It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: TDawg61
a reply to: tadaman
I think it's amazing how posts such as yours have become so common. You don't actually address the topic in the op whatsoever.
You just go after the author.
originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: antiantonym
That was Star’s opinion. I stated my opinion. And before you dismiss my opinion I’ll remind you that Star has one vote just as I do and at the end of the day this is all about votes.
So do you care to tell me what crime Trump is being accused of committing? If you know of one please site your source.
originally posted by: Grambler
Well fair is fair.
First the fbi needs to give a bunch of trump team members immunity.
Then they should write up statements claiming he is innocent before interviewing him.
Then allow others being investigated to sit in on the interview with him.
Then they need to get an agent that has texted his admiration for trump to do the interview.
That interview then should not be recorded.
I mean, that is the precedent, right?
originally posted by: antiantonym
originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: antiantonym
That was Star’s opinion. I stated my opinion. And before you dismiss my opinion I’ll remind you that Star has one vote just as I do and at the end of the day this is all about votes.
So do you care to tell me what crime Trump is being accused of committing? If you know of one please site your source.
Diane Feinstein: "...That's obstruction of justice."
Here's an article on the topic:
time.com...
www.youtube.com...
originally posted by: Grambler
Well fair is fair.
First the fbi needs to give a bunch of trump team members immunity.
Then they should write up statements claiming he is innocent before interviewing him.
Then allow others being investigated to sit in on the interview with him.
Then they need to get an agent that has texted his admiration for trump to do the interview.
That interview then should not be recorded.
I mean, that is the precedent, right?
It’s true that, if your argument is not clear, your opponent can not attack your position. But presenting an intentionally unclear, imprecise or cluttered argument is not the modus operandi of those honestly wanting their argument to be vetted. A subset of this fallacy is the vague insulators fallacy. The inability to respond to such an argument often leads to the argument from silence fallacy.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RadioRobert
True ...every lawyer wishes their client was mute. Every lawyer will fight like hell to keep a client from testifying.
But this isn't court. I'm not sure his lawyers can protect him if Mueller really wants to have a chat.
What was it you could not comprehend?
originally posted by: Sillyolme
originally posted by: Grambler
Well fair is fair.
First the fbi needs to give a bunch of trump team members immunity.
Then they should write up statements claiming he is innocent before interviewing him.
Then allow others being investigated to sit in on the interview with him.
Then they need to get an agent that has texted his admiration for trump to do the interview.
That interview then should not be recorded.
I mean, that is the precedent, right?
Since you all are sure that those procedures resulted in a cover up you must be saying that trump has something to cover up.