Personally (and I know exactly squat about 4Chan), from the little bit that I've tried to understand, I think FBI-Anon is the real deal. Most of this
madness over on 4Chan started after FBI-Anon posted a series of posts about a year ago. Meganon and Q were never mentioned (not by FBI-Anon nor
anyone else). So, what I think happened is, ... FBI-Anon's posts got some pretty good traction due to a pretty solid air of credibility, and other's
jumped in and started imitating FBI-Anon's cryptic style.
One of the interesting things about FBI-Anon (and I wish I could find this again) was they explained the "why" and the "how" of why they were saying
some of the things they did, and how it all worked. And, as it turned out, they were absolutely correct...and I know this from real world dealings on
similar issues. Only somebody who really works in that kind of a world would know those things, and FBI-anon did. They said just enough stuff that
was off the wall and crazy to polarize a lot of people, and this threw people off (intentionally). It was all aimed at maintaining their own
(FBI-anon's) anonymity and shielding their identity. If you stripped off all that "noise" and read the rest of what they were saying at face value it
was shockingly accurate.
I personally don't think FBI-anon is actually FBI, I think they work somewhere else in the government (and are very well placed / connected to say the
things they do) , but it's not how most think (or where). I'm not going to share my theory of where I think they work for two reasons; one because I
believe I'm correct, and two because if I am correct then it might actually compromise their ability to post again in the future (even if I did it
So, in summary, I think Q and meganon, along with all the other "anon"s, are all just posers trying to gain the same notoriety that FBI-anon first
did. FBI-anon posted a lot of stuff (like reams of stuff) and a lot of it is still coming true, almost EXACTLY as predicted, and almost without
I could be wrong, but that's my .02 on the whole thing.
edit...And just so you don't think I am being equally 'cryptic' about FBI-anon's identity, here's why I wrote what I did... FBI-Anon said a few
things which they probably thought were innocuous enough, and it wasn't even the point of what they were saying but rather an aside. It had to do
with the form some of the information they were posting about came in. There's only about .0000000001% of the population who would have known that
tiny little fact. To most it was seemingly insignificant, but it was just that one tiny little detail which spoke volumes about not only who they
were, but what they did and how they had access to the things they were saying. And that was when all the pieces of the puzzle came together and it
all made sense.
edit on 1/17/2018 by Flyingclaydisk because: (no reason given)