It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Gandalf77
IN other words, nowhere. Survival of the fittest, my friend. The laws of nature have always dictated that the strongest survive, the smartest survive, and the ones who can combine those two in the highest amounts thrive. Life sucks, buy a helmet.
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Gandalf77
IN other words, nowhere. Survival of the fittest, my friend. The laws of nature have always dictated that the strongest survive, the smartest survive, and the ones who can combine those two in the highest amounts thrive. Life sucks, buy a helmet.
Live by the sword, die by the sword....
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Gandalf77
IN other words, nowhere. Survival of the fittest, my friend. The laws of nature have always dictated that the strongest survive, the smartest survive, and the ones who can combine those two in the highest amounts thrive. Life sucks, buy a helmet.
Live by the sword, die by the sword....
...and yet Jesus also commanded his disciples "if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one."
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: Gargoyle91
That's a good change, assuming we can prove it was state actors who conducted the attack, this can often times be difficult to do with cyber attacks. At the same time though, the US needs to adopt a no first strike policy in regards to nukes or any other WMD's.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
If we can get past the silly ideology that "OMG, nuclear weapons are so evil, we should never, EVER even have them, let alone consider using them" and move on to the reality of "There are potentially rogue and/or hostile nations in the world today which possess nuclear weapons, meaning it would be a really dumb idea for the US to flinch in any way where mutually assured destruction is concerned," we will understand this change in policy a lot better. Let's face a simple fact, the country's lifeblood is now cyber-integrated. Take out the power grid for the country and you've crippled that country just as surely as it would have been crippled 50 years ago had Russia launched a few nukes at major US hubs. People would die in such a cyber attack, as well. A lot of people depending on circumstances. Knock out the power grid in Minneapolis in January and folks would freeze within 24 hours. Knock it out in Phoenix in July and scores would die of heat related illness. Knock it out in a place like LA or NYC and the riots would kill more than a strategic small yield nuclear strike could ever dream of killing. So yeah, considering the devastating effects a major cyber attack could have on this country, I'd sure as hell hope that whatever country was behind such action would see their capital rendered to a smoldering crater within 30 minutes of US Intel determining who did it.
So why the policy change? Simple... make sure those foreign countries' leaders KNOW that a major cyber attack on the US coming from their country will result in a United States boot straight up their ass, stomp a mudhole and walk it dry style. Fear steadies hands and cools heads a lot faster than singing Kumbaya and holding hands around a fire does where geopolitics are concerned.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: AngryCymraeg
Nuclear weapons covers a wide spectrum of devices and functions. There are plenty of them available that do not release a mushroom cloud, don't create the airborne disaster you're concerned about, and don't render the blast site uninhabitable for years. If the Short Fat One attacks my country, I honestly don't think "Oh, what will happen to Japan" should be the primary concern of this country's leaders in preparing their retaliation.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: Gandalf77
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Gandalf77
IN other words, nowhere. Survival of the fittest, my friend. The laws of nature have always dictated that the strongest survive, the smartest survive, and the ones who can combine those two in the highest amounts thrive. Life sucks, buy a helmet.
Live by the sword, die by the sword....
...and yet Jesus also commanded his disciples "if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one."