FISA ‘Info Suggests Documents Catastrophically Bad For Dems’: Adam Schiff Leaks Dry Up

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: neo96
In legalese.

If information/evidence was obtained ILLEGALLY( and it was) it can't be used in a court of law.

Trump haters screwed themselves.

Fruit of the poisonous tree.

www.law.cornell.edu...

They've handed Flynn and Manafort a get out of jail free card.

Which is WHY they are blocking other members from seeing those abuses.

Tick tock.. I can’t wait to see the heads explode when all charges are dropped and case closed.

Unless the incriminating memo was also obtained illegally. Too soon to count eggs.

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Xcathdra


It's too bad Democrats have a majority in Congress. But just you wait until November!

Edit to add -- Lawmakers (most likely the minority Republican party) are pushing at this moment for the damning memo to immediately be made public.
Source: www.foxnews.com...

Maybe a brave soul will release it, like Diane Feinstein released GPS testimony transcripts last week.

Republicans control both houses.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: GuidedKill

That's been said for moths now. Yet no information has been made available.

My guess this is never released and is speculation talking points for another couple weeks until a new "damning" memo is found.

No damning memo was found. The 4 page memo in this case outlined the abuses of the FISA system and was provided to all 435 members of Congress.

I am thinking the memo is from Rep. Nunes. He has stated he would release the results of the investigation to all members of Congress this week. Nunes was the rep who sent investigators to the FBI/DOJ to physically seize the items he subpoenaed.

a reply to: Xcathdra

That's what two or three people say anyway.

Just like all the other damning stuff.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Funny they all just voted for the surveillance and nines himself put forth a barely more restrained version.

Your heroes are not to be trusted.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Xcathdra

That's what two or three people say anyway.

Just like all the other damning stuff.

Still waiting for you to cite your source / link your source from the 1st page please.

a reply to: luthier

Legislation can be blocked. Just as Democrats are blocking the release of their own criminal behavior.

a reply to: Xcathdra

From what? This new evidence three guys are talking about?

Once it's released it will actually be something.

I provided 3 sources from the clips I provided.

a reply to: Xcathdra

Where the proof of that? Where is the proof the Democrats first off can block this with a majority by republicans and where is the proof they are doing so.

Not saying it's not true but I have seen more partisan grand standing this year than I could have imagined.

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: Xcathdra

Where the proof of that? Where is the proof the Democrats first off can block this with a majority by republicans and where is the proof they are doing so.

Not saying it's not true but I have seen more partisan grand standing this year than I could have imagined.

First thanks for adding the sources. As for Bannon he has reached an agreement with Mueller to be interviewed by his team, the subpoena has been dropped by Muelller and Bannon wont have to testify in front of a grand jury.

As for Democrats and blocking - The committee that oversees this investigation is responsible for its release or block. Depending on what committee rules say it can be blocked from release by minority members. It is why Rep. King from New York filed a motion for a full vote to release the info.

In the Senate the ranking minority member (Feinstein) of the intel committee has the authority to release it unilaterally. The same does not apply for the House committee.

a reply to: Xcathdra

How did he get a lawyer an hour before the subpoena and why did he get THAT lawyer...look who he represents...

And where is the proof the Democrats are blocking this memo being released.

originally posted by: luthier
How did he get a lawyer an hour before the subpoena and why did he get THAT lawyer...look who he represents...

My guess would be that as head of Breitbart he has lawyers on speed dial.

CNN - Bannon will do interview with special counsel, avoiding grand jury for now

originally posted by: luthier
And where is the proof the Democrats are blocking this memo being released.

In the op sources.

“Fox is told that while the Intel Cmte voted in favor of the Simpson transcript, Democrats blocked the release of other documents. The committee has also voted on a motion by Rep. Pete King (R-NY) to make available to all House members a memo documenting abuse of the FISA program,” tweeted Pergram.

a reply to: Xcathdra

There was no proof there were words unconfirmed.

And I saw that he is working for Mueller. You just missed my point.

Why did he pick that lawyer. And was he tipped or had he already been interviewed? We wouldn't know if he was already working for the fbi.

originally posted by: Xcathdra
**Title edited to fit**

‘Info Suggests Documents Catastrophically Bad For Dems’: Leaks Dry Up After Adam Schiff Reviews FISA Abuse Proof

On Thursday, the House Intelligence Committee quietly voted to make available to fellow House members “a memo documenting abuse of the FISA program,” reports Fox News’ Chad Pergram.

With 435 House members, the likelihood of details from the memo leaking are high. And so are the stakes. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) voted against the motion after reviewing the memo last week. Is this why the leaks have all but dried up?

“Fox is told that while the Intel Cmte voted in favor of the Simpson transcript, Democrats blocked the release of other documents. The committee has also voted on a motion by Rep. Pete King (R-NY) to make available to all House members a memo documenting abuse of the FISA program,” tweeted Pergram.

click link for article..

Democrats also voted to block the release of information.

Republicans are calling for the complete release of all info. It apparently has massive implications concerning the bs Russia collusion probe in addition to exposing illegal acts by the FBI/DOJ.

Also it has been discovered that the Australian Diplomat that supposedly notified the FBI over Popadopolis is now linked to the newest FBI investigation into money laundering and other financial crimes committed by the Clinton Foundation. Apparently the diplomat is the person who helped arrange the deals between the Australian government and the Clinton Foundation.

When this is all over with people better be charged and see prison time, regardless if they have a D or R after their name.


Related reporting -
* - BOMBSHELL: Chairman Nunes Has Seen Clear Evidence of FISA ‘Abuse’ by FBI and DOJ Officials
* - Jan 10th 2018 - Was the DNC/Clinton campaign-funded dossier used to obtain warrants on Trump team from the secret court?
* - Jan 18th - HERE WE GO=> Rep DeSantis Demands Declassification of All DOJ Docs Related to Russia Dossier
* - Jan 11th - House votes to renew FISA program, following mixed messages from Trump
-* Jan 8th - EXCLUSIVE: House Intel Committee Has Received All Docs On Trump Dossier From DOJ, FBI

they wont be able to block it forever

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: Xcathdra


It's too bad Democrats have a majority in Congress. But just you wait until November!

Edit to add -- Lawmakers (most likely the minority Republican party) are pushing at this moment for the damning memo to immediately be made public.
Source: www.foxnews.com...

Maybe a brave soul will release it, like Diane Feinstein released GPS testimony transcripts last week.

Republicans control both houses.

Only in number. Not in phylosophy. Hence, Democrats MATTER.

a reply to: carewemust

Well then you have about 3 republicans. Good luck getting anymore.

People have been calling people like Amash and Paul nuts ever since they arrived.

I want to know more about Papadopoulos being a FBI mole, paid to infiltrate the Trump campaign, which lead to an illegal FISA spy-warrant.

a reply to: luthier

Chad Pergram
✔
@ChadPergram

Fox is told that while the Intel Cmte voted in favor of the Simpson transcript, Democrats blocked the release of other documents. The committee has also voted on a motion by Rep. Pete King (R-NY) to make available to all House members a memo documenting abuse of the FISA program.
10:08 AM - Jan 18, 2018

Major development in House Intel Committee *after* vote to release Glenn Simpson transcript. Rep Peter King offered motion to allow all House members to review a brief report summarizing committee investigation into what is called 'FISA abuse.' 1/3
10:16 AM - Jan 18, 2018

Motion was approved on party-line vote. Info in report is classified, so report will be available for House members to read in secure room. 2/3
10:17 AM - Jan 18, 2018

Byron York
✔
@ByronYork

Report contains answer to question of whether FBI/DOJ used Trump dossier to secure FISA warrant to spy on Americans, plus other issues. Now, whole House can know. Public still in dark. 3/3
10:17 AM - Jan 18, 2018

Byron York
✔
@ByronYork

House Intelligence Committee vote to release Glenn Simpson transcript was unanimous.
9:57 AM - Jan 18, 2018

Party line vote in the House.

A Bombshell House Intelligence report exposing extensive FISA abuse could lead to the removal of senior government officials

A review of a classified document outlining what is described as extensive Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse was made available to all House members Thursday and the revelations could lead to the removal of senior officials in the FBI and Department of Justice, several sources with knowledge of the document stated.

These sources say the report is “explosive,” stating they would not be surprised if it leads to the end of Robert Mueller’s Special Counsel investigation into President Trump and his associates.

saraacarter.com... officials/amp/?__twitter_impression=true