It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Grambler
These are all in reference to Comey's tenure. Can you provide an example of Mueller and his team saying they have not and or won't look into the server?
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Grambler
These are all in reference to Comey's tenure. Can you provide an example of Mueller and his team saying they have not and or won't look into the server?
Hahahahaha!!!
I think that had the fbi or mueller changed their mind and did look at the server, that they would have announced that.
To ask me to prove a negative is ridiculous.
Secondly, why would they wait so long? Isnt solving russian meddling the most important thing?
Lastly, even if that was the case, you still admit that the FBI did not look at the server, which is damning. This shows that the FBI, and the DNC were not interested in getting to the bottom of Russian influence, but were instead interested in pushing a narrative to hurt trump.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I was going to post that article. We're at a point where we need to enact an "Online First Amendment" that prohibits entities like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube from discriminating based on political orientation (real or perceived). This is censorship, plain & simple.
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I was going to post that article. We're at a point where we need to enact an "Online First Amendment" that prohibits entities like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube from discriminating based on political orientation (real or perceived). This is censorship, plain & simple.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Grambler
Again, can you show me where Comey said this, or is the above merely your assumptions on the matter?
FBI Director James Comey on Wednesday defended his decision to tell Congress that he was reopening the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails with less than two weeks before Election Day, and said not telling Congress would have been a big mistake.
"Concealing, in my view, would be catastrophic," Comey told the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Why did FBI Director James Comey shock Washington on Friday with an announcement that the FBI “has learned of the existence of emails” related to Hillary Clinton’s private email server, and what does it mean?
The truth is Comey didn’t have a choice. Because the new information followed his sworn testimony about the case, Comey was obligated by Department of Justice rules to keep the relevant committees apprised.
Under oath Comey had stated that the bureau had completed its review. Once he learned that there were new emails that required examination, Comey had to notify Congress that he had to amend his testimony because it was no longer true.
Comey’s letter to congressional committee chairs doesn’t say his agents have discovered new witnesses or documents suggesting a criminal act occurred. Rather, he only suggests that evidence that has not yet been examined needs to be reviewed because it is relevant to the case.
There’s also a political dimension. Had Comey not told Congress and it emerged after the election that new materials had come into its possession, the director and his entire agency’s credibility might have been questioned.
originally posted by: jimmyx
originally posted by: AndyFromMichigan
I was going to post that article. We're at a point where we need to enact an "Online First Amendment" that prohibits entities like Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube from discriminating based on political orientation (real or perceived). This is censorship, plain & simple.
so....if thousands of tweets came from Russia accusing YOU of child molestation and they went out to all of your friends, would you call it censorship if twitter took them down?
originally posted by: JAY1980
I will give them credit for their persistence...
But much like a dog humping a beach ball I can't really show much sympathy for such levels of ignorance.
Most leftists still pushing this narrative need to seek mental help.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler
You know what happens when you assume right?
Yes.
I apologize for giving you the benefit of the doubt as a reasonable person that would view all thing pushed by Russian bots with skepticism.
I won't make that mistake again.