It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

White Genocide Professors Play the Victim

page: 8
33
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:33 AM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

You have the wrong country,if its the white patriarchy + prison industrial complex you talking about.We have been under ANC rule since 1994.In my country,it is a case of a black government and black judiciary sending down black convicts,and of course convicts of any ethnicity.You need to burn that forest on your shoulder,or in time,it Shall burn You.




posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 09:47 AM
link   
I'm still trying to figure out why the Left calls the opposition Nazis.
They were the National Socialist Workers Party after all.
How can we have Socialist on both the far right and far left?

I think the takeover of the University system is pretty blatant.
All their touting of diversity is meaningless drivel when they shut out not only certain viewpoints but promote wholesale the destruction of entire races.
White students and their parents money is welcome of course.
They will need to be quiet in the back of the room however.
Academic freedom has become a farce, starting at the home of the free speech movement - Berkeley.
How's that for irony?



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 12:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Grambler


Ill also point out that the rhetoric accompanying the Nazi version of what you accuse is indefensible on its own. The rhetoric accompanying the professor, however, is pretty easily defended (for the most part...remember, he's still angry about injustice).


Absurd.

Absolutely disgusting.

No, his rhetoric about killing all white people is not easily defended, even if you think it is hyperbolic.

What makes white people more evil than blacks that makes his rhetoric more defensible?


Obviously you didn't understand what i said.

Or you are just hell bent on creating a race flame.

I cannot, and will not, agree that a black man making an empassioned plea for equality within his nation is anything remotely similar to Nazi's spouting pure hate based only in hate.

In fact, i'd say that such a comparison is what is actually disgusting.


Ok I think I get what you're saying but I think you might be missing what the others are trying to say because they are using examples that don't quite fit.
Ok so here we have two professors (one black and one white) from two different university's both calling for the death of white people. That's the basics correct?

Ok so here goes.

In this scenario we have two professors from two university's again one black and one white, both calling for the death of all black people because you know, black commit most of the violent crimes in the US, so obviously getting rid of them will solve most of the violent crime... is that right? is it just Hyperbolic? No it would be considered racism, and they would likely be charged with not only hate crimes but trying to incite others to commit hate crimes by spouting their vitriol.

Ok how about this one. You have two average students, one black and one white. Both have grown up in harsh conditions, both had a drunken/drug addicted abusive parent, another who worked two jobs to support the family. Both obviously live in a ghetto as their providing parent can't afford to move them to a better school district. So would it be ok for them to call for the death of a certain race? Even if they personally feel justified in doing so because they believe that the other race was the bane of their existence? the force keeping them down?

What about the white kid who grows up in a ghetto, get harassed and picked on everyday at school for being the only white kid. Who is scared to leave their own house at night because of gang bangers and drug pushers.... are they justified if they start spouting that there is a need to kill all of only one race... I mean they had it pretty hard in life, so it must be ok.... right?

The answer to all the above should be obvious to anyone, no. Let me say it again NO! Racism no matter who it's directed at or how it's worded needs to end. There is no reasonable defense for someone who uses such speech or hold to such thoughts.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: Theprodicalson

The weakness lies in the mind that is so concrete that it cannnot see hyperbole for what it is.

What other parts of your life do you interpret so literally?

And since when did words become action? People say all sorts of crazy things. But do they DO those things?

There are threats, then there are credible threats. This case has neither. All it has is a professor who is morose enough to thing extreme words will help. All it seems to be doing is help me identify people who think in concrete terms.


Hyperbole is irrelevant. Its still encouraging genocide which is repugnant.

Even if this professor is using hyperbole , many of his loony followers could take it literally.

When you have places like south Africa teetering on the edge of genocide, idiots talking like this is dangerous.


Plus it does nothing to help solve the problem of racial tensions and racism, all it does is inflame and divide further as normal people like me are alienated and repulsed by such reprehensible talk.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: looneylupinsrevenge

Well said.

That is my point.

I can listen to people that hate a certain rave, and have a discussion.

But there is no room at all for calling for deaths of people based only on their skin color.

And it's not more defendsible for someone to say that about on race as opposed to another



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 02:29 PM
link   
Typical liberal philosophy...
Kick a bee hive till you get stung.
Then play the victim when you get called out for being a racist pos. I love the first amendment for this very reason.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 02:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Let's be real this squirrely looking man child wouldn't bust a grape in a food fight..

Come and take it betaballs.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 04:13 PM
link   
Funny how the same people that cried over white supremacists' right to free speech being denied are suddenly cheering on a professor being forced to leave his position due to death threats stemming from trolling.

Also funny is many of these same people also excuse many of the President's more ridiculous comments as trolling.

Hypocrisy Thy Name Is ATS!



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 04:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Who is saying this man doesn't have the right to say this?

He can speak, we can call out His racist comments.

Same with white supremacists.

Calling for white genocide or saying scalise should have been left to die should be called out.

Tell me when trump said something worse than calling for the death of an entire race.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

When did I mention Trump? I was referring to people like Spencer. Last time I checked you defended his and his ilks right to free speech and decried the counter protestors in Charlottesville.

How is this professor being run out of his job due to death threats any different?



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 06:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcalibur254
a reply to: Grambler

When did I mention Trump? I was referring to people like Spencer. Last time I checked you defended his and his ilks right to free speech and decried the counter protestors in Charlottesville.

How is this professor being run out of his job due to death threats any different?


Oh. When you said "Also funny is many of these same people also excuse many of the President's more ridiculous comments as trolling."

I didnt know you meant the President Richard Spencer.

And the threats to thiss professor were as bad as his comments and also should be denounced.

He was not fired, he quit.

I think anyone that makes even such a racist disgusting comment as this guy should not be fired but given a chance to apologize.

He did not and continues to [post racist things, so perhaps its better he be let go.

But again, he left voluntarily.



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 07:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254




due to death threats


Not so fast? It's worse, there is no death threat.

The phrase "All I want for Christmas is a White Genocide" offers a few pitfalls. I like the slight connotation on a "humble" Christmas wish, the invisible Christmas tree of biblical proportions in the midst of our virtual room. How can one issue any threats with a mere wish addressed to a person that doesn't really exist to deliver the present?

And who am I to think that there would be no Santa on Twitter this season! @TheREALSanta?!? WTF is wrong with the Twitter trolls? Ok, took me a second look as well, I'll give em that.

Any updates on my favorite Christmas wish yet?

edit on 30-12-2017 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 07:36 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

He was trolling. There are many on here that argue Trump is trolling when he makes dumb comments on Twitter. That's not the important part though.

The important part is that people on this board, you included, have defended people like Richard Spencer. People who have advocated for white supremacy. When protests force them their scheduled events the cry about the 1st Amendment goes up. They weren't forced to not speak. They chose to not speak because thru perceived their safety was at risk.

How is that situation any different than what this professor is going through?



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 07:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

It's different because Richard Spencer is trying to speak on public and is shut down or physically kept from speaking or attacked.

No one stopped this professor at all.

It would be like if Richard Spencer had a job, tweeted to kill all black people, then chose to quit his job because he got threats.

And then cnn did an expose on how they felt bad for Richard Spencer.

Then someone like you would have said that was ridiculous.

And I would have agreed



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 08:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

At this point Spencer's job is to give hate filled speeches. Sometimes he is prevented from doing this job due to safety reasons.

In other words he voluntarily chooses not to do his job (also known as quitting) temporarily due to perceived threats of violence.

It's a very similar situation. So why is the hate speech of one person worth defending while the hate speech of another does not?



posted on Dec, 30 2017 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Xcalibur254

Again you are missing the point.

I am defending this professors hate speech.

Who is saying that?

I defend Richards right to speak. But call his speech disgusting.

Same wit the professor.

I condemn anyone thraeteming neither Spencer or the professor.

I don't care the professor chose to quit his job.

I find it ridiculous cnn is making him out to be a victim, which they wouldn't dare do with Spencer



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 01:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Raxoxane

Ashes over my head, but most of the ATSliens in this very thread are from that exceptional nation with exceptionally emotional response provoking Tweet exports.

You guys in South Africa have been so heavily underfunded over decades that it would be a miracle not to have you wrapped in a tight net of corruption and corporate investments already. There is your globalised white patriarchy again btw.



You need to burn that forest on your shoulder,or in time,it Shall burn You.


Never came across that phrase before, GMO seed commercial or user instructions for gardening with glyphosate? Could be both. And more.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 06:03 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion




Calling for a white genocide is precisely what you'd do after walking a mile in their shoes as well. Cut 'em some slack and get your whining act together? 



What a horribly disgusting worldview you have. You are actually making excuses for them? For genocide?




Who said it's based merely on their skin colour and not on a history of bad decision making, exploitation and murder in the name of profits and/or politics? 


I didn't realize I did all that. I guess you have a point then. I know I have a drinking problem, ok? I know this. But I had no idea the extent of it! I swear!

I Never wanted to go out for a night of fun, only to black out and wake up to find out that, once again, I went and had one drink too many and the next thing you know I've gone ahead and subjugated an entire group of people...

My great grandfather had a similar Hangover experience after he lost a card game to his landlord. I can't say too much about it, but, it led to the creation of Isreal...

Look, all I can say is I'm very, very sorry, and I'm getting help so this doesn't happen again. People just really need to stop listening to me when I'm drunk. The troll in me takes over, and I can't be held responsible for Every single time that an army of misfits forms behind me and my drunken diatribes. I'll own up to my part, but, I'm clearly not the Only one with a problem here.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 06:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: Asktheanimals
I'm still trying to figure out why the Left calls the opposition Nazis.
They were the National Socialist Workers Party after all.
How can we have Socialist on both the far right and far left?

I think the takeover of the University system is pretty blatant.
All their touting of diversity is meaningless drivel when they shut out not only certain viewpoints but promote wholesale the destruction of entire races.
White students and their parents money is welcome of course.
They will need to be quiet in the back of the room however.
Academic freedom has become a farce, starting at the home of the free speech movement - Berkeley.
How's that for irony?


That's easy. Reality, for them, is just a minor obstacle which can be readily ignored. The wave of emotion they ride carries them right on past all those slight inconveniences and into Fantasy Land.



posted on Dec, 31 2017 @ 07:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: muzzleflash
a reply to: PublicOpinion

Omg you just defended calls for genocide.

Holy crap


Just another day for the morally superior people like him.

It is now defensible to call for the genocide of a race, and suggesting that it is wrong is just whining.

But people in this group have also called for white people to be kicked out of africa or killed, and called all trump supporters fascists would need to have war waged against them and be killed.

But remember, they are all about peace and love.

But thats ok, I will not sink to calling for death or violence.

I wish these people well and defend their right to call for deaths like this.




using this video as the source of the statement in this thread:
i think a more correct way of making your statement,

It is now defensible to call for the genocide of the white race, and suggesting that it is wrong is just whining.




top topics



 
33
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join