It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Anti-sharia laws proliferate as Trump strikes hostile tone toward Muslims

page: 3
14
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:22 PM
link   
a reply to: sdcigarpig

Thank you.

And, as I said, I am far more concerned with Dominionism.




posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:24 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Nothing bigoted about that.

Tolerant Right.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: neo96

Nothing bigoted about that.

Tolerant Right.


There sure wasn't.

READ it again.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:44 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

So tell me, Mr. Tolerant Right, if all things were equal, what in the hell are you talking about? Whose the victim here, in your eyes if all things were equal?



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:24 PM
link   
a reply to: DrStevenBrule

But there is already an attempt that has been active to push and promote a religious law. Same principle, though a bit more restrictive and far more dangerous, and that is the Christian version. Now if the Christians can push and promote their own version, why not any other religious groups out there.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:25 PM
link   
I found this thread.... just after I found a News Blurb to add in my signature

an apt topic to announce that rumor-has-it that Trump will make room in Gitmo (on Cuba soil) to house the convicted in the Deep-State Swamp Draining Operation...

taking over territory/lands in the USA which are under the protection of Constitution Law is itself an act of Sedition, if not War....this would include Muslim NO-GO Zones where the Constitution Rule of Law is supplanted by Sharia doctrines...
Completely Illegal and creates the Denial of Human Rights to any citizen who even accidently steps foot in that Zone


read the Signature line at bottom of post, tyvm
edit on th31151469435130252017 by St Udio because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:56 PM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Feel free to point out were


brutal barbarism practices

supersede the existing law in the U.S.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 11:35 PM
link   
Sharia law requires women wear full face veil. Sharia law requires the rich give money to the poor. Called zakat. America would never accept such laws.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 11:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: afatos
Sharia law requires women wear full face veil. Sharia law requires the rich give money to the poor. Called zakat. America would never accept such laws.






That won't stop chicken little and Co running around in circles and freaking out though.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 12:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: afatos
Sharia law requires women wear full face veil. Sharia law requires the rich give money to the poor. Called zakat. America would never accept such laws.


Got news for you.

Not even all Muslims agree on the veil.


The Face Veil in Islamic Law

There is much confusion and dispute even among Muslims about the status of the niqab (face veil) in Islamic law. There are some Muslims who reject it vigorously but they agree with the headscarf. There are other Muslims who accept it while feeling that it is an extra thing and a recommended act but not obligatory. And there are also Muslims who assert that it is the required form of modest dress for women. This last group are very vocal and thus get more attention that their numbers would otherwise suggest.


www.muhajabah.com...



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 12:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: antiantonym
a reply to: Annee

You're using the appeal to tradition logical fallacy.

I don't know how you can forget all the children who are victims of Sharia law. What about the girls who are 'sold' (or otherwise forced or pressured) into marriage? Do they get to choose what law they will follow?

They probably can't even comprehend what that choice entails.

Their parents won't give them a choice regardless.


In the US there are Christian sects who arrange and force marriages.

And there are Muslims who are free to choose.

Extremism is not exclusive to one belief over another.

Extremism is extremism.


And adding more Extremism is the solution? Listen to yourself!



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 12:37 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3daysgone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: antiantonym
a reply to: Annee

You're using the appeal to tradition logical fallacy.

I don't know how you can forget all the children who are victims of Sharia law. What about the girls who are 'sold' (or otherwise forced or pressured) into marriage? Do they get to choose what law they will follow?

They probably can't even comprehend what that choice entails.

Their parents won't give them a choice regardless.


In the US there are Christian sects who arrange and force marriages.

And there are Muslims who are free to choose.

Extremism is not exclusive to one belief over another.

Extremism is extremism.


And adding more Extremism is the solution? Listen to yourself!


Why don't you re-read what you're referring to.

All of it.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 12:52 AM
link   

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: 3daysgone

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: antiantonym
a reply to: Annee

You're using the appeal to tradition logical fallacy.

I don't know how you can forget all the children who are victims of Sharia law. What about the girls who are 'sold' (or otherwise forced or pressured) into marriage? Do they get to choose what law they will follow?

They probably can't even comprehend what that choice entails.

Their parents won't give them a choice regardless.


In the US there are Christian sects who arrange and force marriages.

And there are Muslims who are free to choose.

Extremism is not exclusive to one belief over another.

Extremism is extremism.


And adding more Extremism is the solution? Listen to yourself!


Why don't you re-read what you're referring to.

All of it.


I would rather you answer the question instead of avoiding it. Is it better to add more extremism?



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 01:47 AM
link   
Good. Anything that outlaws stoning for unlawful sex, apostasy and drinking alcohol are fine by me.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 01:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Good. Anything that outlaws stoning for unlawful sex, apostasy and drinking alcohol are fine by me.






Who are you to dictate to other people from other countries what they can and cannot do?



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 01:56 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Didn't realise stoning for unlawful sex was previously lawful here
thank god they made a new law.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 01:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Good. Anything that outlaws stoning for unlawful sex, apostasy and drinking alcohol are fine by me.



Who are you to dictate to other people from other countries what they can and cannot do?


You wouldn’t protest again someone getting stoned for apostasy? Who are you to not speak up in the face of injustice?



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 02:00 AM
link   

originally posted by: vonclod
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Didn't realise stoning for unlawful sex was previously lawful here
thank god they made a new law.


Allah made the laws fixed in Sharia, and you don’t mind it in your country.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 02:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope

originally posted by: hopenotfeariswhatweneed

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Good. Anything that outlaws stoning for unlawful sex, apostasy and drinking alcohol are fine by me.



Who are you to dictate to other people from other countries what they can and cannot do?


You wouldn’t protest again someone getting stoned for apostasy? Who are you to not speak up in the face of injustice?






Careful now, you live in the land of cops that shoot first and ask questions later.

If I lived in a country that happened yes I would question it, however I do not and it's not my place to dictate to others that live in their countries how they should live.... Right?



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 02:04 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

It's not in my country..which is probably same as yours, in any case I have noticed any stoneings lately..or ever.



new topics




 
14
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join