What if the OP's post is correct and Barrack is getting ready to plead 'not guilty'? What if the memo actually DOES contain damaging revelations for the dems? What if that memo drops tomorrow? Honestly what would you do? Would you apologise to everyone you have slated for being 'the most brainwashed group of voters in American history'?
edit on 1/25/18 by angryhulk because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 06:57 AM
link   
a reply to: angryhulk

The most comical thing here is the absoluteness of position.

While i may enjoy the federal cicrus, ill enjoy the enormous let down in the end even more. 4 possible outcomes, all have at least one group dining on crow. It will be a feast to behold.







 
80
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join