It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An audit discovered Monterrey used “ambiguous job titles as justification to ignore state requirements” and that they “employ people with disqualifying criminal histories” and many employees “have either not passed or been submitted for a background check.” [1]
Sudden changes of security a few months before a big event are not a good sign. [2] And here are a few reasons we are concerned with G4S taking over this most important of sporting events with attendance expected to peak at stadium capacity.
There is also a common link between the Orlando shooting, San Bernardino, and Washington Naval Yard incident: #G4S. Guess who worked for G4S Secure Solutions, one of the world’s largest security firms and a government contractor for the Department of Homeland Security?
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
Who are the mysterious 4 contractors? This ties in with the April 2017 report. Apparently some contractors had unfetted access to classified intel for a while that led to the immediate termination of said government contracts and the NSA wasn't happy about it.
The Apache HTTP Server, colloquially called Apache (/əˈpætʃiː/ ə-PA-chee), is free and open-source cross-platform web server software, released under the terms of Apache License 2.0. Apache is developed and maintained by an open community of developers under the auspices of the Apache Software Foundation.
The Apache HTTP Server is cross-platform; as of 1 June 2017 92% of Apache HTTPS Server copies run on Linux distributions.[5] Version 2.0 improved support for non-Unix operating systems such as Windows and OS/2.[6] Old versions of Apache were ported to run on OpenVMS[7] and NetWare.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
G4S is suspicious as hell. Not good. What do you know about G4S, the Superbowl security company? False Flag potential very high.
An audit discovered Monterrey used “ambiguous job titles as justification to ignore state requirements” and that they “employ people with disqualifying criminal histories” and many employees “have either not passed or been submitted for a background check.” [1]
Sudden changes of security a few months before a big event are not a good sign. [2] And here are a few reasons we are concerned with G4S taking over this most important of sporting events with attendance expected to peak at stadium capacity.
There is also a common link between the Orlando shooting, San Bernardino, and Washington Naval Yard incident: #G4S. Guess who worked for G4S Secure Solutions, one of the world’s largest security firms and a government contractor for the Department of Homeland Security?
FBI Federal Bureau of Investigation Logo 25mm (1 inch) Button Pin Badge
by A. paches
REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators +
[2] former O-senior officials +
[4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO
C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].
TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION -
HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE?
WE SEE YOU.
Q
So, 01/29 late night #Qanon drop says they busted 14 people in a secure-room midnight meeting last night who did not have clearance - 7 cong reps, 3 senators, 2 BHO highups, 4 contractors. #SecretSociety much?
Q's thoughts & observations, apparent coded references & so on, all started out quite lucid; but eventually, they've seemed to develop to the point at which it's just oddments of wildly varying phrases & words strung randomly together, lots of capital letters & exclamation marks, etc.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: IAMTAT
That was actually a pretty stupid move on their part because we now have confirmation that the majority memo is the real deal. Why would they risk this exposure to view a memo that is apparently full of lies? Maybe they went to look at something unrelated to the memo and check if it is still "secure". Hmm.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
Q is not just communicating with us. I chalked it up to hidden code that is only important to the people in the know.
originally posted by: texasgirl
originally posted by: ketsuko
Full of Schiff. No one in the House has even had any chance to see the Schiff counter memo to even verify what is in it, let alone that it exists. So voting "no" on releasing it was apparently an easy thing. There has been no committee or House review like there has been with the infamous four-page memo.
Paul Ryan is holding a press conference and explaining why they didn't release the counter-memo the Dems put out. He's holding stong but sounds exasperated with all the questions being thrown at him!