It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
The New York Post has an OP ED on the scandal. Not much new in here, but it's good to see they aren't on press blackout which they do note.
Something similar is happening now at the FBI, with the Washington wagons circling the agency to protect it from charges of corruption. This time, the appropriate tag line is “too big to believe.”
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Perfectenemy
Was the meeting of secret society members after Hillary lost to:
1) Activate a plan to "stop" President-elect or President Trump?
2) Activate a plan to erase/cover-up their efforts at sabotaging his candidacy?
3) Both or Neither.
I'm glad we're talking about recent history. The traitors are still alive and interrogatable. But I doubt that they'll be sitting idle, waiting for the subpoenas. There might be a Secret Society meeting/retreat occuring right now.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: Grambler
Well i guess we now know why the FBI didn't take a look at the DNC server because they already knew what they would find. They were in on it all along and all the outrage was fake. Floodgate is gonna sink a lot of careers.
originally posted by: Wayfarer
a reply to: Grambler
Is your implied solution to let Trump put together a crack team of new FBI agents to investigate him and all other related issues?
originally posted by: Grambler
It now seems obvious that there were people thaat were etremely biased against Trump in the FBI.
It also now seems obvious that the FBI (as it has done historically) is not above losing or altering evidence to push their agenda.
Given the recent developments, are we still suppose to just take the FBI word with no proof that the wikileaks files from the DNC was a russian hack?
Keep in mind, the FBI was just taking crowdstrikes word for it, and was never allowed to see the server from themselves.
Yet the media and dnc beat us over the head for months saying to even question why the fbi didnt look at the server was disgusting. Remember, 17 intel agencies said it was russia (of course that was a lie that later became four of five agencies).
Now we are to believe that these fbi people, who felt no need to look at the most important piece of physical evidence in the server, and who we now know were texting about hating trump and insurance policies and secret societies, despite the fact they have shown no evidence of russia hacking the server?
What a joke.
originally posted by: dashen
maybe they are using this intel to whip up the plebs into a frothy frenzy before they dump the coup-de-grace.
cant wake people out of their flouride-coma too suddenly