In the following video Joe diGenova, former U.S. Attorney for Washington, DC, and Victoria, and was a deputy asst. Attorney General under President
Reagan, explains how there has been, and still exist an obvious blatant, but ludicrous plot to exonerate Hillary Clinton of her criminal acts in how
she handled classified information. But at the same time members of the Obama administration, including DOJ officials, FBI officials and possibly CIA
agents all colluded together with private contractors, like Fusion GPS in this plot. These private contractors paid reporters from left-wing
mainstream media to publish false stories with no evidence trying to frame President Trump during, and after his campaign when he became President of
The video is a must watch.
I also wanted to point out something another member tried to claim.
We all know that the FBI had asked the DNC for access to their servers to find evidence of the "alleged Russian hack", but the DNC denied the FBI
access. In the other thread ATS member Scrubdog claims that: "There had been tremendous hatred between the Hillary campaign and the NYC FBI for a
long time, it's not a surprise that the DNC wouldn't turn their servers over in the middle of a dam campaign, given their distrust of the Giuliani
portion of the FBI. It just isn't. "
A criminal investigation of an "alleged foreign government hacking a United States political party" has to be investigated by the FBI, whether or not
there is an "alleged beef between the DNC and the NYC FBI branch..." It has to be investigated by the FBI, not by a for profit private company which
has a history of making fake reports... You can't change that fact. As for Manafort history with having PAST business relations with
Russians...that was years before he worked for the Trump campaign... It's stupid to claim that because Manafort had dealings with the Russians
years past, that this is proof that Trump and his team colluded with Russia. That's just ludicrous BS and we all know it...
The two indicments of Manafort and Flynn were made not because there was any collusion, but simply because Manafort and Flynn didn't report what is
perfectly legal to do...
The Obama administration themselves received in, i think it was October 2016 the same Russian ambassador, and several Senators, including democrats,
had talked to the Russian ambassador...
ATS member Scrubdog also claimed, "but the statements of Comey and Jeh Johnson was months ago"... So what? Still nothing has been provided as
evidence to corroborate any collusion between the Trump campaign, and the Russian government...
But you know what will really come out? You are in for the ride of your life. This is much bigger than Watergate, and like Watergate goes all the
way to the previous President.
Several DOJ officials from the Obama administration, the FBI, and at least the CIA were involved in pushing a false narrative, and fake reports trying
to destroy a sitting U.S. President with made up claims that have not one iota of truth. Those same fake reports were used to obtain the FISA
warrants to spy on a Presidential candidate and his team.
The FISA courts already know that they were given false claims as evidence to spy on a Presidential candidate. Several reporters were paid by
contractors that worked for the DNC, such as Fusion GPS, and they paid reporters to publish fake story after fake story about President Trump during,
and after his campaign.
There is already a FISA report that has been redacted of the names of U.S. officials within the DOJ, the FBI, and possibly the CIA who were in on this
ludicrous political attack on President Trump and it states that these agencies were involved in illegal and criminal acts to destroy Trump during and
after he became U.S. President.
edit on 22-1-2018 by ElectricUniverse because: add and correct comment.
edit on 22-1-2018 by ElectricUniverse because: add
link and comment.
This will no doubt send some people in to denial, others fits of ecstasy. He lays out the complete tale of the "Russian collusion" idea and how Comey
and the FISA court were the tools to try to stop Trump from while letting Hillary off the hook for her mishandling of classified information. Great
video, the fallout will be epic.
edit on 22-1-2018 by Asktheanimals because: (no reason given)
Trust me, they won't touch this with a 10 foot pole. Although the redacted FISA report is not showing the names of those people within the different
branches of government who committed these crimes, it still says crimes were committed. But instead of asking for the redacted copy of the memo the
FBI, and the left demand for Nuñez to release the unredacted copy "and for the public to make the decision themselves".
Except that this is asking for Nuñez to commit some of the same crimes that people within the FBI committed when they released classified information
to the press which included the names of Americans in an ongoing investigation who should have had their names hidden...
The FBI and the left are doing two things by asking this. First, they are planting doubt on the minds of Americans who don't understand what is being
asked of Nuñez, and second, if Nuñez were to be so careless and release the unredacted memo then they can bury the memo and Nuñez because he would
be breaking the law...
edit on 22-1-2018 by ElectricUniverse because: correct comment.
This content community relies on user-generated content from our member contributors. The opinions of our members are not those of site ownership who maintains strict editorial agnosticism and simply provides a collaborative venue for free expression.