It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To a worker living paycheck to paycheck, or who is one small emergency away from overdrawing their account, $1,000 is a significant difference in their lives.
originally posted by: rnaa
a reply to: Ameilia
To a worker living paycheck to paycheck, or who is one small emergency away from overdrawing their account, $1,000 is a significant difference in their lives.
Shutting down Sams, putting thousands of people out of work, is also a significant difference in their lives.
$11 dollars an hour is still not a living wage and means that those workers will continue to rely on food stamps. Which means that Walmart getting the American Taxpayer to directly subsidize its payroll.
originally posted by: rnaa
a reply to: Ameilia
To a worker living paycheck to paycheck, or who is one small emergency away from overdrawing their account, $1,000 is a significant difference in their lives.
Shutting down Sams, putting thousands of people out of work, is also a significant difference in their lives.
$11 dollars an hour is still not a living wage and means that those workers will continue to rely on food stamps. Which means that Walmart getting the American Taxpayer to directly subsidize its payroll.
originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed
a reply to: carewemust
They are pathetic crumbs, regardless of what she is her statement is factually correct.
originally posted by: fiverx313
she's right.
i notice you don't offer anything to contradict her, just some personal attacks.
give them a living wage, insurance, pension, paid vacations. they make money hand over foot, they can afford it!
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlackmoonJester
Your analogy reminds me of the $40,000 worker who was "insulted" because his 5% tax cut is $2,000, while the $500,000 owner's 5% tax cut is $25,000 @ year. "Very VERY UNFAIR!", he exclaimed.
originally posted by: BlackmoonJester
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: BlackmoonJester
Your analogy reminds me of the $40,000 worker who was "insulted" because his 5% tax cut is $2,000, while the $500,000 owner's 5% tax cut is $25,000 @ year. "Very VERY UNFAIR!", he exclaimed.
I must have explained it wrong then. I don't care how much they get, as long as I too get something. Pretty sure all us normal folk would love a flat tax, but it's not happening soon, so I am very thankful for any little bit I can save now. Baby steps.