Trump: Wolff book 'full of lies,' author had 'zero access'

Trump, in a Thursday night tweet, implored people to look at Wolff's past and referred to his former-adviser-turned-latest-target, Steve Bannon, as "Sloppy Steve."

"I authorized Zero access to White House (actually turned him down many times) for author of phony book! I never spoke to him for book. Full of lies, misrepresentations and sources that don't exist. Look at this guy's past and watch what happens to him and Sloppy Steve!" the President tweeted.
www.cnn.com...

Does anyone still believe that the more something is denied, the more likely it is to be true? Trump has put this book on everyone's radar. Why?

Is Trump trying to use the Streisand effect to his own advantage in a 4D chess move? Or is he just a rambling old man yelling at clouds?

And "Sloppy Steve" is about as classy as Steve Bannon himself. Why does Trump have to stoop to everyone else's level to prove how far above them he is?

Too bad lots of people saw him planted there for hours and hours.

And too bad we can't believe a word trump says.

Trump says... that's a joke...

a reply to: antiantonym

And what a surprise trump is trying to discredit someone who said something negative about him.

a reply to: antiantonym


TIP:

Have you noticed that very few special characters appear in your Subject/Title line in the listing of threads. Instead of the ":", it's easier on readers eyes if you type "Trump Says Wolff Book is Full of Lies. Author Had No Access".

originally posted by: Sillyolme
Too bad lots of people saw him planted there for hours and hours.

And too bad we can't believe a word trump says.

Trump says... that's a joke...

Not feeling well tonight, SillyOlMe?

Whether Trump is behind this or not it is definitely going to help validate how unfounded most claims against Trump truly are. He will always be able to point back at this hack job of a book as an example of how desperate the media is to report on anything that slanders Trump.

Does Wolff even exist
or is it just a 'sly' pen name?

originally posted by: antiantonym

Trump, in a Thursday night tweet, implored people to look at Wolff's past and referred to his former-adviser-turned-latest-target, Steve Bannon, as "Sloppy Steve."

"I authorized Zero access to White House (actually turned him down many times) for author of phony book! I never spoke to him for book. Full of lies, misrepresentations and sources that don't exist. Look at this guy's past and watch what happens to him and Sloppy Steve!" the President tweeted.
www.cnn.com...

Does anyone still believe that the more something is denied, the more likely it is to be true? Trump has put this book on everyone's radar. Why?

Is Trump trying to use the Streisand effect to his own advantage in a 4D chess move? Or is he just a rambling old man yelling at clouds?

And "Sloppy Steve" is about as classy as Sloppy Steve himself. Why does Trump have to stoop to everyone else's level to prove how far above them he is?

Apparently Wolff has tapes of at least some of this.

And no, Trump isn't playing 4D chess. The behavior you see, including the name-calling, is something he's done all his life. He has a very long history of trying to prove himself better by belittling people, and a long history of being unable to look beyond a person's wealth to see if they're people of integrity.

300 days in office isn't enough to change him.

originally posted by: Planette
Does Wolff even exist
or is it just a 'sly' pen name?

He's got a Wikipedia page, he's got other books out, and he's a known quantity. That's no pen name.

Don't you already have a thread about Trump and the book, why start another useless thread?

a reply to: antiantonym

Based on the book he probably tweeted that behind a locked door in his bedroom eating cheeseburgers while watching TV.

a reply to: antiantonym

Just a question, OP.

Do you believe everything that's reportedly in the book?

originally posted by: thesaneone
Don't you already have a thread about Trump and the book, why start another useless thread?

We're watching probably the biggest meltdown of a U.S. federal administration since Nixon. We should be discussing these details because it's history in the making. This is essential conspiracy content for now and all time.

This meltdown will go down in history, it will be discussed and dissected until the U.S. no longer exists, and it could be the most significant conspiracy-related news of our lifetimes.

This is essential stuff.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: antiantonym

Just a question, OP.

Do you believe everything that's reportedly in the book?

If someone else says something about Trump it's true, if Trump says anything then it has to be false.

I thought you knew this?

originally posted by: antiantonym

originally posted by: thesaneone
Don't you already have a thread about Trump and the book, why start another useless thread?

We're watching probably the biggest meltdown of a U.S. federal administration since Nixon. We should be discussing these details because it's history in the making. This is essential conspiracy content for now and all time.

This meltdown will go down in history, it will be discussed and dissected until the U.S. no longer exists, and it could be the most significant conspiracy-related news of our lifetimes.

This is essential stuff.

The only meltdown I see is from you guys.

a reply to: thesaneone


Isn't this a classical example of confirmation bias?

a reply to: antiantonym

This is essential stuff.

🤔

No it's not, its national enquirer on steroids.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: thesaneone


Isn't this a classical example of confirmation bias?

And TDS.

a reply to: thesaneone


I prefer the term;

Trump
Unhinged
Regressive
Demonstrators

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: thesaneone


I prefer the term;

Trump
Unhinged
Regressive
Demonstrators

Nice one.