It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: Kalixi
Goody, you've authored another Trump thread.
Paid per post it seems.
Experts are saying that the situation surrounding Fire and Fury is unprecedented in American history. The story I posted here is huge news. It is not speculation but verifiable fact.
What experts and is it unprecedented because the FBI has never used a political opposition research document to obtain a FISA warrant in its history?
Trump’s lawyer threatens unprecedented libel lawsuit against ‘Fire and Fury’ author, publisher
The "unprecedented" part isn't a matter of opinion as far as I can tell.
Oh my that is huge!!! Yawning.
So you haven’t read the book! That is what I thought.
Should you pursue litigation against Henry Holt or Mr. Wolff, we are quite confident that documents related to the contents of the book in the possession of President Trump, his family members, his businesses, his campaign, and his administration will prove particularly relevant to our defense.
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: Kalixi
Goody, you've authored another Trump thread.
Paid per post it seems.
Experts are saying that the situation surrounding Fire and Fury is unprecedented in American history. The story I posted here is huge news. It is not speculation but verifiable fact.
What experts and is it unprecedented because the FBI has never used a political opposition research document to obtain a FISA warrant in its history?
Trump’s lawyer threatens unprecedented libel lawsuit against ‘Fire and Fury’ author, publisher
The "unprecedented" part isn't a matter of opinion as far as I can tell.
Oh my that is huge!!! Yawning.
So you haven’t read the book! That is what I thought.
I haven't read the book because I see it as tabloid-level drivel. The reason this thread is so important is because if President Trump sues the publisher then that opinion of mine could change in a heartbeat. That would probably happen with millions of others around the world as well. Can you see why this thread is so important now?
Todays rumors from the book could become tomorrow's facts...with a lawsuit.
During the campaign trail Trump made a comment about "suing the # out of them, like they've never been sued before," and it was adamantly defended on ATS.
originally posted by: antiantonym
a reply to: RomeByFire
I can't recognize any principles among Trump supporters. Today Trump announced that he expects a deal on DACA to be done. That was a huge red line for Trump supporters before the election, but now they seem fine with keeping it.
They're fine with Trump's reversal of his position on the official story of 911, they're fine with Trump having endorsed the official story concerning the Las Vegas shooting immediately, and they're fine with Trump endorsing other official government positions that he used to be against.
Trump supporters are fine with Trump's failures on everything from Obamacare to draining the swamp.
I don't know what they're supporting, and I don't think they do either.
originally posted by: olaru12
I wonder why the WH invited Wolff into the WH to archive the Trump transition from campaign to the presidency.
They only have themselves to blame for not vetting Wolff properly. You reap what you sow...apparently!
It's what happens when you let Jared and Don jr. run the show. Light weight dorks....
Try Googling "The Dunning-Kruger President." New York magazine, Salon, and Politico have recently published articles on that theme. They're referring to Donald Trump and to the Dunning-Kruger effect, a psychological principle that is becoming a lot better known than it once was.
Named for Cornell psychologist David Dunning and his then-grad student Justin Kruger, this is the observation that people who are ignorant or unskilled in a given domain tend to believe they are much more competent than they are. Thus bad drivers believe they're good drivers, the humorless think they know what's funny, and people who've never held public office think they're make a terrific president. How hard can it be?
www.psychologytoday.com...
originally posted by: RomeByFire
.... why I refer to them as cultists. Obama supporters (on ATS) weren't nearly this radical.
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: whywhynot
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: Kalixi
Goody, you've authored another Trump thread.
Paid per post it seems.
Experts are saying that the situation surrounding Fire and Fury is unprecedented in American history. The story I posted here is huge news. It is not speculation but verifiable fact.
What experts and is it unprecedented because the FBI has never used a political opposition research document to obtain a FISA warrant in its history?
Trump’s lawyer threatens unprecedented libel lawsuit against ‘Fire and Fury’ author, publisher
The "unprecedented" part isn't a matter of opinion as far as I can tell.
Oh my that is huge!!! Yawning.
So you haven’t read the book! That is what I thought.
I haven't read the book because I see it as tabloid-level drivel. The reason this thread is so important is because if President Trump sues the publisher, then that opinion of mine could change in a heartbeat. That would probably happen with millions of others around the world as well. Can you see why this thread is so important now?
Todays rumors from the book could become tomorrow's facts...with a lawsuit.
originally posted by: TheLead
a reply to: whywhynot
I haven't read it, but wondering the format? All out named interviews? Novelist interpretation mixed with select anonymous quoting or what?