It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Jusvistn
originally posted by: loveguy
a reply to: IAMTAT
US Bank Stadium is the site of the next Super Bowl, scheduled for February 4, 2018.
Inside info if it exists would cause the stock of usb to tumble pre-game? Stocks being sold beforehand in mass would be indicative?
Seems stock would soar because of the game?
I'm not a normal stock ticker watcher so I don't know why the idea formed in my head.
Saw this post, then back on RECENT
Saw this right after - Bumpy Ride Ahead? US Stocks Finally Down
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: diggindirt
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: diggindirt
Unity, prosperity, and transparency, all go hand-in-hand.
You betcha! Emphasis on the unity bringing prosperity while revealing exactly what has impeded our prosperity in the immediate past.
Democrats and Republicans should join hands and sing Kumbaya.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: loveguy
a reply to: IAMTAT
US Bank Stadium is the site of the next Super Bowl, scheduled for February 4, 2018.
Inside info if it exists would cause the stock of usb to tumble pre-game? Stocks being sold beforehand in mass would be indicative?
Seems stock would soar because of the game?
I'm not a normal stock ticker watcher so I don't know why the idea formed in my head.
Didn't something similar take place with MGM Resorts Intl. stock before Vegas?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: Jusvistn
originally posted by: loveguy
a reply to: IAMTAT
US Bank Stadium is the site of the next Super Bowl, scheduled for February 4, 2018.
Inside info if it exists would cause the stock of usb to tumble pre-game? Stocks being sold beforehand in mass would be indicative?
Seems stock would soar because of the game?
I'm not a normal stock ticker watcher so I don't know why the idea formed in my head.
Saw this post, then back on RECENT
Saw this right after - Bumpy Ride Ahead? US Stocks Finally Down
It's disgusting how stupid the liberal media is. They think a 400 point drop in a 26,000 point market is the same percentage loss as a 400 point drop in Obama's 13,000 point DJIA.
ABC News' Brian Ross caused a big one day loss and the idiots in the MSM never reported it.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
a reply to: ketsuko
If enough people in enough high places take a tumble, then it would introduce instability into the system which would cause stocks to drop. The market does not like uncertainty.
Yes & No.
In general, the market doesn't like uncertainty. But the reason for that is because uncertainty limits the odds of winning your bets. But there are still winners, regardless.
Remember what the market looked like at 2AM EST on November 9th of 2016? Every shark in the country that has their hand in the stock market started placing their bets on companies that would be inherent to American infrastructure. The market soared as a result.
It's difficult to say how the market would react to a series of high level indictments. However, I'd be willing to wager that whatever the result, in the long run it will be healthier for the American economy.
originally posted by: Skyfloating
John Solomon (referenced by Q months ago), has not been heard of since January 11.
originally posted by: Skyfloating
Both Wray and CNN finally ADMIT that Memo contents played a role in McCabes departure.
Previously: "The Memo is full of Lies. Its treasonous. Its classified"
Now: "Well...we fired one of our own because of whats in the Memo. So maybe its not ALL lies. "
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: tigertatzen
It's not that hard to think.
Strategically, it's my weakness. When playing strategy games, I can form complex plots that would take turns to orchestrate, but if something really unexpected happens, I can completely melt down and do the stupidest things over it.
I could understand that if we weren't talking about a vast network of global elites. But we are. Kind of detracts from the fear factor when you see such power and privilege choke over some unexpected chess moves...you'd think all that money and power could have at least bought them some lackeys with a tad more common sense.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
I'm back on page 117 and so I'm not sure if it's been brought up yet, but I'm seeing mentions of G4S being brought in for Superbowl security.
This is a huge red flag.
See Matafuchs' excellent thread, "Link between Orlando Terror Shooting, San Bernadino and Washington Naval Yard...and more? ," for details.
Back to catching up, been busy at work today and so have not been on at all since last night.
originally posted by: texasgirl
You think Q is aware of this?
Former Secret Service Agent: FISA Memo will Implicate Obama!
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: diggindirt
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: diggindirt
Unity, prosperity, and transparency, all go hand-in-hand.
You betcha! Emphasis on the unity bringing prosperity while revealing exactly what has impeded our prosperity in the immediate past.
Democrats and Republicans should join hands and sing Kumbaya.