It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It appears, the State Department was receiving email updates from the New York Times to let them know what would be published DAYS before the stories were actually released!
Wikileaks tweeted:
“New cable shows New York Times “reporter” Scott Shane handed over Cablegate’s secret country by country publication schedule to the US government giving the State Department (then headed by Hillary Clinton) up to a week in advance to spin the revelations or create diversions.”
Basically, what the tweet means is that Hillary Clinton was receiving the news BEFORE it was released to the public. This would give her time then to manipulate the public with her own ‘spin’. Clearly, this is collusion between the failing New York Times and former State Department under Hillary. Solid proof and evidence.
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
WL is evidence. JA is now in protective custody. He was removed from the embassy on Christmas day and is now on his way or in the USA.
According to Alex Constantine (Mockingbird: The Subversion Of The Free Press By The CIA), in the 1950s, "some 3,000 salaried and contract CIA employees were eventually engaged in propaganda efforts". Wisner was also able to restrict newspapers from reporting about certain events. For example, the CIA plots to overthrow the governments of Iran and Guatemala.
A few years ago I had the pleasure of meeting Arthur Sulzberger, Jr. and Bill Keller at The New York Times building on Manhattan. Keller was the long time editor in chief of the newspaper and Sulzberger its proprietor. We met at what must have been the 50th floor of the company headquarters, on 8th Avenue. I write company headquarters, instead of newspaper, because this part of the building was accessible only through a separate elevator-system and was strictly off-limits for the regular New York Times reporters.
We spoke for about an hour and a half for the film Mediastan that I was shooting at the time, and now in hindsight, I’m both grateful and surprised by how honestly the administrative and real heads of the enterprise described the nature of their work. Grateful, because the degree of openness they exhibited is a rarity in the backrooms of journalism. Surprised, because what they were doing wasn’t journalism, at least not in the sense that I had been taught in journalism school in Sweden. No, the work that Keller and Sulzberger were describing was something entirely different, and as such it was a shame that this part of the building was off-limits to the journalists of their own newspaper. Because, as I would soon realize, the upper levels of the New York Times building was a place where a variety of important political decisions were negotiated and taken. A space, ironically, very far from scrutiny of the public eye.
Wouldn't surprise me. There has to be a reason his account was taken down for a few hours and then brought back online with no explanation. Add to that the Navy tweeting his name. It's a crazy timeline we are in right now.
originally posted by: purplemer
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
WL is evidence. JA is now in protective custody. He was removed from the embassy on Christmas day and is now on his way or in the USA.
Wouldn't surprise me. There has to be a reason his account was taken down for a few hours and then brought back online with no explanation. Add to that the Navy tweeting his name. It's a crazy timeline we are in right now.
It appears, the State Department was receiving email updates from the New York Times to let them know what would be published DAYS before the stories were actually released!
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
I'd say I don't care which is a little different.