FISA ‘Info Suggests Documents Catastrophically Bad For Dems’: Adam Schiff Leaks Dry Up

a reply to: soberbacchus

Are you saying you have video showing Trump receiving his golden shower?

No, i don't pay attention to Russian entertainment. Or Russian in general.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Xcathdra

Do you ever use sources that are even slightly neutral or is it all conformation bias for you?

Don't like having your beliefs challenged do you?

Good point. Do me a favor and provide some links to left leaning media outlets that are currently covering this.

Thanks.

originally posted by: RickinVa

originally posted by: CynConcepts
a reply to: luthier

If Nunez created this false memo in a vacuum, then why isn't the Intel Dems who voted not to share this with the House...not screaming from their podiums and/or tweeting that the memo is false, bogus, lies?

Especially since for everyone else who reads it is disturbed at what is in it. Why are the Dems being sooooo quiet? Why are they not alleviating everyone's concerns by sharing that this memo is ALL Nunez lies?

That is exactly what I was thinking..... if it was a faulty assessment, the democrats should be screaming bloody murder.

But not a peep so far.

Have you read Adam Schiff and the Democrats words?

They have.

Try reading sources that give you both sides. Maybe USA today, even the hill which is slightly liberal gives both sides.

The Republicans just lost a special election that they shouldn't have. There is a Rollercoaster of bad press by the liberal media. This very well could be an attempt to level it out.

It would be a terrible move if that is the case. It could hurt a real investigation into lynch and Obama.

But I am jaded and cynical when it comes to words out of politicians hands or mouths.

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: luthier

This is correct. The President can order the memo to be declassified, if it is a classified document.

Congress cannot.

Actually they can. The intel committee in the House can make a motion in their committee to release the memo. All that is required for approval is a simple majority vote. The Executive branch is then notified of the intent to release. The executive branch has something like 60-90 days to review the info and object to whatever they are not liking.

After that it gets released.

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: soberbacchus
a reply to: Grambler

Fix your quoting if you have any clue how.

inventing quotes by posters is a severe T&C violation.

Hahahahahaha!

This post further proves your desperation!

Now please, regale us with more pee fairy tales!

???
OF COURSE Trump hired hookers. He pays porn stars off, has what? 13 plus outstanding sexual assault and harassment lawsuits?

I just got off the phone with Chuck Schumer, and he gave me a message to pass on to you.

He said "PLEASE stop trying to help!"

a reply to: Xcathdra

Your sources aren't right leaning. They are full biased.

Right leaning would be the national review or wsj.

mediabiasfactcheck.com...

Everyone has the smoking gun, the document, the evidence, the inside sources that have the truth, the key piece that will take down the entire system... also, everyone has excuses

a reply to: luthier

and if you checked other media outlets that are not left leaning you would also know that their were 5 special elections and Democrats only won the one you mentioned.

a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

The Steele Report, Revisited
How much of the infamous document ended up being corroborated elsewhere? A WHOLE LOT
www.slate.com...

US investigators corroborate some aspects of the Russia dossier
www.cnn.com...

U.S. Officials Verify Key “Trump Dossier” Claims with Help from U.K. & Dutch Intelligence Agencies
globalsecurityreview.com...

It's gone quite since Mueller took over, but just be patient.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: luthier

This is correct. The President can order the memo to be declassified, if it is a classified document.

Congress cannot.

Actually they can. The intel committee in the House can make a motion in their committee to release the memo. All that is required for approval is a simple majority vote. The Executive branch is then notified of the intent to release. The executive branch has something like 60-90 days to review the info and object to whatever they are not liking.

After that it gets released.

A classified memo?

That's news to me. Only one I knew who has ability to declassify is Executive branch.

e: It appears there are rules to notify the President with 5 days to object... these are old rules, and may have changed since. The House or Senate Intelligence Committee has the say on declassifying. Interesting. I stand corrected.

I guess it's a check on executive branch, since executive branch does the classifying.

It seems the difference between the rules are that the Senate requires a vote from the full chamber, but House rules does not - whatever the Intelligence Committee says goes.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Which ones changed seats they were supposed to win?

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Xcathdra

Your sources aren't right leaning. They are full biased.

Right leaning would be the national review or wsj.

mediabiasfactcheck.com...

So then that would be a no, you cant provide sources from media you trust that are covering this?

check.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus

Are you saying you have video showing Trump receiving his golden shower?

Of course not.

I am saying Putin does. It's as sure as ..ahem..rain.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus

No, i don't pay attention to Russian entertainment. Or Russian in general.

You don't pay attention to anything that threatens your worldview.

a reply to: soberbacchus

So you don't have a video of the ridiculous golden shower?

Side note: there are sources that refute what you just linked. So which one is to be believed?

I find it funny that the left's primary defense against this memo appears to be to try to resurrect the peeing hookers rumor, which anybody with half a brain (including most Democrats) dismissed as absurd about 5 minutes after they first read it.

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus

No, i don't pay attention to Russian entertainment. Or Russian in general.

You don't pay attention to anything that threatens your worldview.

If you are going to just lob random insults, you can get bent. I talk to you politely, and expect the same in return

a reply to: Xcathdra

Correct I don't just believe anything I read. However I do check several, like the wsj, national review, the hill, USA today, etc..

So playing link wars with you isn't something I am interested in. I don't have a source I blindly follow. Check those sites reporting on your own time.

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: soberbacchus

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: soberbacchus

No, i don't pay attention to Russian entertainment. Or Russian in general.

You don't pay attention to anything that threatens your worldview.

If you are going to just lob random insults, you can get bent.

I talk to you politely, and expect the same in return

I provided evidence that you refused to consider because it was "Russian".

Get bent?...is that 80's or 90's...I can't remember.

a reply to: soberbacchus

You posted a video (up to that point) and im on a conference call.

I didn't refuse to consider it because its russian. What i did was answer your question about had I ever heard of that stuff....with "no, i don't pay attention to Russian entertainment".

Im asking again, for a straight answer: you alleged that a video of the golden shower exists. Does it, or does it not?