It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did Liberals Forget About The Goldwater Rule?

page: 3
53
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:28 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Dude it doesn't matter how many threads anyone makes we can choose not to read or partake and that goes for everyone
.




posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

You call them a bunch of liberal arts graduates I call them concerned citizens acting on conscience.


Funny I call them a bunch of political hacks.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler




I am unsure where you are looking, by my count I have 42 threads started here, and not all of them are in relation to Trump.

Can you provide evidence I have 59 threads started?


You profile says 59 threads, that may include threads that have been removed by mods.


Interesting.
Can you take a screenshot of that so I can see it?

ETA, I see where you seen that statistic.
If you count the actual numbers underneath it comes out to 42

I have only had a couple threads removed.

Something doesn't add up.

edit on 8-1-2018 by EvidenceNibbler because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:31 AM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan


stated by people in this profession gets turned into headlines like


Yeah, on the one hand it's concerning, and one of the reasons for, I suppose, section 7.3: because that opinion is used thusly. We've all seen that movie before, everyone says you're nuts because you act it, and try to lock you up, etc, but you're really not nuts. And we all know what headlines can...

Then again, also a tactic seen in third world dictatorships is the attempt by a head of state to silence critics, including the press, when less than favorable opinions are published.

edit on 8-1-2018 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:31 AM
link   
Is anyone really surprised ?

The left hijacked the science for their sacred cow global warming.

Why should it surprise anyone they hijacked mental health to suit their agenda.

And that agenda is obvious.

Get rid of Trump.

The end justifies the means.

ETA : forgot hijacking science telling men and women they get a choice of being a man or a woman.

Hijacked it again with a fetus is just a clump of cells.

The nazis got nothing on liberals.
edit on 8-1-2018 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Dude it doesn't matter how many threads anyone makes we can choose not to read or partake and that goes for everyone
.


I never said anything about having a problem with participating in the thread or having a rant about the number of threads.

My question is for those who storm onto every thread I write to tell me about how I am “obsessed” with Trump yet give the guy whose been hear only 2weeks and posts 2 or 3 threads a day on Trump yet gets a free pass.

Why are they not calling out the OP for this?



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:32 AM
link   
"My guy says your guy is a poo poo head"

"Well, your guy who said that about my guy is actually the poo poo head"

"Liar! All you do is make 100 threads about poo poo heads"

"You sir, are the liar. I've only made 97 threads about poo poo heads"



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:33 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Because of their political bias you said it yourself.
Check your pm dude
.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:34 AM
link   

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Because of their political bias you said it yourself.
Check your pm dude
.


Meh I know that just wanted to see if any would have the integrity to admit to it.

Back to the OP

When is trump going to undertake a independent psychiatric evaluation?
edit on 8-1-2018 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Never just like releasing his Tax records
.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:35 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


My question is for those who storm onto every thread I write to tell me about how I am “obsessed” with Trump yet give the guy whose been hear only 2weeks and posts 2 or 3 threads a day on Trump yet gets a free pass.
You are seriously not smart enough to figure out why this happens?
For real?
hahahahahaaaaa



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:36 AM
link   

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Never just like releasing his Tax records
.


Wow! Dude...

Don’t go there, some ForeverTrump cultist will have a heart attack



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:37 AM
link   
Has anyone thought that the mastermind behind his downfall is/will be Pence?.



More scared of Pence tbh.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:39 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


When is trump going to undertake a independent psychological evaluation?

You want him to see a Psychologist?
I'd say sending him to a Psychiatrist would be the wiser choice?
They are actual doctors, not puffed up therapists.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:42 AM
link   

originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


When is trump going to undertake a independent psychological evaluation?

You want him to see a Psychologist?
I'd say sending him to a Psychiatrist would be the wiser choice?
They are actual doctors, not puffed up therapists.


Sorry yes psychiatric (autocorrect playing up)

So when is he going going to under go a independent psychiatric assessment?



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:47 AM
link   
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler

when you alert on a post, it makes a thread in the staff area that you cannot see.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:48 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin




So when is he going going to under go a independent psychiatric assessment?

Why would a Very Stable Genius need to go talk to a psychiatrist?
He's smarter than they are, it would do no good.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:49 AM
link   
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin




Sorry yes psychiatric (autocorrect playing up)

Yea right......
Try just owning your mistakes sometimes, it would make you look better.
edit on 8-1-2018 by EvidenceNibbler because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan


stated by people in this profession gets turned into headlines like


Yeah, on the one hand it's concerning, and one of the reasons for, I suppose, section 7.3: because that opinion is used thusly. We've all seen that movie before, everyone says you're nuts because you act it, and try to lock you up, etc, but you're really not nuts. And we all know what headlines can...

Then again, also a tactic seen in third world dictatorships is the attempt by a head of state to silence critics, including the press, when less than favorable opinions are published.


But tit for tat doesn't make America better.

If you think he is a third world dictator, your best bet is to lure independants with rational arguments.

If i decide to vote in 2020, and that was today, there's a good chance i'd vote Trump. Not because I approve of him insomuch as because his opposition has made him at least palatable in comparison.



posted on Jan, 8 2018 @ 10:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin




So when is he going going to under go a independent psychiatric assessment?

Why would a Very Stable Genius need to go talk to a psychiatrist?
He's smarter than they are, it would do no good.


That’s like saying the schizophrenic doesn’t need to see a psychiatrist because he said so....

Then letting him go run a country.....

Do you think any individual who wants to be POTUS should have a independent psychiatric evaluation done?
edit on 8-1-2018 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
53
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join