It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FISA ‘Info Suggests Documents Catastrophically Bad For Dems’: Adam Schiff Leaks Dry Up

page: 22
116
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Xcathdra

Which ones changed seats they were supposed to win?


So all you are going to do is deflect... ok

and to answer your deflection Wisconsin and that's it.

Ballotpedia - State legislative special elections, 2018




posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:27 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

The hypocrisy is amazing with you.

You are using that excuse because there are no left leaning media outlets covering whats going on. instead of admitting that you just talk in circles.

Democrats were told not to engage this topic.
Democrats didn't bother to read the memo.
Left wing media wont cover it.

yeah....



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Speaking of deflecting which seats changed from Democrat to republican this year so far or the last couple months even?

Looks like you showed a chart that encompasses the Obama blunder years and the beginning of the Trump bump...which ones are most recent.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:30 PM
link   
Deflection meter is pegged at 100%.


Situation normal.

Carry on.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus

You posted a video (up to that point) and im on a conference call.

I didn't refuse to consider it because its russian. What i did was answer your question about had I ever heard of that stuff....with "no, i don't pay attention to Russian entertainment".

Im asking again, for a straight answer: you alleged that a video of the golden shower exists. Does it, or does it not?


Christopher Steele heard from a source that Donald Trump trafficked in hookers while in Russia and former Soviet Republics.

Another Source said that Aras Agalarov and his wannabe pop star son Emin were responsible for setting Trump up for his sexual escapades in Russia and nearby countries.

An example was cited that Trump Paid prostitutes to pee on a bed in the Presidential Suite in Nov 2013 at the Moscow Ritz Carelton, in the Presidential Suite where Pres. Obama and the First Lady had once slept. That Aras had set it up for FSB Kompromat purposes and covert video was taken.

Trump said it was all farce, never happened, he wasn't there.

Then a music video by Emiin Agalarov was unearthed, shot in November 2013, at the Moscow Ritz-Carleton featuring Trump with parts of it filmed in the Presidential Suite at the Moscow Ritz Carelton.

Schiller, trumps body guard at the time, under congressional testimony ended up admitting that he was approached by people offering to set Trump up with Prostitutes while there.

So..Trump lied...Steele had the time, date, place, room, people, prostitutes right.

Tell me where I am wrong?



edit on 19-1-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:32 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

I answered that deflection of yours - Wisconsin.

That is all Democrats won.
Republicans won the other 4.

Please keep up so the thread doesnt get derailed by having to repeat info you failed to read.

Thanks

back on topic.

The pee lie people keep repeating dont seem to understand that Trump is a germaphobe.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

The media on the left and center have covered it. But your a big boy. You can use Google. Surely you have eyes or at least a braille reader.

You post garbage and pretend it's real. You are going nuts over a memo that hasn't been released yet..

Again check the Hill (slightly left) USA today, wsj, national review those last two being right leaning..

They also don't publish speculation like your sources pretending opinions are facts. So the coverage is minimal since there is almost nothing but talking heads to report on..

Here is a bone for you though just because you like to do source wars and not hold a discussion with thoughts.

thehill.com...



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:34 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Were those other 4 democratic seats that have been held by democrats in Democrat counties who voted for Clinton overwhelmingly or are you just playing dumb?



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:34 PM
link   
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hearsay is not admissible in court nor is it enough to reach probable cause to obtain a warrant.

and yet democrats involved in all of this managed to get a FISA warrant after being shot down by the FISA court the first time they tried.

Let that sink it and understand the implications.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hearsay is not admissible in court.


LOL

That's where you are running to?

Corroborated evidence is worth following up.

Be patient and wait for Mueller to tie this up in a bow.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:37 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

So when you said the Hill was slightly liberal, insinuating its conservative most of the time - www.abovetopsecret.com...

As I said you cant provide a link to a left wing media outlet for the simple fact they refuse to cover this.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

and yet democrats involved in all of this managed to get a FISA warrant after being shot down by the FISA court the first time they tried.




That is a collection of BS molded into a pretzel you are eager to eat that would make Glen Beck blush in his most fevered conspiracy moments.

edit on 19-1-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Xcathdra

Were those other 4 democratic seats that have been held by democrats in Democrat counties who voted for Clinton overwhelmingly or are you just playing dumb?


Feel free to point out where I said Democrats and 4 other seats.

Maybe you should think about not trying to derail the thread.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: soberbacchus

Hearsay is not admissible in court nor is it enough to reach probable cause to obtain a warrant.

and yet democrats involved in all of this managed to get a FISA warrant after being shot down by the FISA court the first time they tried.

Let that sink it and understand the implications.


Total speculation and opinion from you. No evidence of this has occurred. You can't get a fisa warrant with the Steele dossier. If they did the entire judicial system is broken.

Oh and the morons are voting to keep the FISA surveillance...including nunes who barely wrote any changes to the process. ..
edit on 19-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Meh there is a mod here he can stop it . You just don't like being called out.

There is a difference when a democrat overturns a Republican in a historically republican county who overwhelmingly voted for Trump correct or are you playing dumb?

You would be a terrible campaign manager if that wasn't concerning to you.
edit on 19-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:44 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

Yeah and yet you fail to understand the issues with the FISA warrants and its involvement in this whole mess.

The dossier was used to get the FISA warrant. As a matter of fact is was used because when the FBI/DOJ tried to get a FISA warrant on Trump the first time it was denied.

Congress's investigations / interviews revealed nothing that could be corroborated in the Dossier. The dossier was misrepresented to meet the required threshold for the warrant.

The dossier was a fraud on the court.
edit on 19-1-2018 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: luthier

So when you said the Hill was slightly liberal, insinuating its conservative most of the time - www.abovetopsecret.com...

As I said you cant provide a link to a left wing media outlet for the simple fact they refuse to cover this.



Oh man why does that matter?

You really have trouble debating without sourcing your argument.

Did the national review cover it? What the wsj?

Only poorly rated far right publications have been running with this being the end without aNY information but some congressman saying it's bad.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

If you want to talk about special elections start a new thread and don't derail this one. It is apparently difficult enough for some people to follow and burying information with off topic crap doesnt help.

Thanks.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: luthier

Yeah and yet you fail to understand the issues with the FISA warrants and its involvement in this whole mess.

The dossier was used to get the FISA warrant. As a matter of fact is was used because when the FBI/DOJ tried to get a FISA warrant on Trump the first time it was denied.

Congress's investigations / interviews revealed nothing could be corroborated in the Dossier. The dossier was misrepresented to meet the required threshold for the warrant.

The dossier was a fraud on the court.


This is 100 percent false and disinformation.

The steele dossier was not used as the sole reason for a fisa warrant. This is absolutely false and has no evidence. If it was used it was cross referenced with other facts, you have no idea how the process actually works.

Secondly you have no proof that the Steele dosier was completely false or which parts were used for the warrant and with what cross reference of information.

But go ahead and throw out some breitbart opinion pieces.
edit on 19-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 03:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier

originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: luthier

Yeah and yet you fail to understand the issues with the FISA warrants and its involvement in this whole mess.

The dossier was used to get the FISA warrant. As a matter of fact is was used because when the FBI/DOJ tried to get a FISA warrant on Trump the first time it was denied.

Congress's investigations / interviews revealed nothing could be corroborated in the Dossier. The dossier was misrepresented to meet the required threshold for the warrant.

The dossier was a fraud on the court.


This is 100 percent false and disinformation.

The steele dossier was not used as the sole reason for a fisa warrant. This is absolutely false and has no evidence. If it was used it was cross referenced with other facts, you have no idea how the process actually works.

Secondly you have no proof that the Steele dosier was completely false or which parts were used for the warrant and with what cross reference of information.

But go ahead and throw out some breitbart opinion pieces.


100% false huh? So you have seen the actual Fisa (Fish????) warrant?



new topics

top topics



 
116
<< 19  20  21    23  24  25 >>

log in

join