It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

EXCLUSIVE: Peter Strzok’s Lawyer Donated $416,000 to Hillary Clinton in 2016

page: 2
34
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats on the house intelligence committee are saying that all of this is just a distraction from Mueller closing in on Trump.


And for the first time in your life you are right.

Tick Tock Tick Tock




It's true. No matter what they think Hillary did. Muller is not going anywhere. He will get Trump.






posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

It's not just dems..how about the guys that voted for the surveillance bill yet sat on the fisa memo?

If Mueller is worth a damn he takes them all out.
edit on 23-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Christosterone
“Democrats on House Intellignece Committee”

Now that’s comedy

-Chris


Almost as funny as the guys screaming about the fisa memo who voted to expand surveillance...

www.zdnet.com...

edit on 23-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Did you know that Comey recently lawyered up?

Word has it his immunity deal was yanked due to
his falling out with Mueller over lies.

Hmmm

Dems are only getting desperate desperado.



Im going to guess you got that from an anonymous source on a right wing
BLog



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Christosterone
“Democrats on House Intellignece Committee”

Now that’s comedy

-Chris


Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have just been impeached.

Now that's JUSTICE!



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: neo96

originally posted by: Christosterone
“Democrats on House Intellignece Committee”

Now that’s comedy

-Chris


Democrats on the House Intelligence Committee have just been impeached.

Now that's JUSTICE!
7


A total of 256 members of the House of Representatives voted this morning to expand the government's surveillance powers, ignoring widespread support for reform.



the vote shows that breaks down to 191 Republicans and 65 Democrats.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: kurthall


It's true. No matter what they think Hillary did. Muller is not going anywhere. He will get Trump.



It's Mueller.

And there was Zero chance to start with!



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

No, from his Lawyer Daniel Richman.

Look it up



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:32 PM
link   
A lawyer donated a bunch of money to Hillary, so what's the problem? It's not like he's a Russian official or something.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: six67seven

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: elementalgrove

originally posted by: dukeofjive696969

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats on the house intelligence committee are saying that all of this is just a distraction from Mueller closing in on Trump.


And for the first time in your life you are right.

Tick Tock Tick Tock


You are going to have a ruff time as this all unfolds!!

Tick Tock +++ These people are sick!



Not one of the ops threads has ever been proven to be true, i doubt this will be the one.


The donation and subject of this thread is public record...nothing needs to be proven true simply because it is true.

Willfully ignorant much?

You're not off to the best start, so pretty much true to form for yourself. Your reputation precedes you.


Lol, your on a roll son, still trying to conect dots, where nothing exist.

Oh amd thanks for reputation part lol, so your one of those who thinks that people care what he says.

edit on 23-1-2018 by dukeofjive696969 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

No, from his Lawyer Daniel Richman.

Look it up



Why, unless its illegal for a lawyer to make donations you guys have nothing as usual.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:42 PM
link   
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

How about people don't usually care nor ask who their lawyers donate to?

Usually you find the best available to you. You aren't going on date with these folks.
edit on 23-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Hoe about people don't usually care nor ask who their lawyers donate to?

Usually you find the best available to you. You aren't going on date with these folks.


Sounds about right.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
Democrats on the house intelligence committee are saying that all of this is just a distraction from Mueller closing in on Trump.

It is.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:47 PM
link   
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Comey is deep trouble for leaking classified memos.

There are letters from Congress seeking the details.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

You struck a nerve with this one!



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: dukeofjive696969

Now I believe lynch probably was doing bad things however nobody has an answer to why these idiots voted to expand the surveillance program and sit on the fisa memo until after the vote.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
I think a lot of people assume only one side could be guilty.

Which is hilarious when you stand back and be realistic.

Lynch is a dirty bird but that doesn't mean the trump campaign wasn't didn't have dirty birds.

People are so ready to play their side is the right one.

Look at the Nunes memo he sat on while they voted to expand the program. Several people barking about the memo voted to EXPAND surveillance.

This story was on who gives a crap.Com earlier.

First off his lawyer? You hire lawyers. I have no idea who my lawyers donate to.

You are correct in that the Left thinks this is about Left/Right. This is about Draining the Swamp! ALL of the swamp! The true patriots want them ALL gone. Until people start looking past the R & D you won't see it coming.
edit on 1/23/2018 by Martin75 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:54 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships


Word has it his immunity deal was yanked due to
his falling out with Mueller over lies.


What immunity deal? He was never under suspicion of wrongdoing by anyone but President Snowflake.



posted on Jan, 23 2018 @ 06:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Martin75

SURE. but only swamp people would vote to expand the fisa and surveillance programs.

Yet. The same claiming to be the saviors of transparency are the same who voted for it..

Gowdy. On the list. Go ahead and look the list over then tell me you trust those same people to be crying on breitbart the public needs to know how bad the government is out of control.

It's a joke.

There are no pool cleaners. They just pretend and then have cigars together at the uniparty lottery party.
edit on 23-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
34
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join