It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: wmd_2008
www.theglobeandmail.com...
The starving polar bear raises a question: Is fake news okay for a good cause?
The plague of polar bears, he explained might also mean the bears' food supply is shrinking, so they're checking out the local garbage dumps.
They will have a longer season for motorbiking, why aren't they happy?
It's also noted you ignored the comments posted re Inuit people living in the Arctic Circle.
Confirming Global Greening
originally posted by: alphabetaone
a reply to: EvidenceNibbler
Are you attempting to debunk climate shift? Or are you attempting to debunk anthropogenic climate shift?
originally posted by: FawnyKate
Oh look at those peaks and troughs!
looks just like a bunch of solar cycles to me! Oh wait!
If you read the news today, we're being told we are heading into a mini ice age.
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
How can you say it any better than that?
Muh Global Warming was nothing but a conspiracy to implement the largest transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich that this planet has ever seen. President Trump broke all the rules and pulled out of the useless Paris Agreement. MAGA
From the ICCP itself:
The climate system is a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.
www.ipcc.ch...
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
An appeal to emotion works well on you !
Muh Polar Bears, they gonna go extinct !
Think of all the happy seals ?
Maybe enough the Canadians can start clubbing them again ?
Silver lining in each cloud they say.
They will have a longer season for motorbiking, why aren't they happy?
It's also noted you ignored the comments posted re Inuit people living in the Arctic Circle.
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: wmd_2008
Sea level has been rising for 200 years, are you saying this is all caused by rising C02 levels?
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: EvidenceNibbler
a reply to: wmd_2008
Sea level has been rising for 200 years, are you saying this is all caused by rising C02 levels?
If you'd kindly post your peer-reviewed scientific evidence that clearly shows why it wouldn't be, it would be appreciated.
Abstract
Background
Long records of sea level show decadal and multi-decadal oscillations of synchronous and asynchronous phases, which cannot be detected in short-term records. Without incorporating these oscillations, it is impossible to make useful assessments of present global accelerations and reliable predictions of future changes of sea level. Furthermore, it is well known that local sea-level changes occur also because of local factors such as subsidence due to groundwater or oil extraction, or tectonic movements that may be either up or down.
Purpose
Limited data from limited areas of study are, therefore, unsuitable for making predictions about the whole world sea level. Yet, people continue to make such predictions, often on an alarming scale. Here, we use one example to illustrate the problems associated with trying to make sea-level predictions based on a short record (25 years) in a limited region.
Methods
Linear and parabolic fittings of monthly average mean sea levels (MSL) of global as well as different local (United States Atlantic Coast, United States Pacific Coast) data sets of long tide gauge records.
Results
It is clear from the analyses of the tide gauges of the “NOAA-120”, “US 39”, “PSMSL-162”, “Mitrovica-23”, “Holgate-9”, and “California-8” data sets and the United States Pacific and Atlantic coasts that the sea level has been oscillating about the same almost perfectly linear trend line all over the 20th century and the first 17 years of this century.
Conclusion
It is of paramount importance to discuss the proper way to assess the present acceleration of sea levels. This can not be done by focusing on the short-term upward oscillations in selected locations. The information from the tide gauges of the United States does not support any claim of rapidly changing ice mass in Greenland and Antarctica. The data only suggest the sea levels have been oscillating about the same trend line during the last century and this century..
C02 is a molecule, not an element.
Now I will posit on some CO2 theory, mostly relating to absorption rate....CO2 has a horrible absorption rate and in the realm of thermodynamics, it's a pretty key element.
originally posted by: 2FurryMidgets
Can somebody please provide some info that shows evidence proving climate change is fake?