It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: StoutBroux
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: sligtlyskeptical
originally posted by: amfirst1
a reply to: DanteGaland
Well at the moment there is no proof. Where is the transaction or documentation as far as anyone knows it could be another fake news by the liberal establishment.
Trumps lawyer has admitted to paying her $130,000. For nothing?
From a previously unknown, anonymous LLC in Delaware BTW.
The LLC was only revealed because of the lawyers on the receiving end of the Stormy Daniels payment.
You can only imagine what the accounting history, deposits and payments of that dark payola fund looks like.
Muellers team must constantly think "where the hell does this end".
I think Mueller's team is thinking about a whole lot else and doesn't give a rat's a$$ about this issue other than how they can use it to keep the focus off of themselves for all the crap they are trying to keep under wrap.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
I think it was the first time in history that the First Lady didn't arrive with the POTUS at the state of the union.
Likely there is some kind of lucrative nuptial agreement in place to avoid the embarrassment of Trump becoming the first POTUS in history to have the First Lady divorce them while in office.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
I think it was the first time in history that the First Lady didn't arrive with the POTUS at the state of the union.
Likely there is some kind of lucrative nuptial agreement in place to avoid the embarrassment of Trump becoming the first POTUS in history to have the First Lady divorce them while in office.
Interestingly liberals didn't care much about that and blamed Republicans for a witch hunt.
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
I think it was the first time in history that the First Lady didn't arrive with the POTUS at the state of the union.
Likely there is some kind of lucrative nuptial agreement in place to avoid the embarrassment of Trump becoming the first POTUS in history to have the First Lady divorce them while in office.
Interestingly liberals didn't care much about that and blamed Republicans for a witch hunt.
You do remember that the GOP decided that Bill Clinton lying about having an affair warranted full impeachment proceedings?
Alas, Trump repeatedly lies about his team and own son meeting with Russian agents and the GOP screams...Look away!!!
Of course I appreciate the "but, but...BILL CLINTON!!!" retort though.
It was an overdue and predictable fallacious defense of the indefensible. Not unusual though.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
I think it was the first time in history that the First Lady didn't arrive with the POTUS at the state of the union.
Likely there is some kind of lucrative nuptial agreement in place to avoid the embarrassment of Trump becoming the first POTUS in history to have the First Lady divorce them while in office.
Interestingly liberals didn't care much about that and blamed Republicans for a witch hunt.
You do remember that the GOP decided that Bill Clinton lying about having an affair warranted full impeachment proceedings?
Alas, Trump repeatedly lies about his team and own son meeting with Russian agents and the GOP screams...Look away!!!
Of course I appreciate the "but, but...BILL CLINTON!!!" retort though.
It was an overdue and predictable fallacious defense of the indefensible. Not unusual though.
Learn your history.
Clinton was not impeached for lying. he was impeached for lying under oath.
originally posted by: jjkenobi
Proven false by everyone involved in the story.
Just like every other made up story about Trump.
It must get depressing getting your hopes up every time some idiot "journalist" site runs these hit pieces only to find out later they're made up.
So the question is this: Will there be an audit of his financial records to verify that it was his money?
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
I think it was the first time in history that the First Lady didn't arrive with the POTUS at the state of the union.
Likely there is some kind of lucrative nuptial agreement in place to avoid the embarrassment of Trump becoming the first POTUS in history to have the First Lady divorce them while in office.
originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Accepting this as genuine...
He cheated on Melania.
While I’ve no respect for adulterous people...
This is a private matter for them.
How is this gossip any good for ATS?
originally posted by: CynConcepts
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
I think it was the first time in history that the First Lady didn't arrive with the POTUS at the state of the union.
Likely there is some kind of lucrative nuptial agreement in place to avoid the embarrassment of Trump becoming the first POTUS in history to have the First Lady divorce them while in office.
Why do you think there is some agreement not to divorce while he is in office? Did Hillary divorce Bill...even after they left office or after she lost BIGLY to Trump? Did Huma divorce Weiner boy...no she did not. Seriously, adultery does not mean divorce is imminent or a specific contract has been created....other than...the vows that they took seriously when they said I do.
originally posted by: CynConcepts
originally posted by: soberbacchus
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Arnie123
Yeah nefarious reasons like keeping voters from knowing they could elect someone with no moral backbone. I hope his wife turns her back on him. He's no husband.
I think it was the first time in history that the First Lady didn't arrive with the POTUS at the state of the union.
Likely there is some kind of lucrative nuptial agreement in place to avoid the embarrassment of Trump becoming the first POTUS in history to have the First Lady divorce them while in office.
Why do you think there is some agreement not to divorce while he is in office? Did Hillary divorce Bill...even after they left office or after she lost BIGLY to Trump?
Did Huma divorce Weiner boy...no she did not.
Seriously, adultery does not mean divorce is imminent.