It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DrStevenBrule
originally posted by: SprocketUK
originally posted by: DrStevenBrule
Why is "diversity" and "multiculturalism" NEVER pushed in any non white country when whites are in terms of global population a minority?
Possibly because, as President Trump said, they are all ....holes that people want to leave rather than go to.
Sounds like if they had more white people they wouldn't be such holes then.
You know strength through diversity and all that jazz.
It is not that they wish to raise up the other races because that would make their profits much less. Instead, the aim is to destroy the Western traditional male because he had too many rights, was too spoilt, always wanting acceptable wages and living standards and was pretty empowered in contrast to his racially diverse oppressed cousins.
originally posted by: cenpuppie
It is not that they wish to raise up the other races because that would make their profits much less. Instead, the aim is to destroy the Western traditional male because he had too many rights, was too spoilt, always wanting acceptable wages and living standards and was pretty empowered in contrast to his racially diverse oppressed cousins.
This is where I stop, your incorrect in your assumption. I find it funny that white people think its only white people that fight for their rights and stuff, that's the white privilege that everyone screams about be it in a negative or positive connotation.
It's that privilege that makes one believe their group is center of it all...
You don't open many history books do you? Cause if you did you would know that you've been lied too and are perpetuating a lie in this thread. Point of fact, EVERY Race, Creed, or religion has been involved in the slave trade at one point or another, both as owners and slaves... yes that does in fact include white people. Before you go spouting liberal BS please read some history books and educate yourself. Thank you.
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: Revolution9
The white males are the ones throughout history who have BEEN the oppressors, that's how come they aren't usually oppressed. That also happens to be the reason that they SEEM to be under attack, it is simply because many regular folks want all races and genders to have an equal chance.
Note that it is not white men who are under attack for the most part, but it is the aspect of white men suppressing others that is under attack. Some white men perceive this as a threat as they are used to getting gains by suppressing others, such as women today, homosexuals today, and other races both now and in the past (but much more in the past). If they are religious, they wish to suppress others who have different viewpoints than theirs instead of just focusing on their own views and how they apply to their own lives.
The goal is for the white man to be equal, and not a suppressor. That is basically it. For someone who is used to oppressing or suppressing others for personal gains, such as historically, white slave owners, or today, possibly a white man (and presumably other men as well) enjoying massive income inequality over women in the workforce, it does seem threatening to lose that ability to abuse power.
Sad but why does colour have to be the defining factor? why can't it be as simple as who is a better fit for the job, who will perform the job better? Shouldn't those be the criteria we use to hire someone? Not Colour? Or are you implying something with your statement? Like maybe that people of colour aren't as well suited for some of these jobs and thus need an added helping hand? To be honest that how it sounds every time someone uses your excuse for purposely excluding one or more races from anything. Anyway If you are indeed saying that they need the help, you should maybe take a moment and reexamine the thoughts that lead you to that conclusion.
originally posted by: darkhold
originally posted by: slider1982
It is totally fair game to be racist towards not just white men but white people in general, it is only that a good portion of the populas, as in native Europeans are to polite to point out the obvious.. My local court was requesting people to come forward as magistrates, it stated people from ethnic backwards where advantageous, how the hell is that being equal??... It should be on the quality of the person nothing more...
Maybe they wanted a court that was a representation of the population and an all white magistrate may not be it.
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: Revolution9
The white males are the ones throughout history who have BEEN the oppressors, that's how come they aren't usually oppressed. That also happens to be the reason that they SEEM to be under attack, it is simply because many regular folks want all races and genders to have an equal chance.
Note that it is not white men who are under attack for the most part, but it is the aspect of white men suppressing others that is under attack. Some white men perceive this as a threat as they are used to getting gains by suppressing others, such as women today, homosexuals today, and other races both now and in the past (but much more in the past). If they are religious, they wish to suppress others who have different viewpoints than theirs instead of just focusing on their own views and how they apply to their own lives.
The goal is for the white man to be equal, and not a suppressor. That is basically it. For someone who is used to oppressing or suppressing others for personal gains, such as historically, white slave owners, or today, possibly a white man (and presumably other men as well) enjoying massive income inequality over women in the workforce, it does seem threatening to lose that ability to abuse power.
Why the Western Male is Being Dumped and collectively character assassinated.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
A lot of it has to do with the inequality that wealth brings to the legal system.
You literally said "the western man is on the road to extinction". If you really believe that and are against it hypothetically happening, then you'd advocate that more "western" people mshould have children. Decreasing the amount of kids in other cultures wouldn't stop people in the West from hypothetically going "extinct", as you put it. Only increasing the birthrate in the West would work.