It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Incoherent, authoritarian, uninformed: Trump’s New York Times interview is a scary read

page: 4
28
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 08:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

That is a lot of opinion. The only one im concerned with is your belief that the FBI hadnt already blown their credibility when they started executing entrapment plots on mentally retarded muslim boys.




posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 08:38 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy

So is the just not Clinton angle.
You guys should have voted more for Johnson sod who got the 2016 election you could have built on getting a better 3rd party who are not democrat nor republican.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 08:43 AM
link   
a reply to: testingtesting

The difference between Trump and Johnson:

- Trump says insensitive things and is just full of snip

- Johnson says really scary and often dumb things


Id vote Libertarian if a decent libertarian stepped up. Johnson aint him.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 08:47 AM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

But if he had gotten more of the vote it would have been a better platform for the next election.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:04 AM
link   
I have spent a good deal of time formulating a well thought out and eloquent response to the OP. This response, in keeping with the hard-hitting research and quality journalistic approach of the OP, is intended to address, on a point by point basis, the stunning revelations outlined by the OP on both an intellectual and professional level.

So, without further delay, I offer said response:



"NANNER, NANNER, NANNER, NANNER....NANNER!!!" *sticks tongue out*

That is all.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:26 AM
link   

originally posted by: testingtesting
a reply to: DBCowboy

So is the just not Clinton angle.
You guys should have voted more for Johnson sod who got the 2016 election you could have built on getting a better 3rd party who are not democrat nor republican.


Johnson was a globalist pretending to be a libertarian.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
She's a war criminal traitor


And once Republicans can figure how to assign a special prosecutor to the case she will be indicted!

It's too bad the Republicans are so incompetent with our government.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:44 AM
link   

originally posted by: testingtesting
Wow it really is becoming a cult.


A lot of people have a picture of President Trump hanging up in their house. What's wrong with being patriotic?



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:45 AM
link   
a reply to: dfnj2015

I'm not counting on anything to happen to her or anyone else on that whole front. Not without our help.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:48 AM
link   

Trump: “I have absolute right to do what I want to do with the Justice Department”


Wrong.

Only within the scope of US law and the Constitution.

"Absolute right" is the dangerous terminology people are failing to understand: it's autocratic.


edit on 30-12-2017 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:30 AM
link   
So, op, what did you think draining the swamp was going to look like?



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
I have spent a good deal of time formulating a well thought out and eloquent response to the OP. This response, in keeping with the hard-hitting research and quality journalistic approach of the OP, is intended to address, on a point by point basis, the stunning revelations outlined by the OP on both an intellectual and professional level.

So, without further delay, I offer said response:



"NANNER, NANNER, NANNER, NANNER....NANNER!!!" *sticks tongue out*

That is all.

Brilliant assessment! Well done sticking with the facts. Thumbs up!



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:31 AM
link   

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
I have spent a good deal of time formulating a well thought out and eloquent response to the OP. This response, in keeping with the hard-hitting research and quality journalistic approach of the OP, is intended to address, on a point by point basis, the stunning revelations outlined by the OP on both an intellectual and professional level.

So, without further delay, I offer said response:



"NANNER, NANNER, NANNER, NANNER....NANNER!!!" *sticks tongue out*

That is all.

Brilliant assessment! Well done sticking with the facts. Thumbs up!



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: antiantonym

originally posted by: testingtesting
Wow it really is becoming a cult.


... it won't help them in the 2018 midterm elections, and it won't help them in the 2020 elections. Politics is about the future not the past.



Be careful with such predictions. There are quite a few who embarrassed themselves with their assured predictions to the extent they had to run away after the Nov 2016 election.

Plenty of time before the 2018 elections, never mind 2020. Let's see how it plays out. You are helping Trump though, in case you didn't realise it. Every time one these inconsequential butt-hurt threads get posted by people who can't keep their emotional responses in check whenever Trump says anything, it makes Trump supporters more determined and moderates less likely to side with the anti-Trumpers.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 10:42 AM
link   
a reply to: antiantonym

Both Trump and Hilary belong behind bars



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 11:02 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

lol

If politics is about the "future" it is only because some politicians have a piss-poor past.




posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 11:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: DBCowboy
I have to ask, what is the left going to run on in 2018, 2020, etc?

Is it going to be higher taxes and open borders?

I'm asking the hard-core anti-Trump people.

What platform are you going to run on that will contrast with Trump?


I think they will run on the "Trump cut medicaid and medicare" ticket.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 12:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: projectvxn
Wait, don't they fall under the Judicial branch I thought??


No. The DOJ is an executive branch department.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

How quickly we forget that, eh?

The suspicions about the FBI, and CIA (coc aine in America, anyone??) predate Trump by decades... But that's conveniently forgotten by some...apparently.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan

Agreed. 'course I voted independent last election, and my guy didn't even raise a flicker...
Hopefully, they've woke to the fact that Johnson is more of a detriment, than a help.




top topics



 
28
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join