It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NYT Bombsell: Papadopoulos not Dossier Behind FBI Launching Investigation

page: 6
22
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:21 AM
link   
a reply to: proteus33

What crimes were revealed by the stolen emails? You must know. You put it out there. Surely you know what crimes. Surely you can point out the specific emails that show such criminal activity?
Or is this just an echo?
edit on 122018 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)




posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:22 AM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

So does this mean George Papadopoulos was used to get the FISA warrants?



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:23 AM
link   

Attention!!!
This is NOT the Mud Pit!!!


All rules for polite political debate will be enforced.
Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (REVISED)

You are responsible for your own posts.....those who ignore that responsibility will face mod actions.


and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: butcherguy

These were the DNC emails. No one has ANY Hillary emails. So sorry charlie.



I wouldn't be quite so sure...she used her blackberry in foreign countries, which means it was compromised within minutes of her being in country.

Many countries had direct knowledge of her private server before anyone else.


There is a 99.999% probability that it was accessed by foreign powers.

Just because no one has released them doesn't mean they don't have them.

If the FBI doesn't allow their hardened blackberry's in certain countries because they are so easily compromised, a COTS (commercial off the shelf) blackberry wouldn't stand a chance.
edit on R352018-01-02T09:35:45-06:00k351Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:25 AM
link   
a reply to: xenon129

The COUNTRY already has all the proof it needs. Some folks have understanding issues.
This is not a Democrat thing much as the tang king would have you believe.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:27 AM
link   
...And buried deep at the end of the article

"Besides the information from the Australians, the investigation was also propelled by intelligence from other friendly governments, including the British and Dutch. A trip to Moscow by another adviser, Carter Page, also raised concerns at the F.B.I."

Hysterical that they managed to squeeze Carter Page into the story. considering it was PAGE that the NYT breathlessly published this article last April...

NYT Carter Page


a reply to: theantediluvian



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:35 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Australia reported the incident as soon as wikileaks released the emails. What could they say before that? Hey we had this conversation in a bar and...
Saint Peter could give them the info and if it implicates trump you guys would question it's credibility. Trump has taught you all so well how to obfuscate and distract to change a conversation.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:39 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

Ha ha. How did the drunk guy know about the hacked emails two months before wiki released them? Maybe because the whole team knew?



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Konduit

No too bad the FBI took the word of crowdstrike instead of actually asking for the servers.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: amfirst1

Bull#.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:49 AM
link   
a reply to: SouthernForkway26

This doesn't dispute that the dossier is being used it just shows it was not the only catalyst for opening an investigation.
There certainly is enough info in the dossier itself to raise suspicions.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:52 AM
link   
Look at this thread here: www.abovetopsecret.com...

In it, there is sufficient evidence and detail brought up regarding New York Times, and the fact that they are nothing more than a propaganda wing to push certain narratives to the public. I also notice that everything is still being referred to as the "DNC Hack", which we know is a falsity in itself..... Casting further doubt into their "Journalism".

All the Russian probe has done is pull up ties and collusion between the DNC, and brought up several of their skeletons.

How long did you think it was going to take before the Democratic Times started pushing a story to try and cover their Masters' asses?

At this point, it's all about damage control.... Get ready for all sorts of "new information" coming to light (courtesy of CNN and NYT) about things that happened months/years ago that can't, and never will, be confirmed.
edit on 2-1-2018 by dothedew because: (no reason given)

edit on 2-1-2018 by dothedew because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 09:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Xcathdra

Your assumption veers completely off course because your starting point is that the information in the dossier is fake. You cannot get a correct answer when your measuring stick is broken.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 10:04 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth




 a DNC campaign document created in collusion with the Kremlin


Wow what an evolution the dossier has gone through. This is pathetically ill informed. No wonder you come to the conclusions you do. Did you do that yourself or did you pick that up somewhere else? This is the story trump is presenting isn't it?. Lol...



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme


No one has ANY Hillary emails.


Really?

Then what is this about?




posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 10:08 AM
link   
a reply to: RickinVa

Uh huh. I am quite sure. Know why? Because anyone who had them would have put them out there by now.
Why hold on to them for six years?
No one has her emails. Guess private servers are good for something.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 10:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa

Uh huh. I am quite sure. Know why? Because anyone who had them would have put them out there by now.
Why hold on to them for six years?
No one has her emails. Guess private servers are good for something.


Actually Datto had them and turned them over to the FBI. I made a very long thread on this stuff a long time ago where the FBI even references having them in a warrant.

Also goes back to Hillary's emails and the BES used by her in the UK being owned by the Saudis...so it's likely they had quite a few and quite possibly the reason behind the recent Saudi purge once they realized the level of corruption....



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Sillyolme


No one has ANY Hillary emails.


Really?

Then what is this about?



LOL....really just LOL. It's like some people just make up a story in their head and stick to it regardless of truth. It's honestly really hard to watch.



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 10:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: RickinVa

Uh huh. I am quite sure. Know why? Because anyone who had them would have put them out there by now.
Why hold on to them for six years?
No one has her emails. Guess private servers are good for something.


Why would China or Israel release them? What would they have to gain?

Because no one has released them is your only proof that her server wasn't hacked when it was completely open on the internet?


Her server was hacked, there is no doubt about it,,, at least to anyone in the spying business.

A blackberry can be accessed from 1,000 yards away and all the information on it, including the IP address of the email server it is tethered to.
edit on R262018-01-02T10:26:38-06:00k261Vam by RickinVa because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 2 2018 @ 10:23 AM
link   
Here is my thread on the Clinton BB IP stuff....very interesting when looking at recent events!

BlackBerry Clinton emails Saudis




top topics



 
22
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join