Trump Lawyer Arranged $130,000 Payment for Adult-Film Star’s Silence

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: Vector99
a reply to: Hazardous1408

The woman that was supposedly paid hush money has already spoke out and said this is BS. It's fake news.

Do you know how an NDA works?

Jesus.

Yes, an NDA would dictate she say nothing, "no comment," walk away in silence if asked about it. She did not do that, she outright denies it all. That's not an NDA.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

But But, I'm the one that doesn't know how they work!

a reply to: Vector99

I believe the porn star story more than the pee deal..in any case I could care less, I was only replying on the 100% likelyhood of a NDA.

originally posted by: AMPTAH

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
Accepting this as genuine...

He cheated on Melania.

I can guarantee you that Donald did not cheat on Melania while he was in the White House, unlike other, ahem, residents.

He's been too busy tweeting.

And we know that a billionaire makes money to enjoy all that life has to offer, which is probably a lot more than Russian golden showers.

So, it's no surprise that money flows from Trump to all sorts of women.

He be tweetin'
Can't be cheatin'
Step out yo seat n'
Be more fleet'n.

You got yourself some rhymes there.

a reply to: vonclod

This is the kind of mindset that amuses me. You hate Trump so you are willing to believe extreme stories that are flat out denied. To convince yourself you believe the NDA as a valid argument, and since it was printed, it must be true. You easily fall for fake news.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

Please source this “dictate” you claim would prevent her from denying any accusations.

What you say just sounds like a jibberish way of not being able to accept Trump’s potential behaviour to me.

And my search efforts have not led me to any sort of source suggesting such.

a reply to: burdman30ott6

I disagree.

The following would be something that would breach an NDA

The owner must believe that disclosing the information would cause them damage or would give advantages to their rivals or others.

A denial does not do that.

Remember, an NDA is simply an agreement wherein two or more parties agree to keep certain privileged information confidential or secret.

A denial is fulfilling that.

a reply to: Vector99

Sounds like Hillary haters.

Moon boot to hide an ankle bracelet lol.

a reply to: Vector99

Why would a thin skinned coward admit it?, I honestly don't know enough about the story to know or give a f one way or another.
I repeat..I commented because some are so blind to the possibility its true, a denial means nothing if you account for an NDA

a reply to: Chadwickus

I'm not too fond of Hillary, but yea, that's a ridiculous accusation.

Whether it’s true or not, Trumpites will support him through hypocrisy and double standards

a reply to: DanteGaland

Whats wrong with an out-of-court settlement?

Happens all the time?

If he paid that out of a his 'Charity', well that's a different matter...

if i had 130k, and ' flower tucci' was up for it, im not gonna lie.


we already accepted Trumps character ; not the greatest morally sound person. however we have more pressing issues than this...

This is a silly question but I'm unfamiliar with the US legal system

Could the porn actress have extorted Trump saying that she'd lie about them meeting causing a huge scandal. Mud sticks, it would have lost the election. Taking her to court and sueing for slander wouldnt exhonerate him in many peoples minds

originally posted by: Kalixi
This is a silly question but I'm unfamiliar with the US legal system

Could the porn actress have extorted Trump saying that she'd lie about them meeting causing a huge scandal. Mud sticks, it would have lost the election. Taking her to court and sueing for slander wouldnt exhonerate him in many peoples minds

It wouldn't have changed a thing.

One of the few truths he's told:

Yeah right, the rabid Left would have thrown 13 million dollars at her to speak words against Trump so how would some chump change like 130k keep her quiet to this day?

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: burdman30ott6

Please source this “dictate” you claim would prevent her from denying any accusations.

What you say just sounds like a jibberish way of not being able to accept Trump’s potential behaviour to me.

And my search efforts have not led me to any sort of source suggesting such.

No response to this? From you or whoever starred you?

Shocking.
😂😂😂

a reply to: vonclod

I commented because some are so blind to the possibility its true, a denial means nothing if you account for an NDA

That is exactly what liberals are selling this on. She would make a lot more exposing this scandal than sticking to the NDA. An NDA cannot exceed written law, so depending on where it was written it would be limited to the local laws. You will not find a law on any book that would keep this woman from making millions by exposing her story.

originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Yeah right, the rabid Left would have thrown 13 million dollars at her to speak words against Trump so how would some chump change like 130k keep her quiet to this day?

Yep.. $130k is too little. Clinton Foundation offered $750k to a FAKE Trump accuser. She chickened-out 3 days before the Presidential election. The day before she was supposed to make the announcement.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

What? What in the world is the “rabid left”? Lol

Again... Trumpites: “if you disagree with me, you’re a leftist”