It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

page: 81
180
<< 78  79  80    82  83  84 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:38 PM
link   

ATTENTION!!!!!!




15c.) Intellectual Property: You will not Post any copyrighted material owned by others, material belonging to another person, material previously Posted by you on another website, or link to any copyrighted material without providing proper attribution*, as defined by TAN, to its original source. You will not Post any material that infringes, misappropriates, or violates any patent, trademark, trade secret, or other proprietary rights of TAN or any third party. You will not use your Postings on the Websites to promote your own personal website or any other website with which you may be associated without first receiving permission from TAN.

* Proper Attribution for the posting of copyrighted material owned by others is defined as posting a relevant snippet of the online content not to exceed 10% of the entire piece, a properly formed link back to the source website, and a clear indication of the name of the source website. The posting to these websites of any copyrighted material owned by others that is not found elsewhere online is prohibited.

15d.) Cross-Posting: You will not cross-post content from other discussion boards (unless you receive advance written permission from TAN or their agents). You will not post-by-proxy the material of banned members or other individuals who are not members, but have written a response to content within a thread on these forums.


Terms and Conditions of Use--Please Review

ETA
Using Content From Other Websites on ATS
Posting work written by others
This includes images from other sites like twitter.

edit on Sat Jan 27 2018 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:41 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

So a couple of guys had stints at one of the oldest banks in the UK, with 57 offices world wide = ties to Rothschild’s...


So will the thousands of present and past employees..pretty tenuous.

Anything more substantial?



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:50 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT


I think Q and his/her messages must be achieving critical mass awareness, within online communities. In both a positive and a negative way. That's to be expected..and was probably planned to happen.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

So a couple of guys had stints at one of the oldest banks in the UK, with 57 offices world wide = ties to Rothschild’s...


So will the thousands of present and past employees..pretty tenuous.

Anything more substantial?



The people Q has pointed us to all have ties to each other. Its the craziest thing. They are wives, friends, sisters, spouses of each other. Read the 2 Q threads and be amazed. Or cherry pick one post as if it had no relation to anything else.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

Who said anyone was hard on him?


Prince Alwaleed had been confined at the Ritz-Carlton since early November, along with dozens of other senior officials and businessmen


www.reuters.com... T

Seems to be pretty common knowledge that he wasn’t ever “locked up”..

Perhaps better fact checking before making all these implications is in order?



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: IAMTAT


I think Q and his/her messages must be achieving critical mass awareness, within online communities. In both a positive and a negative way. That's to be expected..and was probably planned to happen.


Yes but this only strengthens my resolve. I just ignore all the BS from now on and i urge all of you to do the same. This is too important.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus

Seems to be pretty common knowledge that he wasn’t ever “locked up”..


He was locked up and interrogated in the Hotel for several months.

To imply differently is mis- or disinformation...which is it?
edit on 2018 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating


Slight backtrack: Last week, when Q stated that Obama had retained 9 Attorneys/WW. I think Q's "WW" meant World Wide, just like in the post today regarding Snowden and the National Security hold. (I remember a discussion of what "WW" could have meant.)

Carry on...
edit on 1/27/2018 by carewemust because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

Well using this logic, I’ve got ties to Putin.

I did work for a man who used to manage a hotel in Poland that Putin stayed at during a G20 (or similar)conference.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus


Source in Saudi Arabia says American private security contractors are carrying out'interrogations' on princes and billionaires arrested in crackdown Detained members of Saudi elite have been hung by their feet and beaten by interrogates, source saysAmong those hung upside down are Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, an investor worth at least $7 billion who is being held at Riyadh's Ritz CarltonArrests were ordered three weeks ago by Crown Prince Mohammed bin SalmanSource claims mercenaries are from 'Blackwater', a claim also made by Lebanese president

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk...



It was carried by many media outlets worldwide, but few stateside. YMMV
edit on 27-1-2018 by RadioRobert because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:58 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust



Obama had retained 9 Attorneys


And what logical reason is there for doing that?



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 10:58 PM
link   




posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 11:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

Isn’t that what you’re doing?

Sarcastically showing that he looks fine.

Of course he looks fine, he’s been holed up in a Ritz!

Who said he wasn’t doing fine?



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 11:00 PM
link   
nvm.
edit on 2018 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 11:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

Isn’t that what you’re doing?

Sarcastically showing that he looks fine.

Of course he looks fine, he’s been holed up in a Ritz!

Who said he wasn’t doing fine?


No, you misunderstood. I dont see him as looking fine. He looks skinny and dishevelled.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 11:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Perfectenemy

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: IAMTAT


I think Q and his/her messages must be achieving critical mass awareness, within online communities. In both a positive and a negative way. That's to be expected..and was probably planned to happen.


Yes but this only strengthens my resolve. I just ignore all the BS from now on and i urge all of you to do the same. This is too important.


Exactly right! That's why I posted earlier how dismayed I am that ATS members get offended and respond with long rebuttals to agitators.

The first/original "Q" thread would not have reached its maximum page length..not yet, if the cynics, haters, disrupters, and agitators were totally 100% flat-out IGNORED. I hope that EGO can be put on the back-burner with THIS thread.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 11:06 PM
link   
a reply to: Skyfloating

Where did I say he was free to go anywhere he wants?

I sad “locked up” in quotes. As in not in jail.



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 11:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnkhMorpork




Perhaps you could show how Trump tweeted that 8 hours before Q did!!!!

Of course that would not fit the blatant deceit you seem to display.

And I'm still waiting for you to provide proof of your two most recent "Fake Assertions ."


MTUBY



posted on Jan, 27 2018 @ 11:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: Skyfloating

Well using this logic, I’ve got ties to Putin.

I did work for a man who used to manage a hotel in Poland that Putin stayed at during a G20 (or similar)conference.



Do you take money from Putin? Visit with him? No? Then you dont have ties to Putin.



new topics

top topics



 
180
<< 78  79  80    82  83  84 >>

log in

join