It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
It appears that email is discussing a clarification of the phrase "Russian persons". Which they should clarify, as it is too vague.
Really not much to see here. They used a vague term/phrase and worked to further clarify/define.
The email was sent to a person they wished to provide info of russian persons he had contact with.
Concerning the precise context to the email, TYT reports the following:
On July 27, 2017, Charles C. Johnson, a controversial right-wing media figure, received a letter from Sens. Burr and Warner requesting that he voluntarily provide materials in his possession that are “relevant” to the committee’s investigation. Relevant materials, the letter went on, would include any records of interactions Johnson had with “Russian persons” who were involved in some capacity in the 2016 U.S. elections.
The committee further requested materials related to “Russian persons” who were involved in some capacity in “activities that related in any way to the political election process in the U.S.” Materials may include “documents, emails, text messages, direct messages, calendar appointments, memoranda, [and] notes,” the letter outlined.
They then define russian persons as anyone of russian descent.
That is a horrible standard.
So anyone he had contact with that are merely a poll station worker, a journalsits, or any other such thing, and you happen to be of russian heritage, your name needs to be given to the senate committee.
People being supected based merely on their race? thats absurd.
I think it is quite obvious what she is saying.
She starts the very next sentence saying "With that clarification" will the players client now provide documents and interviews.
originally posted by: pompel9
originally posted by: Grambler
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
It appears that email is discussing a clarification of the phrase "Russian persons". Which they should clarify, as it is too vague.
Really not much to see here. They used a vague term/phrase and worked to further clarify/define.
The email was sent to a person they wished to provide info of russian persons he had contact with.
Concerning the precise context to the email, TYT reports the following:
On July 27, 2017, Charles C. Johnson, a controversial right-wing media figure, received a letter from Sens. Burr and Warner requesting that he voluntarily provide materials in his possession that are “relevant” to the committee’s investigation. Relevant materials, the letter went on, would include any records of interactions Johnson had with “Russian persons” who were involved in some capacity in the 2016 U.S. elections.
The committee further requested materials related to “Russian persons” who were involved in some capacity in “activities that related in any way to the political election process in the U.S.” Materials may include “documents, emails, text messages, direct messages, calendar appointments, memoranda, [and] notes,” the letter outlined.
They then define russian persons as anyone of russian descent.
That is a horrible standard.
So anyone he had contact with that are merely a poll station worker, a journalsits, or any other such thing, and you happen to be of russian heritage, your name needs to be given to the senate committee.
People being supected based merely on their race? thats absurd.
Russian is not a race, other than that I completely agree with you.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: afatos
I thought many Russians are slavic, no?
originally posted by: Grambler
I assume you would be more than happy to see anyone of russian descent rounded up and detained, because you KNOW that trump stole the election with Russia and likes hookers pee.
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: afatos
Ok, this could get complicated. I am going with, Russians are mostly East Slavic, and that is the primary consensus. Whatever regard that has to Race, thats up for whatever discussion anybody wants it to be.
I will limit my discussion to simply leaving the publicly documented resources and allow anyone interested to their own conclusions.
Regardless, it should be looked at as #ed up to target a group of people for suspicion based on their ancestry alone.