It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
Investigate all you like. Knock yourself out.
Just stop comparing the two situations.
It is a false equivalence at best.
So finally, after months of calling anyone who though hillarys team or the dnc should be investigated for this all sort s of names, and fighting tooth and nail that there shouldnt be an investigation.
For future reference, you may want to avoid name calling and insulting people, as it turns out they may be right and you wrong like in this situation.
originally posted by: Grambler
Seems to be coming from Sara Carter, who I think has been pretty good.
Here is the article.
The unverified dossier alleging connections between President Trump’s campaign and the Russians was used as evidence by the FBI to gain approval from a secret court to monitor members of Trump’s team, this reporter has learned.
A large portion of the evidence presented in the salacious 35-page dossier put together by former British spy Christopher Steele, has either been proven wrong or remains unsubstantiated. However, the FBI gained approval nevertheless to surveil members of Trump’s campaign and “it’s outrageous and clearly should be thoroughly investigated,” said a senior law enforcement source, with knowledge of the process.
Multiple sources told this reporter that the dossier was used along with other evidence to obtain the warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, known as FISC. The sources also stressed that there will be more information in the coming week regarding systemic “FISA abuse.”
saraacarter.com...
The dreaded anonymous sources.
So I will not believe it until I see more proof.
Apparently rep. Jim Jordan who I like was on Hannity discussing this with sara carter, so I will watch to see what he said on it.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Grambler
That sure doesnt spread good faith man
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: AboveBoard
The fbi was aware it was unsubstantiated and suspect. And used it anyway to trample the rights of a us citizen by unmasking, then shared that information with foreign governments.
Nothing Trump may have done can justify this.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Grambler
That sure doesnt spread good faith man
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: AboveBoard
The fbi was aware it was unsubstantiated and suspect. And used it anyway to trample the rights of a us citizen by unmasking, then shared that information with foreign governments.
Nothing Trump may have done can justify this.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Grambler
That sure doesnt spread good faith man
What, telling someone not to call others names and insult them for being wrong, only to have to finally admit they are wrong is not good faith?
Did I call him a name?
I dont think so. I was just commenting on why personal attacks should be avoided, because you may just be wrong and it will look bad.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: introvert
Because a foreign agent was contracted to sway the election. Ie, collusion.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: introvert
Im not a fan of low brow. I respect many of you guys....and like to keep it that way.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: introvert
Because a foreign agent was contracted to sway the election. Ie, collusion.
But unlike the alleged Trump collusion, the collusion involved in obtaining this dossier is a CRIME. Bye-Bye Hillary!
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Grambler
That sure doesnt spread good faith man
What, telling someone not to call others names and insult them for being wrong, only to have to finally admit they are wrong is not good faith?
Did I call him a name?
I dont think so. I was just commenting on why personal attacks should be avoided, because you may just be wrong and it will look bad.
Where did I admit I was wrong?