-@TH3WH17ERABB17-Q- Questions. White House Insider's posting twitter account- PART 2

originally posted by: TomLawless

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Q drop

VJ phone call w/ AS.
42m 13s. [2 listeners - no IDEN]. [1

]_reroutes_[9 random]
[1
]_reroutes_[2 random]
Article 3. Section 3.
Q

Section 3 - Treason. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of TWO Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Treason is thrown out often but in the US it is a very detailed, specific thing. Assuming Q knows his Constitutional Law, Schiff is screwed. TWO WITNESSES mr schiff? Recorded phone call? How careless.

Valerie Jarrett and Adam Schiff. I bet that was an interesting 42 minutes.

I remember Q, not too long ago, saying there will be audio coming.

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: TomLawless

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: TomLawless

If I'm making an educated guess...Q is telling someone:

"SENT 'W' To ATS 2 PROJECT F -Q"

Whoah.

Taking it with a grain of salt obviously, but....

Yowza.

That's got to be coincidence. It's GOT to be.

I say this a lot. Coincidence does not exist.

But this has GOT to be.

No way little old ATS and our silly little thread gets that kind of attention.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: TomLawless

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Q drop

VJ phone call w/ AS.
42m 13s. [2 listeners - no IDEN]. [1

]_reroutes_[9 random]
[1
]_reroutes_[2 random]
Article 3. Section 3.
Q

Section 3 - Treason. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of TWO Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Treason is thrown out often but in the US it is a very detailed, specific thing. Assuming Q knows his Constitutional Law, Schiff is screwed. TWO WITNESSES mr schiff? Recorded phone call? How careless.

Valerie Jarrett and Adam Schiff. I bet that was an interesting 42 minutes.

I remember Q, not too long ago, saying there will be audio coming.

That would be the most beautiful thing ever.

Ok.
I get it now.
I didn't see the NYT article.... here is a link to it.
The NYT article tries to smear Page, but if you read the article and then read the court documents, you will see that it is obvious that Page was the undercover informant, UCE-1 listed in the court documents.

a reply to: Skyfloating


Don't comment on mod actions. Then we're fine if we don't say any bad words or treat anyone unkindly or with incivility and you and the reader are free to ignore or pay attention as they wish. Everyone is free to freely express themselves. It's easy to prevent this thread from being shut down and trashed or something, which would be an absurd outcome when the rules are very straightforward, and easy to follow. I'm saying this as much for me as for anyone and for the sake of the thread's continuity in time and history as things unfold.

This adventure reminds me a lot of "Find The Rings", a scavenger hunt kind of game ATS hosted long ago and the reason I joined. On more than one occasion since then I've felt like that game was a kind of 'basic training' for the kind of work now done routinely in threads like this one.
Love it!

Oh, and to add some on-topic, I so want to see VJ get what's coming to them...almost as much as EH.

originally posted by: crankyoldman
Q drop

VJ phone call w/ AS.
42m 13s. [2 listeners - no IDEN]. [1

]_reroutes_[9 random]
[1
]_reroutes_[2 random]
Article 3. Section 3.
Q

Section 3 - Treason. Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of TWO Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

Treason is thrown out often but in the US it is a very detailed, specific thing. Assuming Q knows his Constitutional Law, Schiff is screwed. TWO WITNESSES mr schiff? Recorded phone call? How careless.

Those two witnesses could have been members of our Intelligence Community who set up the wiretap/recording of VJ/AS.

originally posted by: TomLawless

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: TomLawless

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: TomLawless

If I'm making an educated guess...Q is telling someone:

"SENT 'W' To ATS 2 PROJECT F -Q"

Whoah.

Taking it with a grain of salt obviously, but....

Yowza.

That's got to be coincidence. It's GOT to be.

I say this a lot. Coincidence does not exist.

But this has GOT to be.

No way little old ATS and our silly little thread gets that kind of attention.

After following the Q for months, these drops are very well crafted, super crafted. Nothing is random.

TAT has an eye, as well as a connection. When "mapped out" it is clear it was intentional.

So while it seems silly at first, GA has pointed out that this thread is very "hot". So what is meant is: information, connection(s), energy, support and most of all dedication. Now, we have seen this attention is drawing other unwanted attention our way. This attention is a "test" which we can pass with ease by simply driving on and doing the work. Nice to get a shout out for good work.

Tip of the hat to everyone here, well done.

originally posted by: butcherguy
Ok.
I get it now.
I didn't see the NYT article.... here is a link to it.
The NYT article tries to smear Page, but if you read the article and then read the court documents, you will see that it is obvious that Page was the undercover informant, UCE-1 listed in the court documents.

These people are stupid!

nvm

Re: qcodefag.github.io...

What is Q pointing out in posts #667, #668 and #669?

originally posted by: crankyoldman

originally posted by: TomLawless

originally posted by: tigertatzen

originally posted by: TomLawless

originally posted by: IAMTAT
a reply to: TomLawless

If I'm making an educated guess...Q is telling someone:

"SENT 'W' To ATS 2 PROJECT F -Q"

Whoah.

Taking it with a grain of salt obviously, but....

Yowza.

That's got to be coincidence. It's GOT to be.

I say this a lot. Coincidence does not exist.

But this has GOT to be.

No way little old ATS and our silly little thread gets that kind of attention.

After following the Q for months, these drops are very well crafted, super crafted. Nothing is random.

TAT has an eye, as well as a connection. When "mapped out" it is clear it was intentional.

So while it seems silly at first, GA has pointed out that this thread is very "hot". So what is meant is: information, connection(s), energy, support and most of all dedication. Now, we have seen this attention is drawing other unwanted attention our way. This attention is a "test" which we can pass with ease by simply driving on and doing the work. Nice to get a shout out for good work.

Tip of the hat to everyone here, well done.

You've done a lot to set the tone, Patriot.

nvm

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Someone just inserted this in my last post:

This post was part of a special Halloween Homage to Orson Wells. Jumping out from behind the server and shouting BOO!

"Boo!", indeed.

Yeah, WTH was that!?

originally posted by: carewemust
Re: qcodefag.github.io...

What is Q pointing out in posts #667, #668 and #669?

Apparently, Q has access to security cameras in the chamber. I can't read the words on that middle cellphone image. Q says to "enhance" that image and make it viral.

originally posted by: tjack

originally posted by: IAMTAT
Someone just inserted this in my last post:

This post was part of a special Halloween Homage to Orson Wells. Jumping out from behind the server and shouting BOO!

"Boo!", indeed.

Yeah, WTH was that!?

I didn't put it there.

a reply to: IAMTAT

That wasn't you?

a reply to: TomLawless

If you only knew

originally posted by: carewemust
Re: qcodefag.github.io...

What is Q pointing out in posts #667, #668 and #669?

since you guys keep filling up this thread with "playfulness", I'll post this question in the general forum. Thought this one was specifically for "Q" discussions. Guess I was wrong...

Find 1 of 4.
“Trump should be shot!”
You are now working against those monitoring.
Raw only.
No edits.
Save offline.
Q

qcodefag.github.io...

Is he referring to this image of someone texting at the SOTU?

qcodefag.github.io...

Edit/Update: Q is suggesting that in one of another four messages or frames of the video, that upon magnification, that's what we'll find [“Trump should be shot!”] and then to make it go viral. He wants us to find it - that's the way I've interpreted his clue


Q should post a pic of the face of Chuck Schumer @ SOTU and offer some explanation for that devilish grin..

If we can predict a post from Q of some particular content like that, when we could have confirmation that he's found us over here on ATS. Wouldn't THAT be something?! That would complete the test, for the readership and MAGA supporters. Then everyone would know and everyone would know that they know they know, if you know what i mean?