It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mirageman
The biggest question to ask is why does 'ufology' believe there to be a massive international establisment cover-up over the subject but then continually depend on people from officialdom to tell them the truth they seek.
Think about it.
originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: Scrubdog
Believe me I have looked at this case for years. Colonel Halt's memo to the UK MoD and tape are both contemporary evidence that something happened. But his memo is full of basic errors. Not something you'd expect from the Deputy Base Commander. The original witness statements do not indicate any such missing time. Colonel Halt took those statements. So something is being twisted again.
Gary Heseltine also has an agenda, like I said earlier, because he is involved in a new documentary focusing on Larry Warren's story. See : www.capelgreen.co.uk...
Peter Robbins who co-authored "Left at East Gate" with Warren has since distanced himself from him due to inconsistencies with his story. See : Daily Mirror
If you are really interested in the whole case and willing to spend sometime looking beyond the soundbites then I suggest you read through : Rendlesham Forest…, A Christmas Story from 1980 - Can We ‘Let it Be’?. Or at least skip to the summary here
The Rendlesham incident is far too complex to explain in any detail here. Because it can go from nothing much really happened at all other than a bunch of US servicemen goofing around to a massive Cold War conspiracy. Most people won't bother looking beyond a bloke touched a spaceship and received a binary code (even though his witness statement said he never got closer than 50m to whatever it was that was seen).
I don't want to ask too much more of you, but if it's enjoyable to you, I would be fascinated to hear your best guess as to what you think did or did not happen.
if one was "contemporaneously abducted" don't you think there'd be a "Holy sht! We just got abducted!" somewhere on the tape?? That seems silly.
But, just bc we can say "They're jumping on the profit boat now" doesn't necessarily render the original story wrong
I also think corroborating details are really important, what was the temp?
I believe it was within the pages of project condon that it was revealed that Burroughs had been exposed to terahertz radiation at Rendlesham which is what prompted him to get his medical cover reinstated by the USAF due to the illnesses he has suffered as a result.
"The well-reported Rendlesham Forest/Bentwaters event is an example where it might be postulated that several observers were probably exposed to UAP [Unidentified Aerial Phenomenon] radiation for longer than normal UAP sighting periods."
......the stuff about the abduction is harder to find so it's no wonder general people haven't really heard of it. But it was the abduction section that gave us "co-ordinates" to Hy Brasil and stuff...
Early in the morning of 27 Dec 80 (approximately 0300L) two USAF security police patrolmen saw unusual lights outside the back gate at RAF Woodbridge