It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FISA ‘Info Suggests Documents Catastrophically Bad For Dems’: Adam Schiff Leaks Dry Up

page: 19
116
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:19 PM
link   
a reply to: GuidedKill

The radical left are crying to the sky already, so imagine the suicide hotline calls after the memo is released.




posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:28 PM
link   
After a year of this the usual suspects who always predict this is it..are doing so again.

Hilarious. The Democrats and Republicans have been playing gotcha this is it.

It's not folks. You can post all day long. It's a memo from a partisan. Same as if Schiff released some collusion documents.

It will be put up on who gives a crap.com..why because we won't be able to view the reference classified material. We have to take the guys word for it who has all the motive in the world to stop the investigations.

FISA warrants aren't based on a simple form like the dossier. Anyone who knows anything knows this. Unless the fisa courts are corrupt it don't work that way.

Second. The same morons just voted to renew the fisa surveillance..

Third only republican members have viewed this outside the Intel committee.


My guess they will play this release the document game for about a month. Then possibly release it without any reference material like the actual fisa applications.

Just going on the history of cherades from both parties here.

I think the people crying are going to be the ones who believe this will go anywhere but propaganda.


edit on 19-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

Anyone in congress can view the document.

Why do you think only republicans have viewed it? Because they are the only ones commenting about it?

Is the House Intel committee all republicans? Because they all viewed it.

It was the democrats on the Intel committee that voted to not allow the rest of congress to see it.


edit on R352018-01-19T14:35:17-06:00k351Vpm by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: Greven

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
My 2 cents: embarassing for elected officials is not a national security concern.

Ill throw in another penny, for general thoughts: if they claim too many secrets, it'll only raise hackles more among the populace

They cannot legitimately mark a document as classified simply due to embarrassment.

Documents are classified because they contain information that, were it to be disclosed, would harm national security.


Oh, i know how that works....

....but without seeing the documents that all this chatter is about, we wouldn't really know.

At some point you should weigh national security with the publics right to know about the wrong doing of their elected officials.


This is true. However a Devin Nunez memo isn't going to cut it. The actual material it's based on should be released at the same time or it will simply be dismissed. Rightfully so. It's the dumbest year of sensationalism I can remember in politics. Nunes and Schiff should go star in a Broadway play.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa
a reply to: luthier

Anyone in congress can view the document.

Why do you think only republicans have viewed it? Because they are the only ones commenting about it?

Is the House Intel committee all republicans? Because they all viewed it.



Many democrats have stated publicly they have no intent to view it.

that said...i'd bet they are liars. there's no way they'll stick their heads in the sand, unless they simply want plausible deniability



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:35 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

Yes I said so. The Intel committe and 145 republicans.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Possibly however it wreaks of propaganda.

It sure seems like releasing the refrence material isn't likely. Which certainly would be meaningless.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:36 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier


So if the democrats refuse to believe it or read it..does that make it go away?



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: thepixelpusher

If you would stop talking about her, maybe you'd stop hearing about her.
Media and the resistance keep putting her in the spotlight.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Greven
a reply to: thepixelpusher

If you would stop talking about her, maybe you'd stop hearing about her.


If we'd just stop meddling in other countries business.....

I've heard this line before.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:38 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

No. But a memo made by a guy with motives to stop the investigations or change public views for the midterms should be scrutinized by people with a brain. Particularly if you can't read the material it's based on.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: RickinVa

No. But a memo made by a guy with motives to stop the investigations or change public views for the midterms should be scrutinized by people with a brain. Particularly if you can't read the material it's based on.


How do you know who wrote the memo if you haven't read it?



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:43 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

It was made by Devin Nunes as a summary of the information he received from the fbi and doj...

I would like to read it however and it should be released and scrutinized. If its legit start the trials.

My opinion is the doj and fbi are alead doing the actual prosecution work if there is any. They are run by Trump's cabinet appointees.


I also wouldn't believe Adam Schiff if he released a memo stating trump was working with Russia without any reference material.

Guess that makes me a radical leftist.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier


What I read was that it was a summary of the House Intel committee's findings.

That doesn't seem to make it one man's opinion.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: GuidedKill

The radical left are crying to the sky already, so imagine the suicide hotline calls after the memo is released.


These threads are becoming comical.

They are mounds of BS molded into unicorns and then all the trumpites cheering they have found a unicorn.

Trump banged porn stars and paid them.

No doubt he had hookers pee on hotel beds as well, cowered to Putin, his idol etc.

This does not end well for Trump, Trumpites and the GOP.

Reality is gaining ground daily, simply cuz the truth matters.

Good luck in the mid-terms and 2020.



edit on 19-1-2018 by soberbacchus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: GuidedKill

originally posted by: thepixelpusher
a reply to: GuidedKill

I can't wait to see all the quick retirements of the Dems over this! Ha!


You and me both...I really can't wait to see the Alt-Left crying and screaming at the sky.. I sense a triggering of members and mods any day now!!


There is no 'alt-left.'
edit on 14Fri, 19 Jan 2018 14:49:56 -0600America/ChicagovAmerica/Chicago1 by Greven because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: soberbacchus


No doubt he had hookers pee on hotel beds as well, cowered to Putin, his idol etc.



Yes, I love it!

Most people defending the dossier say no one takes the pee story serious, and then someone like you comes along!

Good stuff!
edit on 19-1-2018 by Grambler because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

OK. I read it was a summary compiled by Devin Nunes. Though it doesn't matter to me if it's a trust me situation. Release the reference material

I stopped believing in the parties long ago..

I do think lynch is a dirty bird and it wouldn't surprise me in the least.

However the doj and fbi would be the ones to do it imo. Under a new hostile directorship to the Obama administration.

My prediction is a month of release the documents gets the press they want and then it fizzles down as the rebuttals are prepared.

If this was alarming damning evidence the doj and Wray would be acting quickly or actually putting a solid case together.

If a memo is released the case could actually be harmed. Giving the defense plenty of time to prepare.
edit on 19-1-2018 by luthier because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Fix your quoting if you have any clue how.

inventing quotes by posters is a severe T&C violation.



posted on Jan, 19 2018 @ 02:51 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier

If Nunez created this false memo in a vacuum, then why isn't the Intel Dems who voted not to share this with the House...not screaming from their podiums and/or tweeting that the memo is false, bogus, lies?

Especially since for everyone else who reads it is disturbed at what is in it. Why are the Dems being sooooo quiet? Why are they not alleviating everyone's concerns by sharing that this memo is ALL Nunez lies?



new topics

top topics



 
116
<< 16  17  18    20  21  22 >>

log in

join