It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Perfectenemy
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: xuenchen
Hillary's reaction to the new opening of Pandora's Box
She in big trouble again
Hillary will have to develop a new disease, to garner empathy. Let's see...she's already used The Flu, Pneumonia, Gout, Mental Lapse... What's next?
What i never want to see is her coming out as a lesbian and the videotape with Huma to proof it. I would gauge my eyes out immediately after. All that leather and i don't mean leather clothing.
Second, the FBI also confirmed that a “key witness” in the case provided false statements to agents. That witness is the same person who deleted an archive of Clinton’s emails in 2015 after Congress had subpoenaed them.
FBI documents revealed to The Hill had the witnesses’ name redacted, but based on public reports, that man is Paul Combetta, who worked for Platte River Networks, an IT support company based in Colorado, according to the New York Times.
He told the FBI in May 2016 he deleted Clinton’s emails at the request of Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s lawyer and former chief of staff, The Hill reported.
Combetta was never charged with lying to the FBI, a federal felony. Instead, the FBI granted him immunity so he could correct his story. Meanwhile, several former Trump campaign officials have pled guilty to the same crime.
Judicial Watch: At Least 18 Classified Emails Found on Weiner’s Laptop
originally posted by: Skyfloating
What happened today:
1. Investigation into Clinton Foundation
2. Fusion GPS to turn over bank records
3. Clinton email investigation re-opened
4. Clintons House on Fire
5. Fire and Fury Book
6. Bannon Trump fake Feud
7. Comey Memo Revealed
8. DOJ Docs turned over to Nunes
9. Assange possible Pardon
Coincidence?
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: carewemust
It's treasonous how the MSM reports in my opinion.
Changing the language from extremely negligent in order to dodge a prosecution (as it was a clear violation of the law) is what will put Comey behind the eight ball.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: carewemust
It's treasonous how the MSM reports in my opinion.
Changing the language from extremely negligent in order to dodge a prosecution (as it was a clear violation of the law) is what will put Comey behind the eight ball.
I read that Comey used the term grossly negligent five times in his original memo, and all five instances were removed, making it 100% clear that the FBI staff working on the case were specifically removing language contained in the actual law in order to water down the statement.
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: carewemust
It's treasonous how the MSM reports in my opinion.
Changing the language from extremely negligent in order to dodge a prosecution (as it was a clear violation of the law) is what will put Comey behind the eight ball.
I read that Comey used the term grossly negligent five times in his original memo, and all five instances were removed, making it 100% clear that the FBI staff working on the case were specifically removing language contained in the actual law in order to water down the statement.
It's crazy for the head of the FBI to personally write a letter, and then pass it down to subordinates for proof-reading, cleanup and sanitizing.
Is the reopening of this case merely to get Comey, or is there likelihood that Hillary will be correctly deemed a Grossly Negligent lawbreaker this time..And face the appropriate prosecution?
originally posted by: MOMof3
Ain’t it amazing how republicans can spend spend and not a word from the deficit hawks. Good times when repubs are in charge.
It's crazy for the head of the FBI to personally write a letter, and then pass it down to subordinates for proof-reading, cleanup and sanitizing.
This will be an unusual statement in at least a couple ways. First, I am going to include more detail about our process than I ordinarily would, because I think the American people deserve those details in a case of intense public interest. Second, I have not coordinated or reviewed this statement in any way with the Department of Justice or any other part of the government. They do not know what I am about to say.