It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: intrptr
yes
originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: intrptr
what about alternate realities?
originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: intrptr
fast speed is an common feature in ufo sightings
originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: makalit
hahah so funny
what you dint see is that the case was investigated by the fsr team, the witness was an reliable woman who almost never lied, and there was an strange landing mark at the scene!
originally posted by: Kalixi
Back on topic now
That's such a weird story. I wonder if she could have had some sort of hallucination or gas leak that caused the dog to faint and her to get high or something
I'd like to know why humanoid encounters are always seen in groups of three?
S+F
originally posted by: humanoidlord
a reply to: intrptr
hmmm
so this is why they look transpararent correct?
this story seems like it was marketed like a Dr Zeus tale for a 3 year old.
There's no point in breaking it down because anyone who took it seriously already threw all rationality out the door.
It's funny, what you see in the world such as "deluded" (for example) is usually something you are experiencing and going through. It's the universe reflecting back to you what you are reflecting outside of yourself, a kind of bounce. It's because a human can be going through 1 of billions of sensations, feelings, and to 'see' deluded people, or 'sad' or 'happy' people, is just the higher laws of attraction that you are experiencing and reflecting outwards.
If you break it down 1) Wings would have to be much larger to support that physical body
2) A giant orange sphere materialized. Where have we seen this before? Oh yeah, never. It's never been documented, proven, or filmed, at least to be released in public, that anything like that has ever happened. But why not believe her and go with her word. Like Atomic above said, if we use that logic in court, serial killers never killed their victims either, even though theirs countless evidence they did. If you just use heresay as your personal evidence and not the things you can trust that are always 100% sound, like videos, etc, then your conclusions won't be 100% sound.
3) They spent enough time in this 'reality' to learn english, yet they weren't educated enough to know about a lit cigarettes not being harmful to them.
4) She floated through the air, another thing no one has ever documented or proved someone doing.