It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bigelow, UFOs, MUFON and ‘DeLonge’ Road to AATIP

page: 45
123
<< 42  43  44    46  47  48 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 05:31 AM
link   
a reply to: interupt42

Some dont
:




posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 06:21 AM
link   
a reply to: cuckooold

Yes that $100k is Tom's fees for promoting the venture on things like the Joe Rogan show. Basically he talks UFOs and aliens and things on chat shows. But the hard finances of how his company operates are far removed from anything like that.

Besides Tom's nice earner there are more outgoings listed. Approximately $600,000 to repay a loan from Our Two Dogs, Inc.



Guess who owns Two Dogs? You didn't have to blink once, never mind 182 times, to work that out did you? Yes it's Tom. A financial conjuring trick it seems. 6% interest as well. Wonder if I could do the same by moving cash to my trouser pocket from my wallet?

Then we have the confirmation that basically this is already Tom's Entertainment Business with no revenue streams or customers for anything outside of that realm. So risks are very high indeed.





In fact even a fully subscribed project will only raise $50m which wouldn't even 'buy' you a modern jet fighter off the shelf.

In the extremely unlikely situation that it does reach full subscription here is how the money would be spent.



So the plan would be to spend a huge chunk of monies raised on salaries (despite the low head count), warehousing, office space, records, books and comic books and marketing.


Approximately $16.1 million towards acquisitions or strategic partnerships in the Aerospace and Science Divisions.


I am not sure what $16.1m gets you in the Aerospace and Science fields these days. But I'd suggest that established companies have a lot more cash and much deeper resources to develop aerospace projects.

If the stock flotation only raises $30m then only $9m will be allocated for the above, reducing to $1.5m if only $5m is raised.

Finally




If the offering size were to be less than $5 million and above the $1 million minimum, TTS AAS would adjust its use of proceeds by reducing planned growth of employee headcount, reducing operational costs, and slowing down projects or not making investment in projects. The company is also required under the loan to Our Two Dogs, Inc. to repay 10% of the net proceeds from funds raised in this offering, up to $400,000 in this scenario.


So if the project doesn't raise $5m then any money invested goes to paying his 'existing' team (who 3 months into their first year have so far produced a website and a promo video that we know of). $100k goes to Tom and $400k minimum to his Two Dogs company.

The only full time employees of TTSA are Tom and Kari DeLonge, and Lisa Clifford. Jim Semivan and Hal Puthoff are listed as contractors. Luiz Elizondo and others are not listed. I assume they are casual labour resources and will be paid like gig workers.



Currently the TTSA cash counter says they've raised $2,475,096.

So in the profound words of Bon Jovi they're "...half way there. Woe Ohh!, livin' on a prayer!"




**** NOTE : If you can't read the writing in the images by expanding the size of your screen then 'right click' over them (or place your finger over them on mobile devices). You should then be given an option to view the image ****




edit on 26/1/2018 by mirageman because: ETA



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 06:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Outlier13
To anyone who would like to answer this question I would be interested in your response.

Let's assume you have neither seen a Sasquatch nor had a UFO encounter.

Which would be more plausible?

The existence of Sasquatch?

or...

The existence of extra terrestrials?



What if I'm Neil Armstrong standing on the moon and I see a Sasquatch in a space suit?



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 06:41 AM
link   
Tag so I can catch up later.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 07:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: mirageman


What if I'm Neil Armstrong standing on the moon and I see a Sasquatch in a space suit?




"That's one small step for man, one big foot for mankind"



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 10:12 AM
link   
a reply to: homerJ

Maybe they have.. maybe you got a more "pure" sighting than a lot of people.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 10:14 AM
link   
a reply to: Hyperboles

Yup.

Steam "turbo generators" heated by piles of hot rocks with fancy cladding and cooling systems.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 10:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Outlier13

You are making vast assumptions.

What about neither aliens, nor sasquatch?

We have a sample size of one in the Universe for intelligent life.

Well, if you count us as intelligent.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

A thought.

The hottest thing in UFOlogy, other than lying about RFI and Roswell,
is "Black Triangle UFOs".

Nobody.. not even full skeptics... are denying they exist.
(whatever they are).

Crickets.

But the gang here is picking at very old stuff, with no chain of
custody.. apparently rewriting history books ,etc instead.

"Don't pay any mind to this herd of elephants.. there are these dead
mice.. well maybe they were mice.. from 60 years ago.. and oh
yes.. these clearly fake pictures and lens flare things.."

It could be that a major purpose of this entire thing is to redirect
our minds away from BTUFO. That.. and find people who got fried
by BTUFO.. about the only "realish thing" striking with any
frequency lately.

Kev


edit on 26-1-2018 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 11:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: mirageman

originally posted by: Outlier13
To anyone who would like to answer this question I would be interested in your response.

Let's assume you have neither seen a Sasquatch nor had a UFO encounter.

Which would be more plausible?

The existence of Sasquatch?

or...

The existence of extra terrestrials?



What if I'm Neil Armstrong standing on the moon and I see a Sasquatch in a space suit?




Many think Sasquatch is an ET. Probably one of the ET’s hybrid beasts. They let him down from the saucer now and then to go to the bathroom just like we humans walk our dogs, and scoop him back up away from prying eyes.

Once in a while a pain in the ass hunter, who’s got no business that far out in the woods, gets a load of em and that’s why he or it is so legendary yet mysteriously elusive



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 12:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell

They should box train him like a cat.

dogs are too much trouble.

this proves that the aliens aren't advanced.. they would
have CatSquatch if they were.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

At least he doesn’t need a leash.


I know there was some ghoulish AA episode where they speculated about this.


Even old Anibis the Egyptian god was an alien hybrid creature.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Do people still see huge black triangular craft?

I can't remember the last big case featuring one since Phoenix Lights and the Sheffield UFO Incident a month or two later in the UK. That was the spring of 1997.

There again Bigelow has been hoovering up MUFON reports for years.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 02:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Willtell




Many think Sasquatch is an ET. Probably one of the ET’s hybrid beasts. They let him down from the saucer now and then to go to the bathroom


Which begs the question. "Does a Bigfoot s*it in the woods?".

If so it must be an inter dimensional one. Because we never find any evidence left behind!
edit on 26/1/2018 by mirageman because: smelling mistake



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 02:24 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

My dogs leave plenty of "evidence".



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 02:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: mirageman
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

Do people still see huge black triangular craft?

I can't remember the last big case featuring one since Phoenix Lights and the Sheffield UFO Incident a month or two later in the UK. That was the spring of 1997.

There again Bigelow has been hoovering up MUFON reports for years.


Are you serious?

I read somewhere that BTUFO is the second most reported shape to see, after
"blob of light".

This site:

www.ufostalker.com...

has a dedicated category just for BTUFO and plenty of entries.

Have you been snoozin' on your BTUFO research?

Just typing in "black triangle" gets you 1395 results:

www.ufostalker.com...

and there are numerous others with "V" shape, etc. that could
be construed to be the same thing.

As I was typing this, they got more BTUFO reports in... so I had
to increment the number.
edit on 26-1-2018 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 03:01 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

Well then that would be pretty epic. Better yet...seeing Sasquatch piloting a UFO.



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 03:16 PM
link   
a reply to: KellyPrettyBear

I don't do any triangle research! I am too busy reading about Trumpton these days.

But I am also aware that we shouldn't stray off topic either.

So in other news about the TTSA project. In case anyone missed it.

The Nimitz UFO case from 2004 was proudlay announced by Chris Mellon with a huge photo behind him, a little blurred out, as he described how the tic tac UFO was spotted.



The original photo dates back to 2005 and was taken in Manchester, UK : Link and was later proven to be a party balloon.

Note that Mellon did not claim it was an original photo of the incident either. But it seems a little deceptive to have used it.


edit on 26/1/2018 by mirageman because: added link to TTSA video



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

Duplicate, sorry.
edit on 26-1-2018 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 26 2018 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: mirageman

Duplicate, sorry.
edit on 26-1-2018 by KellyPrettyBear because: (no reason given)







 
123
<< 42  43  44    46  47  48 >>

log in

join