It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

EXCLUSIVE: Peter Strzok’s Lawyer Donated $416,000 to Hillary Clinton in 2016

page: 4
34
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 11:58 AM
link   
a reply to: AboveBoard

Yeah I saw that and took note. If it's confirmed to be false info or there's no supporting documentation then this needs to hit the hoax bin.


My reply wasn't about the attorney, however, but a response to Woo's post and faulty assertions.




posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 12:31 PM
link   
The FEC has these same numbers on their website.

This is probably where the article got the numbers.

(Always Trust the Gov websites)


FEC Boies -- Hillary Victory Fund $416,100

search "Hillary Victory Fund"

Boies

2015-2016


edit on Jan-24-2018 by xuenchen because: .onQ.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 12:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: AboveBoard
a reply to: The GUT

Hey GUT. I think the source in the OP is a lie. See my post above. The numbers they are claiming do not exist on the FEC reporting site that I can find anyway.

Plus it’s sourced from a random blog???

I dunno. Shady source and info don’t make for truth.



See post above

FEC confirms




posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 12:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Did you know that Comey recently lawyered up?

Word has it his immunity deal was yanked due to
his falling out with Mueller over lies.

Hmmm

Dems are only getting desperate desperado.


Comey's lawyer is the guy he leaked the memos to, back when this all started. Seriously.



posted on Jan, 24 2018 @ 01:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
The FEC has these same numbers on their website.

This is probably where the article got the numbers.

(Always Trust the Gov websites)


FEC Boies -- Hillary Victory Fund $416,100

search "Hillary Victory Fund"

Boies

2015-2016



Thank you for providing that. I stand corrected regarding that piece of the discussion.

Their search function was not forthcoming of that info under his individual name, and I had to run it different ways to get as much as I did. I appreciate you taking the trouble.

Carry on...



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 11:33 AM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

They are emphasizing obstruction of justice because that is an impeachable offence. Collusion is vague,and not necessarily a crime unless it can be shown to be a conspiracy directed towards the government.



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 11:35 AM
link   


They are emphasizing obstruction of justice because that is an impeachable offence.

Source for that?
I understood impeachment to be a political process not a criminal one.



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 11:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody



They are emphasizing obstruction of justice because that is an impeachable offence.

Source for that?
I understood impeachment to be a political process not a criminal one.

Impeachment is on the grounds of "high crimes and misdemeanors." Obstruction of justice is one of those crimes. It is why Nixon resigned to prevent the country from sinking into a partisan morass. Trump will never do that.



posted on Jan, 25 2018 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Impeachment is whatever congress decides it to be.
It is a political process not a criminal one.

You dont even understand how this process works do you?



posted on Jan, 28 2018 @ 11:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DJW001

Impeachment is whatever congress decides it to be.
It is a political process not a criminal one.

You dont even understand how this process works do you?

I just cited the Constitution. It is not a legal process because it is not the Judicial Branch doing it. Nevertheless, obstruction of justice is a well defined crime.
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...
A president needs to be removed from office before he or she can be tried in a court of law... at least that has been the assumption up until now. Trump is certainly setting new precedents every day.




top topics



 
34
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join